Andrei POPESCU writes:
> Here's the snippet I use:
>
>
> # Use everything that looks like a mailbox in ~/Maildir/
> # except the ones explicitely excluded
> mailboxes ! + `\
> for file in ~/Maildir/.*; do \
> box=$(basename "$file"); \
> if [ ! "$box" = '.' -a ! "$box" = '..' \
>
On Lu, 22 oct 12, 15:41:48, lee wrote:
>
> Have you looked at the documentation of mutt? It talks about mail
> folders. It also talks about directories. It cannot rename folders or
> directories and it cannot (re-)move them (the argument is that mutt
> isn't a file manager), and it doesn't real
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:10:09AM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> On 21/10/12 10:51, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > Could you please elaborate on that? As far as I can tell it's just a
> > matter of configuring mutt correctly (the defaults are not really
> > optimal). Mutt + Gmail, now that is a cha
Chris Bannister writes:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 05:58:59PM +0200, lee wrote:
>> Mutt isn't designed with the concept of folders in mind. It merely
>> acknowledges the concept because the mails need to be stored
>> /somewhere/.
>
> You mean it doesn't work out of the box and requires some confi
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 05:58:59PM +0200, lee wrote:
> Mutt isn't designed with the concept of folders in mind. It merely
> acknowledges the concept because the mails need to be stored
> /somewhere/.
You mean it doesn't work out of the box and requires some configuration?
Hey, JFYI most good soft
Andrei POPESCU writes:
> On Sb, 20 oct 12, 06:54:21, lee wrote:
>>
>> Wally wants to learn some C programming, thus I suggested he learn emacs
>> and might use gnus and try out vim and/or joe, whatever he likes best.
>> Perhaps I should have mentioned mutt as well, but mutt with imap can be
>> r
On Du, 21 oct 12, 11:10:09, Erwan David wrote:
> On 21/10/12 10:51, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > Mutt + Gmail, now that is a challenge!
> >
> Not really, the challenge is mutt + heavy html emails...
> GMail is easy once you activate imap and use mutt as an imap reader (in
> that case it's better to u
On 21/10/12 10:51, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Sb, 20 oct 12, 06:54:21, lee wrote:
>>
>> Wally wants to learn some C programming, thus I suggested he learn emacs
>> and might use gnus and try out vim and/or joe, whatever he likes best.
>> Perhaps I should have mentioned mutt as well, but mutt with i
On Tuesday 23 March 2010 03:29:05 Ron Johnson wrote:
> Next time you attach such a file, I suggest that you add a ".txt" so
> that your email/webmail app knows that it is a text file, instead of
> base64 encoded application/octet-stream.
>
> (Iceweasel/Thunderbird seems to "peek" into it, probably
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:29:05PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2010-03-22 21:56, Mike Viau wrote:
>> Attached for you convenience!
>> sourced from: Debian Lenny
>
> Next time you attach such a file, I suggest that you add a ".txt" so
> that your email/webmail app knows that it is a text file,
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:29:05 -0500 wrote:
>
> On 2010-03-22 21:56, Mike Viau wrote:
> > Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:29:01 -0400 wrote:
> > >
> > > On 23:37 Fri 19 Mar , Mike Viau wrote:
> > > > > > My output with the suggestion above.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > debian:~# dpkg --dry-run --pu
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 08:37:06PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
> begin Alan James quotation:
>
> > I'd like to give maildir a go, so how do I convert MH to MailDir ?
>
> If you use procmail, just set up new empty maildir folders corresponding
> to each of your old MH folders, edit .procmailrc t
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 12:25:31AM -0500, Chris Hilts wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 08:37:06PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
> > (and to know that they're in maildir format), then run all your old
> > messages back through procmail again.
>
> I believe procmail comes with a utility called 'formai
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 08:37:06PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
> (and to know that they're in maildir format), then run all your old
> messages back through procmail again.
I believe procmail comes with a utility called 'formail' which you might
find useful for this.
Chris Hilts
[EMAIL PROTECTED
begin Alan James quotation:
> I'd like to give maildir a go, so how do I convert MH to MailDir ?
If you use procmail, just set up new empty maildir folders corresponding
to each of your old MH folders, edit .procmailrc to use the new folders
(and to know that they're in maildir format), then ru
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 12:59:15PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
> begin Alan James quotation:
>
> > Are you still using MH folders ? How'd you get mutt to show a list of MH
> > folders with the new message count for each ?
>
> I converted my MH folders to maildir and now I use that. Mutt seems
begin Alan James quotation:
> Are you still using MH folders ? How'd you get mutt to show a list of MH
> folders with the new message count for each ?
I converted my MH folders to maildir and now I use that. Mutt seems to
handle maildir better, and it's a better format in general (you don't
h
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 10:44:30 -0800
Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I found it a major annoyance, but maybe I just receive a lot more mail
> than you do.
Probably, ive just joined this list, and I've more than doubled my daily mail.
> To me, also, there was the basic question, why do I
begin Alan James quotation:
> Bob Thibodeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I thought I'd try Sylpheed after seing mention of it on this
> > list, but never felt like configuring another client. Now that
> > I've read it doesn't play nice with mutt, I'll just remove it.
>
> I've got it working
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 21:36:18 -0500
Bob Thibodeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought I'd try Sylpheed after seing mention of it on this
> list, but never felt like configuring another client. Now that
> I've read it doesn't play nice with mutt, I'll just remove it.
I've got it working reasonab
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 02:00:03 -0600
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I dunno. Don't have it installed anymore. Pretty recent version
> > > of the non-claws version (last month or so). The memory leak was
> > > a slow but substantial one. I was often leaving Sylpheed running
> > > for
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 04:53:02 -0300 Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 14:06:10 -0800
> "Eric G. Miller" wrote:
>
> > I dunno. Don't have it installed anymore. Pretty recent version
> > of the non-claws version (last month or so). The memory leak was
> > a s
On 24 Feb 2002 20:28:56 +
Patrick Kirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-02-24 at 19:55, Bill Moseley wrote:
> > At 11:25 AM 02/24/02 -0800, Eric G. Miller wrote:
>
> >
> > Although I read that IMAP can be slow if you have many mailboxes (I have
> > almost 100), and hundreds of messa
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 14:06:10 -0800
"Eric G. Miller" wrote:
> I dunno. Don't have it installed anymore. Pretty recent version
> of the non-claws version (last month or so). The memory leak was
> a slow but substantial one. I was often leaving Sylpheed running
> for days, but after a couple it w
I switched from Eudora and Pegasus in Windows to
Elm and now mutt in Linux. I found the transition to be
painless, although I did miss the folder handling in the
early days. I did run Pegasus with WINE for a while, but
made the final switch because I wanted to get away from
the non-standard mailbox
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 06:30:17PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 21:56:23 -0800
> "Eric G. Miller" wrote:
>
> > Possibly dead?
> >
> > > Sylpheed: (which I just read about on this list).
> >
> > Works pretty well. Is fairly lightweight. I noticed it leaks a
> >
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 21:56:23 -0800
"Eric G. Miller" wrote:
> Possibly dead?
>
> > Sylpheed: (which I just read about on this list).
>
> Works pretty well. Is fairly lightweight. I noticed it leaks a
> significant amount of memory over time (days). No idea about
> IMAP support (think
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 09:41:54 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 09:33:55AM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
> >
> > Sylpheed is quite nice. I don't use it myself because I don't want to be
> > dependent on an X app to read my mail (I use mutt), but my wife switched
> > to Sylphee
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 09:22:22 -0800
Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> begin Michael P. Soulier quotation:
>
> > Sylpheed is excellent I'm told.
>
> Sylpheed is quite nice. I don't use it myself because I don't want to be
> dependent on an X app to read my mail (I use mutt), but my
On Sun, 2002-02-24 at 14:28, Patrick Kirk wrote:
> Evolution is a heavy application and has some quirks. but it is a very
> good IMAP client in that it allows shortcuts to your frequently used
> mailboxes and only asks you to select from mailboxes as opposed to all
> files.
I run an IMAP server
On Sun, 2002-02-24 at 19:55, Bill Moseley wrote:
> At 11:25 AM 02/24/02 -0800, Eric G. Miller wrote:
>
> Although I read that IMAP can be slow if you have many mailboxes (I have
> almost 100), and hundreds of messages a day.
>
>
I have the same problem. The truth is that most mail cleints that
At 11:25 AM 02/24/02 -0800, Eric G. Miller wrote:
>I believe nmh uses .mh_sequences or some such. So, that would probably
>be the "standard" way. Sylpheed uses it's own sequence file, so it
>won't even jibe with the mh way of managing mail. This is something
>the Sylpheed folks should fix. I tr
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 01:00:15PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 10:05:13 -0800 Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] quotation:
> >
> > > Is there a debian package for Sylpheed?
> >
> > Yes, in Woody and Sid.
> >
> > > BTW -- why would using
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 10:05:13 -0800 Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] quotation:
>
> > Is there a debian package for Sylpheed?
>
> Yes, in Woody and Sid.
>
> > BTW -- why would using an X mail application exclude you from also
> > running mutt?
>
> It's not so
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 09:41:54 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 09:33:55AM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
> >
> > Sylpheed is quite nice. I don't use it myself because I don't want to be
> > dependent on an X app to read my mail (I use mutt), but my wife switched
> > to Sylphee
begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] quotation:
> Is there a debian package for Sylpheed?
Yes, in Woody and Sid.
> BTW -- why would using an X mail application exclude you from also
> running mutt?
It's not so much "prevented" as "made sufficiently painful". I tried
using Sylpheed and mutt together severa
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 09:33:55AM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
>
> Sylpheed is quite nice. I don't use it myself because I don't want to be
> dependent on an X app to read my mail (I use mutt), but my wife switched
> to Sylpheed after we decided that Outlook Express was too dangerous, and
> she's
At 08:46 AM 02/24/02 -0800, Wendell Cochran wrote:
>> So, to start off with, I'm looking to make the transition to full-time
>Linux easy by finding similar tools to I'm used to using.
>[snip]
>
>Similarities can be confusing. Maybe -- maybe -- you'd do better
>to accept differences, even seek them
begin Michael P. Soulier quotation:
> Sylpheed is excellent I'm told.
Sylpheed is quite nice. I don't use it myself because I don't want to be
dependent on an X app to read my mail (I use mutt), but my wife switched
to Sylpheed after we decided that Outlook Express was too dangerous, and
s
> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 21:38:37 -0800
> From: Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[snip]
> . . . Like many, I'm coming from a Windows environment. I've got
> three linux machines under my desk and for a year now I've booted Win98
> used basically only browsers and Eudora (3.0) on my Win9
On 23/02/02 Bill Moseley did speaketh:
> My head is swimming a bit trying to limit my choices of mail clients to test.
My personal preference is Mutt, but coming from browsers and Eudora, you
might want to try something simpler to begin with.
Evolution is not ready, IMHO. Even at 1.0 su
On Sun, 2002-02-24 at 05:55, Timothy R. Butler wrote:
>
> > I was using RedHat 7.2 for a while and I actually liked the KDE setup,
> > although a bit heavy weight. But I also like how light-weight of a setup I
> > now have with Debian. (I suppose I'll need a desktop environment at some
> > point
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 09:38:37PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> And not related to email, anyone have a replacement suggestion (other than
> Emacs ;) for my old basic friend on the windows side of Program File Editor
> (pfe)?
Don't waste time with emacs and vi. Try jed. It's the best console
editor
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 09:38:37PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> I was using RedHat 7.2 for a while and I actually liked the KDE setup,
> although a bit heavy weight. But I also like how light-weight of a setup I
> now have with Debian. (I suppose I'll need a desktop environment at some
> point.)
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 09:38:37PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> Evolution:
No comment other than lots of eye candy and resource demands.
Several like it. It and its brethren nautilus are just to
resource intensive for my old hardware.
> Mahogany:
No idea.
> Aethera:
No idea.
> I was using RedHat 7.2 for a while and I actually liked the KDE setup,
> although a bit heavy weight. But I also like how light-weight of a setup I
> now have with Debian. (I suppose I'll need a desktop environment at some
> point.)
You might give KDE 2.2.2 (from unstable) a try. It feels m
Well,
there is one email client that will do most of what Outlook Express does.
XFmail. Not used alone though, but together with exim and fetchmail it works
great for me. I have two accounts dealt with fine using XFmail. Using filters,
and the option to set a custom "From" for every folder it is v
Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:
Jorge Araya (Mailbox or Conference is full.)
Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:
Jorge Araya (Mailbox or Conference is full.)
Stephen Pitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> See /usr/doc/exim/filter.txt.gz
> It answered all of my questions.
See also "info exim-filter".
--
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
>> "SP" == Stephen Pitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SP> Windows is designed for the causal user. That's great,
SP> initially. There is no learning curve,
Hahahahahahah.
Sorry. I work parttime on phone support to pay for my studies. I can
assure you, that a current Linux is no more complicated
>> "JB" == Jim B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dispite some vocal mails from other users, I have a simple solution
for you.
JB> Someone sends to joe and the mail is filtered into his
JB> mailbox... meanwhile, tom's mail is filtered into his mailbox.
No problem. postilion does this without any pro
On Sun, May 23, 1999 at 02:25:47AM -0400, Sean wrote:
> I've been wanting to set up fetchmail/exim/mutt but I've been having a
> hell of a time figuring out the syntax for the .forward file. The docs
> talk about using the .forward file, but nowhere is there an example of
> what one should look li
On Sat, May 22, 1999 at 10:01:10PM -0700, George Bonser wrote:
> On Sat, 22 May 1999, Stephen Pitts wrote:
>
> > Why not just have multiple instances of Communicator? It sounds to me
> > like you've become so attached to this particular piece of software
> > that you believe that you can't work an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 23 May 1999 05:06:47 -0400, Jan Muszynski wrote:
>Have you tried running this under Wine?
Yes, doesn't install, doesn't run.
- --
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343
On 22 May 99, at 19:03, Steve Lamb
wrote about Re: mail clients:
[snipped to conserve bandwidth]
>
> A perfect example of this is PMMail98 on OS/2 & Windows. Yeah, I know,
> Windows, GUI, ick. But my point is not the GUI, not the mouse, not the
> keyboard, not
I don't want to break up this lively discourse but has anyone here tried
the IshMail Mail client? I am about to try it but want to know if there
are homemade .debs around or if I will have to make them myself.
--
John Foster
AdVance-Computing Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 23 May 1999 02:06:13 -0400, Allan M. Wind wrote:
>2 is the better option, it doesn't look like mutt likes remote smtp
>servers but I could be wrong (just skimmed the docs). There are other
>MUA that does (communicator for instance).
Now
On 1999-05-22 23:45, Stephen Pitts wrote:
> Why not just have multiple instances of Communicator?
That's trouble. To my understanding there is only one lock file for
the .netscape directory which would render concurrent access either
inoperable or a disaster.
> Linux users faced with a problem
On 23-May-99 George Bonser wrote:
>
> xfmail handles multiple pop3 accounts at the same time. I just tried that
> mahogany program ... caused me to loose about 2000 old messages ... gone,
> evaporated, dead.
>
> It does not work well with any large mailboxes.
I am using xfmail too. I tried Mah
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 23 May 1999 00:09:23 -0400, Jim B wrote:
>This is not about "what OS is for whom," "who is what kind of user," or
>anything like that. The question is: "Does a client with these features
>exist for the Linux platform?"
No.
>If one does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 22 May 1999 22:01:10 -0700 (PDT), George Bonser wrote:
>xfmail handles multiple pop3 accounts at the same time. I just tried that
>mahogany program ... caused me to loose about 2000 old messages ... gone,
>evaporated, dead.
But not multip
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 22 May 1999 23:45:39 -0500, Stephen Pitts wrote:
>Why not just have multiple instances of Communicator?
Then that wouldn't be a single application, would it?
>It sounds to me like you've become so attached to this particular piece of
>so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 22 May 1999 23:42:05 -0500, Stephen Pitts wrote:
>Define casual user. People who spend 4+ hours/day on the computer, whether it
>be for business, or for school, or just for fun, are not casual users. I
>think that a whole lot more of the marke
On Sat, May 22, 1999 at 06:45:27PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sat, 22 May 1999 21:08:26 -0500, Stephen Pitts wrote:
>
> >Wrong. If you use the multiple accounts support built into Communicator,
> >you have seperate preferences, bookmarks, mai
inal Message -
From: Stephen Pitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Stephen Pitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Steve Lamb
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Sunday, May 23, 1999 12:42 AM
Subject: Re: mail clients
> Define casual user. People who spend 4+ hours/day on t
Define casual user. People who spend 4+ hours/day on the computer, whether it be
for business, or for school, or just for fun, are not casual users. I think
that a
whole lot more of the market fits that criteria than most people realize.
Windows is designed for the causal user. That's great, init
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 22 May 1999 18:20:27 -0700 (PDT), George Bonser wrote:
>On Sat, 22 May 1999, Stephen Pitts wrote:
>> Mutt/fetchmail/exim works fine for me, with 2 accounts. Contrary to popular
>Mutt is a non-option for most users who want the functionality
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 22 May 1999 16:48:47 -0500, Stephen Pitts wrote:
>Unix-esque operating systems are _not_ designed for casual use.
I understand that.
>The more you understand about the way computers work, the more efficently you
>will be able to do thing
On Fri, May 21, 1999 at 08:03:45PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, 21 May 1999 22:55:46 -0400, Allan M. Wind wrote:
>
> >So, if you have known about this "problem" for years, where is your
> >solution? Show me the code!
>
> This is the
On Fri, May 21, 1999 at 09:23:53PM -0400, Jim B wrote:
> Hi all. Is there a good POP3 and/or IMAP4 client (console or GUI, doesn't
> matter) that supports multiple accounts with easy switching between them...
> and that can filter based on the "account" concept rather than just on
> headers?
>
>
On 22-May-99 George Bonser wrote:
> On Sat, 22 May 1999, Pollywog wrote:
>
>> I have the deb package installed but I also don't believe it is under
>> active
>> development. I downloaded a new client "Mahogany Mail", which reminds me
>> of
>> Eudora.
>
> Where did you get it.
Linuxberg (TUCO
On 22-May-99 George Bonser wrote:
> On Sat, 22 May 1999, Russell Rademacher wrote:
>
>> Dunno if there is a deb package for it but you can complie it yourself
>> and install it. I have been using it for nearly a year and have no
>> complaint about it. Although.. it would be nice if they upd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Reply to Reply-to...
==BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE==
>From: "Steve Lamb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Debian Developers"
>Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 21:47:28 -0700
>Subject: Re: mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Reply-to... Reply-to...
==BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE==
>From: "Steve Lamb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Debian Developers"
>Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 21:46:01 -0700
>Subject: Re: mail
While people are complaining about this... they have overlooked one
email client that does that job as I have been using at work. It is called
XFMail. It is full featured email client written like 3 years back and it
got rules filtering system so you can set it any which way you want.
Du
On 1999-05-21 20:03, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Fri, 21 May 1999 22:55:46 -0400, Allan M. Wind wrote:
>
> >So, if you have known about this "problem" for years, where is your
> >solution? Show me the code!
>
> This is the other bone I have to pick.
>
> NOT EVERYONE IS A PROGRAMMER AND CAN
On Fri, 21 May 1999, Steve Lamb wrote:
> I get tired of people asking me for the code. Pretentious, rude,
> arrogant and utterly annoying. If I could code worth a damn, do you think
> I'd be on the Software Bazaar offering $35 for the first person to put
> *color* into joe? :P
Pretentious,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 21 May 1999 22:55:46 -0400, Allan M. Wind wrote:
>So, if you have known about this "problem" for years, where is your
>solution? Show me the code!
This is the other bone I have to pick.
NOT EVERYONE IS A PROGRAMMER AND CAN CODE. IT
On 1999-05-21 19:42, Steve Lamb wrote:
> No. There is not. Many people will point you to Netscape, mutt,
> procmail, fetchmail, blah-forking-blah. Do *NOT* believe them. Sure, it
> works, after you hack it all together and switch your thinking a total 180
> degrees to something archaic and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 21 May 1999 21:23:53 -0400, Jim B wrote:
>Hi all. Is there a good POP3 and/or IMAP4 client (console or GUI, doesn't
>matter) that supports multiple accounts with easy switching between them...
>and that can filter based on the "account" conce
81 matches
Mail list logo
