Re: libdb.so.3 missing

2000-10-04 Thread Kevin Krafthefer
Oops, Sorry, I meant: http://lists.debian.org/debian-user-0009/msg04260.html Krafty Michael Smith wrote: > I ftp'ed libdb.so.3 from a working box, stuck it in the right place on the > machine, and > then did an upgrade. It's ugly, but effective, since there's an upgrade that > overwrites the

Re: libdb.so.3 missing

2000-10-04 Thread Kevin Krafthefer
This seems to be happening to a lot of people; play with woody for a while and lose your shared object libraries. But hey, that's the fun with the development version. This gets posted every third day on this list. Anyway, this is the pill that will save you (it worked for me and some "Pascal H

Re: libdb.so.3 missing

2000-10-04 Thread Michael Smith
I ftp'ed libdb.so.3 from a working box, stuck it in the right place on the machine, and then did an upgrade. It's ugly, but effective, since there's an upgrade that overwrites the "borrowed" version completely. Thomas Halahan wrote: > Andrew, > > I have had very similar problems. I upgraded to

Re: libdb.so.3 missing

2000-10-04 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 09:31:56AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 02:18:17PM +, Thomas Halahan wrote: > > Andrew, > > > > I have had very similar problems. I upgraded to libc6 > > libc6_2.1.94-1, which caused certain programs (apache, gnome-apt) to > > not locale libdb.so

Re: libdb.so.3 missing

2000-10-04 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 02:18:17PM +, Thomas Halahan wrote: > Andrew, > > I have had very similar problems. I upgraded to libc6 > libc6_2.1.94-1, which caused certain programs (apache, gnome-apt) to > not locale libdb.so.3. So I upgraded my libdb2 and this didn't help. > As encouraged I upg

RE: libdb.so.3 missing

2000-10-04 Thread Thomas Halahan
Andrew, I have had very similar problems. I upgraded to libc6 libc6_2.1.94-1, which caused certain programs (apache, gnome-apt) to not locale libdb.so.3. So I upgraded my libdb2 and this didn't help. As encouraged I upgraded to libc6_2.1.94-3 but I could not becuase it required libdb.so.3 which

Re: libdb.so.3 missing

2000-09-30 Thread Pollywog
On Sat, 30 Sep 2000 19:23:36 -0700 Michael Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ihad the same problem a couple of days ago--the hard party was that the > library was > missing, so I couldn't upgrade to a working version. It tried to > preconfigure, and > then perl tanked with the same error messa

Re: libdb.so.3 missing

2000-09-30 Thread Michael Smith
Ihad the same problem a couple of days ago--the hard party was that the library was missing, so I couldn't upgrade to a working version. It tried to preconfigure, and then perl tanked with the same error message that you got. What I did was ftp to another machine, grab /usr/lib/libdb.so.3, and

Re: libdb.so.3 missing

2000-09-30 Thread Jesse Goerz
On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, P.J.Walsh wrote: > dpkg is choking on some upgrades, showing libdb.so.3 missing... dpkg > -S doesn't help. To what does it belong? To find out which package it belongs to go to www.debian.org and go to the packages page. You can look up which package it belongs to.

Re: libdb.so.3 missing

2000-09-30 Thread Pollywog
On 30-Sep-2000 Ben Collins wrote: > > This is no longer true. Follow the threads. libc6 2.1.94-3 has zero > issues. Thanks, I will upgrade now. -- Andrew

Re: libdb.so.3 missing

2000-09-30 Thread Ben Collins
On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 09:54:56PM +, Pollywog wrote: > > On 30-Sep-2000 P.J.Walsh wrote: > > dpkg is choking on some upgrades, showing libdb.so.3 missing... dpkg > > -S doesn't help. To what does it belong? > > It belongs to the libdb package but the problem is with libc6. > I had to revert

RE: libdb.so.3 missing

2000-09-30 Thread Pollywog
On 30-Sep-2000 P.J.Walsh wrote: > dpkg is choking on some upgrades, showing libdb.so.3 missing... dpkg > -S doesn't help. To what does it belong? It belongs to the libdb package but the problem is with libc6. I had to revert to the previous versions of libc6, libc6-dev, and locales. The new lib