Re: ifconfig curiosity

2001-12-08 Thread Brian May
> "Karsten" == Karsten M Self writes: Karsten> Digging a bit deeper: advertisers and marketers stole the Karsten> traditional measures of storage: kilobyte, megabyte, Karsten> gigabyte, by imposing the interpretation of these as Karsten> powers of ten, rather than powers of tw

Re: ifconfig curiosity

2001-12-07 Thread Paul 'Baloo' Johnson
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Alan Shutko wrote: > Of course, my answer _was_ helpful... you'll find that tossing "MiB > standard" into google will get you the right answer. Tried it, didn't get useful responses. :o/ -- Baloo

Re: ifconfig curiosity

2001-12-07 Thread Craig Dickson
Karsten M. Self wrote: > Digging a bit deeper: advertisers and marketers stole the traditional > measures of storage: kilobyte, megabyte, gigabyte, by imposing the > interpretation of these as powers of ten, rather than powers of two. True, but only the computer industry ever used kilo-, mega-,

Re: ifconfig curiosity

2001-12-07 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 01:41:14PM -0800, Jeffrey W. Baker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Fri, 2001-12-07 at 12:44, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote: > > On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Alan Shutko wrote: > > > > > > uhm, what are "MiB"'s? > > > > > > One of the more stupid sounding standards to be foisted on the

Re: ifconfig curiosity

2001-12-07 Thread Craig Dickson
Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: > A MiB is a mibibyte, and a KiB is a kibibyte. Almost, except for spelling. It's "mebibyte", not "mibibyte". But "kibibyte" is correct. > MiB == 2^20 bytes, KiB == 2^10 bytes. By contrast, a MB, or > megabyte, == 10^6 bytes and a KB, or kilobyte, == 10^3 bytes. > This m

RE: ifconfig curiosity

2001-12-07 Thread Brooks R. Robinson
| > uhm, what are "MiB"'s? and here I thought they were "Men In Black"

Re: ifconfig curiosity

2001-12-07 Thread Jeffrey W. Baker
On Fri, 2001-12-07 at 12:44, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote: > On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Alan Shutko wrote: > > > > uhm, what are "MiB"'s? > > > > One of the more stupid sounding standards to be foisted on the public. > > That's great. How bout a helpful answer? A MiB is a mibibyte, and a KiB is a kibiby

Re: ifconfig curiosity

2001-12-07 Thread Alan Shutko
Paul 'Baloo' Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Alan Shutko wrote: > >> > uhm, what are "MiB"'s? >> >> One of the more stupid sounding standards to be foisted on the public. > > That's great. How bout a helpful answer? It's the IEC name for 1024x1024 bytes, also known as

Re: ifconfig curiosity

2001-12-07 Thread Paul 'Baloo' Johnson
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Alan Shutko wrote: > > uhm, what are "MiB"'s? > > One of the more stupid sounding standards to be foisted on the public. That's great. How bout a helpful answer? -- Baloo

Re: ifconfig curiosity

2001-12-06 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 04:17:39PM -0800, martin f krafft wrote: > seamus:~> /sbin/ifconfig | grep MiB > RX bytes:614070395 (585.6 MiB) TX bytes:125545699 (119.7 MiB) > RX bytes:34937878 (33.3 MiB) TX bytes:34937878 (33.3 MiB) > > uhm, what are "MiB"'s? Looking at the source, they'r

Re: ifconfig curiosity

2001-12-06 Thread Alan Shutko
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > uhm, what are "MiB"'s? One of the more stupid sounding standards to be foisted on the public. -- Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors! Good girls go to heaven, bad girls go everywhere.