On Friday, January 31, 2003 11:15, Michael Wardle wrote:
> I've only recently subscribed to debian-user, and I notice that I
> receive messages sent to the list 4 or 5 hours after they have been
> sent.
As Nathan and others pointed out, there was an unusually high amount of
Internet traffic aroun
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 07:36:00PM -0500, Mike Dresser wrote:
> | On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> |
> | "At present, SPI cannot accept donations in Canadian currency due to the
> | reluctance of U.S. banks to deal with Canadian
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 01:18:30AM -0500, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
> Which is why many Canadian stores dealing with American currency advise
> customers that they would be usually further ahead to use debit or
> credit cards and hopefully take advantage of the card issuer's bulk
> currency exchange rat
On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 01:00, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 10:57:09PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> > That's almost funny. Around here, Canadian coins (quaters, dimes,
> > nickels, pennies) are treated as equal to US coins by people and
> > cashiers. (vending machines won'
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 10:57:09PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> That's almost funny. Around here, Canadian coins (quaters, dimes,
> nickels, pennies) are treated as equal to US coins by people and
> cashiers. (vending machines won't take Canadian, though) I can't
> speak for the local b
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 07:36:00PM -0500, Mike Dresser wrote:
| On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
|
| "At present, SPI cannot accept donations in Canadian currency due to the
| reluctance of U.S. banks to deal with Canadian funds. SPI is currently
| evaluating the possibility of ope
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 14:59:59 +1100
bob parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This may be due to circumstances at the time. I've been subscribed for a few
> months now and I find that my messages are returned at any time between a
> minute and a couple of hours maximum.
Possible postfix problem
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
"At present, SPI cannot accept donations in Canadian currency due to the
reluctance of U.S. banks to deal with Canadian funds. SPI is currently
evaluating the possibility of opening an account in a Canadian bank. "
:/
Then again, i've always been
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 09:20:46PM -0900, Andy wrote:
> > OTOH there's no argument that the debian list server is probably in
> > need of an upgrade. I've no idea what they've got right now, but I'm
> > sure donations will be accepted :-)
>
> WellI will be the first to step up to the plate!
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 01:29:56PM -0800, nate wrote:
> some additional data. redhat's user list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has
> been pretty responsive recently, but today it seems to have stalled,
Really? I've always gotten better responses out of debian-user. *duck*
--
.''`. Baloo <[EMAIL PRO
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 09:20:46PM -0900, Andy wrote:
| > OTOH there's no argument that the debian list server is probably in
| > need of an upgrade. I've no idea what they've got right now, but I'm
| > sure donations will be accepted :-)
|
| WellI will be the first to step up to the plate!
> OTOH there's no argument that the debian list server is probably in
> need of an upgrade. I've no idea what they've got right now, but I'm
> sure donations will be accepted :-)
WellI will be the first to step up to the plate!
I will donate $100 (US) right NOW!
It is the least I can do c
Narins, Josh wrote:
>DEAR DEBIAN USER, this is joke e-mail. I think.
>
>We are manipulating the time in the headers
>in order to cover the tracks from our efforts
>to monitor the e-amail from sketchy users
>such as yourself
>to prevent them from posting rude or obnoxious e-mails
>
>We've noted you
DEAR DEBIAN USER, this is joke e-mail. I think.
We are manipulating the time in the headers
in order to cover the tracks from our efforts
to monitor the e-amail from sketchy users
such as yourself
to prevent them from posting rude or obnoxious e-mails
We've noted your peculair penchant for postin
Sean Burlington said:
>> No offense, but I seriously doubt that last Friday and Saturday you were
>> getting replies in under a minute from any mailing list.
>>
>
> no but I have since monday
some additional data. redhat's user list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has
been pretty responsive recently, but tod
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 08:51:28PM +, Sean Burlington wrote:
> Nathan E Norman wrote:
>
> >Say, do those other mailing lists (why would you need other lists??
> >:-) apply spamfilter to every message?
>
> some do some don't - but this is by far the slowest list I can
> remember subscribing to
Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 05:37:09PM +, Sean Burlington wrote:
mail does seem to get stuck on the mailserver at debian for a couple of
hours
Sometimes, but not all the time. Thus, we can conclude that this is
not a constant problem.
so it's probably not down to t
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 05:37:09PM +, Sean Burlington wrote:
> Nathan E Norman wrote:
[ snip ]
> >I'm sure if someone donated a more powerful machine and more
> >bandwidth, it would help.
> >
> >I've some opinions for slowness:
> >
> >1) Overall crappiness of the Internet due to the exploit du
Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 08:36:01PM -0600, Jason Pepas wrote:
On Thursday 30 January 2003 06:15 pm, Michael Wardle wrote:
Hi
I've only recently subscribed to debian-user, and I notice that I
receive messages sent to the list 4 or 5 hours after they have been
sent. Among
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 11:15:29AM +1100, Michael Wardle wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've only recently subscribed to debian-user, and I notice that I
> receive messages sent to the list 4 or 5 hours after they have been
> sent. Among other things, this typically results in several identical
> responses to a
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 08:36:01PM -0600, Jason Pepas wrote:
> On Thursday 30 January 2003 06:15 pm, Michael Wardle wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I've only recently subscribed to debian-user, and I notice that I
> > receive messages sent to the list 4 or 5 hours after they have been
> > sent. Among other
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 11:15, Michael Wardle wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've only recently subscribed to debian-user, and I notice that I
> receive messages sent to the list 4 or 5 hours after they have been
> sent. Among other things, this typically results in several identical
> responses to a question, as su
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 11:15:29AM +1100, Michael Wardle wrote:
> I've only recently subscribed to debian-user, and I notice that I
> receive messages sent to the list 4 or 5 hours after they have been
> sent.
You must be new to the Internet. Email and news have no gauranteed
delivery time. Be
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 11:15:29AM +1100, Michael Wardle wrote:
| I've only recently subscribed to debian-user, and I notice that I
| receive messages sent to the list 4 or 5 hours after they have been
| sent.
It varies over time. Sometimes the list is processed very rapidly,
and sometimes there
On Thursday 30 January 2003 06:15 pm, Michael Wardle wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've only recently subscribed to debian-user, and I notice that I
> receive messages sent to the list 4 or 5 hours after they have been
> sent. Among other things, this typically results in several identical
> responses to a ques
25 matches
Mail list logo
