On 23/12/11 13:20, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 15/12/11 20:56, perlj...@gmail.com wrote:
>> After a manual entry in /etc/hosts.deny
>>
>> ip didn't blocked
>>
>> ALL: 151.12.xxx.xxx
>>
>> I wonder why?
>>
>> I use denyhosts for automatic entries
>>
>> Thank you in advance
>>
>> Nikos
>>
>>
> Check
On 15/12/11 20:56, perlj...@gmail.com wrote:
> After a manual entry in /etc/hosts.deny
>
> ip didn't blocked
>
> ALL: 151.12.xxx.xxx
>
> I wonder why?
>
> I use denyhosts for automatic entries
>
> Thank you in advance
>
> Nikos
>
>
Check /etc/hosts.allow it has precedence over /etc/hosts.d
On 12/15/2011 01:40 PM, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 09:56:48AM GMT, perlj...@gmail.com wrote:
>> After a manual entry in /etc/hosts.deny
>>
>> ip didn't blocked
>>
>> ALL: 151.12.xxx.xxx
>>
>> I wonder why?
>
> What do you mean by didn't get blocked?
> Using what service/port?
>
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:56:48 +0200
perlj...@gmail.com wrote:
> After a manual entry in /etc/hosts.deny
>
> ip didn't blocked
>
> ALL: 151.12.xxx.xxx
>
> I wonder why?
>
Do a test without the x's, endind with just a dot
ALL: 151.12.
> I use denyhosts for automatic entries
>
> Thank you in
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 09:56:48AM GMT, perlj...@gmail.com wrote:
> After a manual entry in /etc/hosts.deny
>
> ip didn't blocked
>
> ALL: 151.12.xxx.xxx
>
> I wonder why?
What do you mean by didn't get blocked?
Using what service/port?
Does your service support tcp_wrappers?
> I use denyhost
can't you just do
100.100.100.
Ken
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matt
> Zagrabelny
> Sent: 29 March 2006 5:41pm
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: hosts.deny
>
>
> On Wed, 2
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 09:05 -0600, Jack Hale wrote:
> I am trying to block a whole subnet. (example
> 100.100.100.0-100.100.100.255).
> in my /etc/hosts.deny file I have placed this as
> 100.100.100.0/100.100.100.255.
> Is this the correct way to do this? I am using Shorewall for the
> firewall.
Jack Hale wrote:
I am trying to block a whole subnet. (example
100.100.100.0-100.100.100.255).
in my /etc/hosts.deny file I have placed this as
100.100.100.0/100.100.100.255.
Is this the correct way to do this? I am using Shorewall for the
firewall. I am new to this. Sorry for the stupidity.
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:32:34 +0200
Nikolai Hlubek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone :-)
>
> On one of my machines I'm running a zope server. This server should
> only be accessible from my LAN so I set:
>
> hosts.deny
> ALL: ALL
>
> The hosts.deny manual states:
> This denies all servic
Nikolai Hlubek wrote:
> On one of my machines I'm running a zope server. This server should only
> be accessible from my LAN so I set:
>
> hosts.deny
> ALL: ALL
...
> Ping and ssh connects are refused but the web services provided by zope
> are still accessible from the outside. Is this a bug or
Nikolai Hlubek napisał(a):
On one of my machines I'm running a zope server. This server should only
be accessible from my LAN so I set:
hosts.deny
ALL: ALL
The hosts.deny manual states:
This denies all service to all hosts, unless they are permitted access
by entries in the allow file.
Ping
Hello
Nikolai Hlubek (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> On one of my machines I'm running a zope server. This server should
> only be accessible from my LAN so I set:
>
> hosts.deny
> ALL: ALL
>
> The hosts.deny manual states:
> This denies all service to all hosts, unless they are permitted
> acc
Am Mon, 2002-11-25 um 15.39 schrieb Lance Hoffmeyer:
> I have a home network and I have been having
> certain IP's probe my samba ports. I want to deny
> all access to these IP's. Would I put some sort
> of commands in my hosts.deny file? If so, what?
RTM
$ cat /etc/hosts.deny
# /etc/h
Kenward Vaughan said:
I consider reinstalling the system, or can I tell how clean things
> are in some way to assess what the hell is going on?
>
if it were my system it would be a case for a reinstall. but I
would not reinstall until I was able to track down the source
of the problem(disk, contr
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 09:53:49PM -0700, Eric G. Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 08:41:16PM -0700, Kenward Vaughan wrote:
> > In today's system upgrade I got the following immediate message:
> >
> > ...
> > Preconfiguring packages ...
> > egrep: /etc/hosts.deny: Is a directory
> > fgrep:
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 08:41:16PM -0700, Kenward Vaughan wrote:
> In today's system upgrade I got the following immediate message:
>
> ...
> Preconfiguring packages ...
> egrep: /etc/hosts.deny: Is a directory
> fgrep: /etc/hosts.deny: Is a directory
> ...
>
> 'Tis true, and at least one other
-> >hosts.allow
-> >ALL: localhost,128.206.x.x : ALL
-> >
-> Whenever I've put an IP in, I always also add the mask, a la:
-> ALL :localhost, 128.206.0.0/255.255.0.0
->
-> AND LEAVE OFF THAT SECOND ALL!
->
-> >hosts.deny
-> >ALL: ALL
I likemore idea of one config file and use:
ALL: localh
>hosts.allow
>ALL: localhost,128.206.x.x : ALL
>
Whenever I've put an IP in, I always also add the mask, a la:
ALL :localhost, 128.206.0.0/255.255.0.0
AND LEAVE OFF THAT SECOND ALL!
>hosts.deny
>ALL: ALL
>
Thats what you want.
Paul
Andrew Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi.
> I've been trying to limit the incoming connection into my machine by
> trying to setup hosts.allow and hosts.deny, but I believe I've run into
> problem.
> hosts.allow
> ALL: localhost,128.206.x.x : ALL
>
> hosts.deny
> ALL: ALL
>
> Basicly, wh
On Mon, 8 Dec 1997, Ian Keith Setford wrote:
> Hi-
> I would like to configure my Debian box to accept telnet, ftp, and www
> connections. Right know I have my hosts.allow as ALL:ALL but I would like
> limit the connections to only those with my schools connections and my
> local LAN's machines.
>
On Mon, Dec 08, 1997 at 11:04:07PM -0600, Ian Keith Setford wrote:
>
> Hi-
>
> I would like to configure my Debian box to accept telnet, ftp, and www
> connections. Right know I have my hosts.allow as ALL:ALL but I would like
> limit the connections to only those with my schools connections and
21 matches
Mail list logo
