On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 19:26:56 +1200
Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 10:22:09AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > There have been numerous well-publicized breaches at banks, major
> > retailers, etc. (and doubtless even more unpublicized ones). If / when
> > hackers get your credentials to
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 10:22:09AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> There have been numerous well-publicized breaches at banks, major
> retailers, etc. (and doubtless even more unpublicized ones). If / when
> hackers get your credentials to one institution, do you really want
> them to have the keys to all
On Ma, 31 iul 12, 17:57:38, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> The problem is how many of those can you keep straight in your head?
> How many web sites and systems all need one of those unique passwords?
> And you aren't reusing those passwords on multiple unrelated sites are
> you?
>
> As with all things xk
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:08:28 +
Bonno Bloksma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >> Gibberish implies one wouldn't be able to remember the
> >> password/phrase.
>
> > Which is why, as Bruce Schneir recommends, you _write it down_.
>
> Which is what I do. Whenever I need a new password I open my editor,
> cl
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 20:31:56 +1200
Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 06:15:26PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:54:14 -0500
> > John Hasler wrote:
> >
> > Hello John,
> >
> > >Brad Rogers writes:
> > >> Yeah, on a Post-It note. Stuck to the monitor.
> > >
On Jul 31, 2012, at 9:00 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Fortunately for most of us there is the support group of family.They
> know these things and would help me with them.
I was 67 years old when it happened, and the family I have left
is 1000 miles away. Fortunately, my sister flew here to take
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Glenn English wrote:
> > Dud'n work, guys. I fell off my bike a couple years ago and completely
> > lost all my passwords. Rebuilding my servers (and laptops and iPads) was
> > no fun at all. Write 'em down and put the paper in a safe-deposit box.
>
> If you can't remember
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Glenn English wrote:
>
> On Jul 31, 2012, at 4:57 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>> On 7/31/2012 10:51 AM, Mike McClain wrote:
>>
>>>If a password is any place but in your head I question its
>>> security
>>
>> Agreed.
>
> Dud'n work, guys. I fell off my bike a coup
On 7/31/2012 7:03 PM, Glenn English wrote:
> Dud'n work, guys. I fell off my bike a couple years ago and completely
> lost all my passwords. Rebuilding my servers (and laptops and iPads) was
> no fun at all. Write 'em down and put the paper in a safe-deposit box.
If you can't remember the passw
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 7/31/2012 10:51 AM, Mike McClain wrote:
>
>> If a password is any place but in your head I question its
>> security
>
> Agreed.
>
>> Take a name and a number out of your childhood that you'll
>> remember forever like your first pet
On Jul 31, 2012, at 4:57 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 7/31/2012 10:51 AM, Mike McClain wrote:
>
>>If a password is any place but in your head I question its
>> security
>
> Agreed.
Dud'n work, guys. I fell off my bike a couple years ago and completely
lost all my passwords. Rebuilding m
Mike McClain wrote:
> If a password is any place but in your head I question its
> security but here's a scheme for secure passwords that are not
> subject to dictionary lookups and are easy to remember.
>
> Take a name and a number out of your childhood that you'll
> remember forever lik
On 7/31/2012 10:51 AM, Mike McClain wrote:
> If a password is any place but in your head I question its
> security
Agreed.
> Take a name and a number out of your childhood that you'll
> remember forever like your first pet and the first phone number
> you memorized, scrambled together.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 08:31:56PM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 06:15:26PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:54:14 -0500
> > John Hasler wrote:
> >
> > Hello John,
> >
> > >Brad Rogers writes:
> > >> Yeah, on a Post-It note. Stuck to the monitor.
Hi,
>> Gibberish implies one wouldn't be able to remember the
>> password/phrase.
> Which is why, as Bruce Schneir recommends, you _write it down_.
Which is what I do. Whenever I need a new password I open my editor, close my
eyes, randomly hit several keys on my keyboard and Bingo new random
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 06:15:26PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:54:14 -0500
> John Hasler wrote:
>
> Hello John,
>
> >Brad Rogers writes:
> >> Yeah, on a Post-It note. Stuck to the monitor.
> >That's what people do when you tell them not to write it down. _Tell_
> >them
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 07:14:06AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2012, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > http://xkcd.com/936/
> >
> > (I wonder how much truth there is behind this comic...)
>
> Don't bother wondering. Read the paper.
>
> http://arstechnica.com/business
Brian wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > Brian wrote:
> > > used. But if it can be demonstrated that a twenty character password can
> > > be forced in a time-frame which makes sense I'll stop doing it and most
> >
> > That depends. Are you using any dictionary words or easy characte
On Sun 29 Jul 2012 at 22:27:08 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jul 2012, Brian wrote:
> > used. But if it can be demonstrated that a twenty character password can
> > be forced in a time-frame which makes sense I'll stop doing it and most
>
> That depends. Are you using an
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:54:14 -0500
John Hasler wrote:
Hello John,
>Brad Rogers writes:
>> Yeah, on a Post-It note. Stuck to the monitor.
>That's what people do when you tell them not to write it down. _Tell_
>them to write it down and tell them _how_.
As it happens, I agree with you; write
I wrote:
> Which is why, as Bruce Schneir recommends, you _write it down_.
Brad Rogers writes:
> Yeah, on a Post-It note. Stuck to the monitor.
That's what people do when you tell them not to write it down. _Tell_
them to write it down and tell them _how_. They keep their credit cards
and cash
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:28:51 -0500
John Hasler wrote:
Hello John,
>Which is why, as Bruce Schneir recommends, you _write it down_.
Yeah, on a Post-It note. Stuck to the monitor. :-))
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediately a
Stan Hoeppner writes:
> Gibberish implies one wouldn't be able to remember the
> password/phrase.
Which is why, as Bruce Schneir recommends, you _write it down_.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l
On 7/30/2012 5:14 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> You need to have gibberish passphrases if you want it to be secure...
Gibberish implies one wouldn't be able to remember the password/phrase.
What you want is something recognizable to you but gibberish to all
others. I've been using su
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:14:06 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Hello Henrique,
>You need to have gibberish passphrases if you want it to be secure...
On one web site I use that requires a login, even pass phrases are
impossible to use as at least one character has to be 'punctuation' plu
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 29 iul 12, 22:27:08, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 Jul 2012, Brian wrote:
> > > used. But if it can be demonstrated that a twenty character password can
> > > be forced in a time-frame which makes sense I'll stop doing it and m
On Du, 29 iul 12, 22:27:08, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jul 2012, Brian wrote:
> > used. But if it can be demonstrated that a twenty character password can
> > be forced in a time-frame which makes sense I'll stop doing it and most
>
> That depends. Are you using any dictionar
On 7/29/2012 8:27 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012, Brian wrote:
used. But if it can be demonstrated that a twenty character password can
be forced in a time-frame which makes sense I'll stop doing it and most
On (exceedingly) rare occasions, it does happen that the t
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012, Brian wrote:
> used. But if it can be demonstrated that a twenty character password can
> be forced in a time-frame which makes sense I'll stop doing it and most
That depends. Are you using any dictionary words or easy character
permutations thereof to make a pass-phrase? If
On Sun 29 Jul 2012 at 15:00:04 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Well, it is the one account that will accept remote logins (in Debian) that
> exists everywhere.
True. But the security of an account doesn't depend on whether the
username is known or unknown. If it does, you have problem
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 29 Jul 2012 at 13:12:31 -0400, Tom H wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Brian wrote:
> > > No default configuration file will ever suit everyone or fit their
> > > needs, but the Debian sshd_config doesn't seem to me to be have any
> > > insecur
On Sun 29 Jul 2012 at 13:12:31 -0400, Tom H wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Brian wrote:
> >
> > No default configuration file will ever suit everyone or fit their
> > needs, but the Debian sshd_config doesn't seem to me to be have any
> > insecure aspects to it.
>
> Some might say th
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Brian wrote:
>
> No default configuration file will ever suit everyone or fit their
> needs, but the Debian sshd_config doesn't seem to me to be have any
> insecure aspects to it.
Some might say that "PermitRootLogin yes" default is insecure...
--
To UNSUBSCRI
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 3:25 AM, lina wrote:
>
> strangely my netstat showed my 139 and 445 ports are open.
>
> tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:445 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:139 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
>
> Do I need specify
>
> -A INPUT
On Lu, 23 iul 12, 12:00:37, Mark Allums wrote:
> >
> >True, but the downside is that you're going to experience random,
> >confusing absences of functionality in various applications, and it can
> >sometimes be difficult to figure out why ...
>
> It's dependency hell. Removing one highly useless
On 7/22/2012 11:19 PM, Celejar wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 18:58:36 +0200
Erwan David wrote:
However, I have noticed a tendency for things to be installed or
started that open new ports, and it's easy to overlook them. Aptitude
in particular will install extra packages that you don't need or
On Sunday 22 July 2012 11:44:04 lina wrote:
> > If you have a rainy afternoon to while away, install Wireshark and have
> > a play with it. Try various network connections while a capture is
> > running, and play with the filtering. One day you will need to use it
> > in anger.
>> Here "in anger",
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 08:24:45AM CEST, Andrei POPESCU
said:
> On Du, 22 iul 12, 20:51:04, Erwan David wrote:
> > >
> > bug 375500, but you do not have the whole discussion
> > Note that rephrasing it in 505662 leads to silence.
> >
> > SOme other but I cannot find them back, since they are old
On Lu, 23 iul 12, 04:14:10, lina wrote:
>
> Thanks for your suggestions. I didn't realize aptitude would install
> something else, and sometimes I treated the recommended as something
> complimentary. Many times I left the laptop to install and myself run
> outside to take a break.
I don't
On Du, 22 iul 12, 20:51:04, Erwan David wrote:
> >
> bug 375500, but you do not have the whole discussion
> Note that rephrasing it in 505662 leads to silence.
>
> SOme other but I cannot find them back, since they are old : I now
> prefer directly installing non packaged programs when I encounter
On 22/07/12 21:31, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
~$ netstat -ant|grep LISTEN
... or
~$ netstat -lnt
:-)
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/500cdfda.
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 18:58:36 +0200
Erwan David wrote:
>
> > However, I have noticed a tendency for things to be installed or
> > started that open new ports, and it's easy to overlook them. Aptitude
> > in particular will install extra packages that you don't need or want.
> For this, first thin
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 10:01:50PM +0800, lina wrote:
> Just today one website I cared about failed to open, certainly it's
> under attack.
And how does a firewall help in that case.
If you don't want your intranet web server being accessed
from outside, then that's what a firewall is for.
It
On 23 Jul, 2012, at 0:44, Mark Allums wrote:
> On 7/22/2012 11:09 AM, lina wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Brian wrote:
>>> On Sun 22 Jul 2012 at 22:01:50 +0800, lina wrote:
>>>
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Brian wrote:
> Heaven above knows why you need a firewall. The
On 22/07/12 20:29, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 22 iul 12, 20:15:33, Erwan David wrote:
>> On 22/07/12 20:07, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>>> Please do file bugs where appropriate.
>>>
>> In the past I was too often attacked or mocked, when doing such bug
>> reports that I stopped.
> Would you care to
On Du, 22 iul 12, 20:15:33, Erwan David wrote:
> On 22/07/12 20:07, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > Please do file bugs where appropriate.
> >
> In the past I was too often attacked or mocked, when doing such bug
> reports that I stopped.
Would you care to provide some examples?
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
On 22/07/12 20:07, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 22 iul 12, 19:51:33, Erwan David wrote:
>> Yes, indeed. But I've seen too many packages where recommends leeds to
>> installing full gnome where I do not want it, that I prefer having more
>> control (and thus more responsibility).
> Please do file
On Du, 22 iul 12, 19:51:33, Erwan David wrote:
> >
> Yes, indeed. But I've seen too many packages where recommends leeds to
> installing full gnome where I do not want it, that I prefer having more
> control (and thus more responsibility).
Please do file bugs where appropriate.
Kind regards,
Andr
On 22/07/12 19:29, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 22 iul 12, 18:58:36, Erwan David wrote:
>>> However, I have noticed a tendency for things to be installed or
>>> started that open new ports, and it's easy to overlook them. Aptitude
>>> in particular will install extra packages that you don't need
On Du, 22 iul 12, 22:33:49, lina wrote:
>
> Another thing I am a little concern,
>
> I can ssh from remote server back to laptop without password.
Passphraseless keys?
> but on the remote server, actually someone who has root privilege can
> easily su lina and ssh to my laptop (sorry to assume
On Du, 22 iul 12, 18:58:36, Erwan David wrote:
>
> > However, I have noticed a tendency for things to be installed or
> > started that open new ports, and it's easy to overlook them. Aptitude
> > in particular will install extra packages that you don't need or want.
> For this, first thing is to d
> However, I have noticed a tendency for things to be installed or
> started that open new ports, and it's easy to overlook them. Aptitude
> in particular will install extra packages that you don't need or want.
For this, first thing is to disable automatic installation of
recommended packages, it
On 7/22/2012 11:09 AM, lina wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Brian wrote:
On Sun 22 Jul 2012 at 22:01:50 +0800, lina wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Brian wrote:
Heaven above knows why you need a firewall. These services are quite
capable of getting on with life without ipta
Hi Lina,
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 03:25:03PM +0800, lina wrote:
>
> BTW, why need allow ping? from outside?
> 59 # Allow ping
> 60 -A INPUT -p icmp -m icmp --icmp-type 8 -j ACCEPT
>
> I know so little, thanks very much for your expilanation,
>
I've found www/grc.com/ and his 'ShieldsUp' sca
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 22 Jul 2012 at 22:01:50 +0800, lina wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Brian wrote:
>> >
>> > Heaven above knows why you need a firewall. These services are quite
>> > capable of getting on with life without iptables being involved
On Sun 22 Jul 2012 at 22:01:50 +0800, lina wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Brian wrote:
> >
> > Heaven above knows why you need a firewall. These services are quite
> > capable of getting on with life without iptables being involved. So are
> > you.
>
> Just today one website I cared ab
On Sun 22 Jul 2012 at 11:09:26 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jul 2012, Brian wrote:
> > The ssh and webserver daemons are available on the network. Presumably
> > this is what you want. Their security will depend on how you have
> > configured them. Debian sshd can be run
On 22/07/12 16:09, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jul 2012, Brian wrote:
>> The ssh and webserver daemons are available on the network. Presumably
>> this is what you want. Their security will depend on how you have
>> configured them. Debian sshd can be run safely with the default
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jul 2012, Brian wrote:
>> The ssh and webserver daemons are available on the network. Presumably
>> this is what you want. Their security will depend on how you have
>> configured them. Debian sshd can be run safely
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012, Brian wrote:
> The ssh and webserver daemons are available on the network. Presumably
> this is what you want. Their security will depend on how you have
> configured them. Debian sshd can be run safely with the default install.
Sort of. The recommended "almost worry-free" co
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 22 Jul 2012 at 18:08:25 +0800, lina wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Stan Hoeppner
>> wrote:
>> > On 7/22/2012 3:37 AM, lina wrote:
>> >
>> >> P.S I also found
>> >>
>> >> tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:631 0.0.0.0:*
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 15:25:03 +0800, lina wrote:
> strangely my netstat showed my 139 and 445 ports are open.
>
> tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:445 0.0.0.0:*LISTEN
> tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:139 0.0.0.0:*LISTEN
>
> Do I need specify
>
> -A INPUT
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 06:44:04PM +0800, lina wrote:
Thanks, packet looks for the IP address first or MAC address first?
(seems I read something before, it's a book/document written in 2001,
kinda of aged? still don't understand.)
IPv4 hasn’t change since then, and IPv6 is working quite simili
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012, lina wrote:
> strangely my netstat showed my 139 and 445 ports are open.
>
> tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:445 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:139 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
>
> Do I need specify
>
> -A INPUT -p tcp --dp
Claudius Hubig a écrit :
>
> While it is technically possible to block these requests for IPv4,
> you should never block ICMPv6, since it is necessary to do SLAAC.
Not only SLAAC (which is optional) but also neighbour discovery, which
is mandatory in most cases on a shared medium such as ethernet
On Sun 22 Jul 2012 at 18:08:25 +0800, lina wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > On 7/22/2012 3:37 AM, lina wrote:
> >
> >> P.S I also found
> >>
> >> tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:631 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> >> tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:25
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Joe wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 16:44:13 +0800
> lina wrote:
>
>>
>> Checked, now only 22 80 open with 443 closed.
>> another thing is that the nmap can scan my MAC address correctly.
>> is it bad? (I guess I will feel comfortable if the MAC address is
>> hidden)
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 11:32:58 +0200
Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Joe a écrit :
> >
> > All network communication is actually based on MAC addresses
>
> No. Communication over an ethernet network is, but not all network
> communication is.
>
>
I realise that, but there are only so many levels of c
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Hello,
>
> lina a écrit :
>> root@debian:/etc/iptables# dpkg --get-selections | grep gdomap
>>
>> no gdomap installed,
>> # dpkg -L gdomap
>> Package `gdomap' is not installed.
>> Use dpkg --info (= dpkg-deb --info) to examine archive files
On 07/22/2012 01:08 PM, lina wrote:
> Thanks, I only know 22, 25, 631 80 for ssh, email, cups and http,
> respectively,
>
> Best regards,
>
> P.S I will be glad to know more.
You can get the official list of what goes where from the file /etc/services
Regards
/Lars
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 7/22/2012 3:37 AM, lina wrote:
>
>> P.S I also found
>>
>> tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:631 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
>> tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:250.0.0.0:* LISTEN
>> tcp0 0 0.0.
Hello lina,
this is a rather strange name :)
lina wrote:
> BTW, why need allow ping? from outside?
> 59 # Allow ping
> 60 -A INPUT -p icmp -m icmp --icmp-type 8 -j ACCEPT
It doesn’t help to block ICMP echo requests:
- if you block them by dropping them, the other party knows that
you are (
Joe a écrit :
>
> All network communication is actually based on MAC addresses
No. Communication over an ethernet network is, but not all network
communication is.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lis
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 16:58:33 +0800
lina wrote:
> sorry, this one is easy to read
>
> # netstat -tupan | grep 538
> tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:538 0.0.0.0:*
> LISTEN 2366/gdomap
> udp0 0 0.0.0.0:538 0.0.0.0:*
> 2366/gdomap
>
>
>
gdomap appear
On 7/22/2012 3:37 AM, lina wrote:
> P.S I also found
>
> tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:631 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:250.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:538 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
Instead of
Hello,
lina a écrit :
> root@debian:/etc/iptables# dpkg --get-selections | grep gdomap
>
> no gdomap installed,
> # dpkg -L gdomap
> Package `gdomap' is not installed.
> Use dpkg --info (= dpkg-deb --info) to examine archive files,
> and dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list their conte
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 16:44:13 +0800
lina wrote:
>
> Checked, now only 22 80 open with 443 closed.
> another thing is that the nmap can scan my MAC address correctly.
> is it bad? (I guess I will feel comfortable if the MAC address is
> hidden)
>
All network communication is actually based on MA
sorry, this one is easy to read
# netstat -tupan | grep 538
tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:538 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN 2366/gdomap
udp0 0 0.0.0.0:538 0.0.0.0:*
2366/gdomap
Thanks,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Joe wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 16:37:16 +0800
> lina wrote:
>
>>
>> P.S I also found
>>
>> tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:631 0.0.0.0:*
>> LISTEN tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:25
>> 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp0 0
>> 0.0.0.0:538
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Joe wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 15:59:29 +0800
> lina wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Andrei POPESCU
>> wrote:
>> > On Du, 22 iul 12, 15:41:16, lina wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Thanks, I don't have some basic understanding about samba,
>> >> will read someth
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 16:37:16 +0800
lina wrote:
>
> P.S I also found
>
> tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:631 0.0.0.0:*
> LISTEN tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:25
> 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp0 0
> 0.0.0.0:538 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
>
>
> 631 is fo
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 7/22/2012 2:59 AM, lina wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Andrei POPESCU
>> wrote:
>>> On Du, 22 iul 12, 15:41:16, lina wrote:
Thanks, I don't have some basic understanding about samba,
will read something about it
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 15:59:29 +0800
lina wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Andrei POPESCU
> wrote:
> > On Du, 22 iul 12, 15:41:16, lina wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks, I don't have some basic understanding about samba,
> >> will read something about it.
> >> just a short quick question, is it ne
On 7/22/2012 2:59 AM, lina wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Andrei POPESCU
> wrote:
>> On Du, 22 iul 12, 15:41:16, lina wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks, I don't have some basic understanding about samba,
>>> will read something about it.
>>> just a short quick question, is it necessary to keep it?
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Andrei POPESCU
wrote:
> On Du, 22 iul 12, 15:41:16, lina wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, I don't have some basic understanding about samba,
>> will read something about it.
>> just a short quick question, is it necessary to keep it?
>
> Only you can tell since we don't know w
On Du, 22 iul 12, 15:41:16, lina wrote:
>
> Thanks, I don't have some basic understanding about samba,
> will read something about it.
> just a short quick question, is it necessary to keep it?
Only you can tell since we don't know what you use/need.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 7/22/2012 2:25 AM, lina wrote:
>
> Hi Lina,
Hi,
>
>> strangely my netstat showed my 139 and 445 ports are open.
>>
>> tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:445 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
>> tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:139
On 7/22/2012 2:25 AM, lina wrote:
Hi Lina,
> strangely my netstat showed my 139 and 445 ports are open.
>
> tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:445 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:139 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
These ports are used by Samba. If
88 matches
Mail list logo
