RE: kill, kill, kill...

2002-04-15 Thread Brooks R. Robinson
| Remember that's what's supposed to be occurring during | postremoval. If the | postremoval fails, how do you expect to get rid of files that might have | been created during preinst/postinst? cruft Brooks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub

Re: kill, kill, kill...

2002-04-14 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin hanasaki quotation: > Could someone define what a "release" constitutes? What is it about > "Potato" that makes it "old" - other than the kernel. Massive dependency changes. Such as a major system library, which would require replacing many or most packages on a system in order to upgrad

Re: kill, kill, kill...

2002-04-14 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin David Wright quotation: > > I am certainly not an advanced Debian package manager, but I am an > incredibly advanced Unix user by any measure. I think it's a little > disingenuous to claim that people like me shouldn't be using unstable. I can't speak for anybody else, but every time I'v

Re: kill, kill, kill...

2002-04-14 Thread Carlos Sousa
On Sun, 14 Apr 2002 08:46:29 -0500 dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... > Yeah, that's the quandry. The solution, IMO, is to kick out a stable > release at least once a year. That way stable is never more than a > year old, and then its age isn't an issue. potato was ancient more I'm a relati

Re: kill, kill, kill...

2002-04-14 Thread John Hasler
hanasaki writes: > Could someone define what a "release" constitutes? What is it about > "Potato" that makes it "old" - other than the kernel. The kernel is easy to upgrade, and most people have no need for a newer one anyway. It's everything else, especially libc6. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: kill, kill, kill...

2002-04-14 Thread hanasaki
Could someone define what a "release" constitutes? What is it about "Potato" that makes it "old" - other than the kernel. dman wrote: On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 10:33:50PM -0700, David Wright wrote: | | >I think problem is Debian "testing" is not released but too stable. So | >people tends to

Re: kill, kill, kill...

2002-04-14 Thread dman
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 10:33:50PM -0700, David Wright wrote: | | >I think problem is Debian "testing" is not released but too stable. So | >people tends to dive in without knowing how to deal with broken | >packages. After all it is testing, we need to know how to handle broken | >package :) |

Re: kill, kill, kill...

2002-04-14 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 10:33:50PM -0700, David Wright wrote: > > >I think problem is Debian "testing" is not released but too stable. So > >people tends to dive in without knowing how to deal with broken > >packages. After all it is testing, we need to know how to handle broken > >package

Re: kill, kill, kill...

2002-04-14 Thread David Wright
I think problem is Debian "testing" is not released but too stable. So people tends to dive in without knowing how to deal with broken packages. After all it is testing, we need to know how to handle broken package :) This brings out a bit of hypocracy in the typical Debian advocacy argumen

Re: kill, kill, kill...

2002-04-13 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 07:19:19AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > On 13-Apr-2002 David Wright wrote: > > > > How do I tell &*$#*@&% dpkg: "I dont' care that your f**king postremoval > > script returned errors, just get absolutely everything that had to do > > with this package off my sys

Re: kill, kill, kill...

2002-04-13 Thread Marc Wilson
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 02:53:06AM -0700, David Wright wrote: > How do I tell &*$#*@&% dpkg: "I dont' care that your f**king postremoval > script returned errors, just get absolutely everything that had to do > with this package off my system and forget it ever existed" ??? Remember that's what'

Re: kill, kill, kill...

2002-04-13 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Sat, Apr 13, 2002, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On 13-Apr-2002 David Wright wrote: > > > > How do I tell &*$#*@&% dpkg: "I dont' care that your f**king postremoval > > script returned errors, just get absolutely everything that had to do > > with this package off my sys

Re: kill, kill, kill...

2002-04-13 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 13-Apr-2002 David Wright wrote: > > How do I tell &*$#*@&% dpkg: "I dont' care that your f**king postremoval > script returned errors, just get absolutely everything that had to do > with this package off my system and forget it ever existed" ??? > > dpkg --force-all --purge XXX doesn't do

Re: kill, kill, kill...

2002-04-13 Thread Mark Zimmerman
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 02:53:06AM -0700, David Wright wrote: > > How do I tell &*$#*@&% dpkg: "I dont' care that your f**king postremoval > script returned errors, just get absolutely everything that had to do > with this package off my system and forget it ever existed" ??? > > dpkg --force-a