On 2023-02-04, Haines Brown wrote:
> - Forwarded message from Greg Wooledge -
>
> Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 08:57:30 -0500
> From: Greg Wooledge
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Fw: locating blocked port
>
> I finally managed to get jabref to run.
>
Your first post's termi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 02:01:18AM +0600, Evgeny wrote:
> Problems gone when i reinstalled libc6-dev, now hello world compiling fine,
> but the problem is that after removing lib6c-dev a lot of other packages
> was deleted and when I trying to install
Hi,
Evgeny wrote:
> any
> "bits/locale.h" among indlude files that you listed have already existed in
> my system. but g++ continue give me error message that there is no such file
> or directory
What do you get from
g++ -o test -H test.cpp
If i rename my local
/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu
Problems gone when i reinstalled libc6-dev, now hello world compiling fine,
but the problem is that after removing lib6c-dev a lot of other packages
was deleted and when I trying to install them back I have error (Unable to
correct problems, you have held broken packages)
Anyway, thanks a lot, I f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 01:04:05AM +0600, Evgeny wrote:
> Thanks all for answers, libc6-dev was installed. And more intresting, any
> "bits/locale.h" among indlude files that you listed have already existed in
> my system. but g++ continue give me erro
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 01:04:05AM +0600, Evgeny wrote:
> Thanks all for answers, libc6-dev was installed. And more intresting, any
> "bits/locale.h" among indlude files that you listed have already existed in
> my system. but g++ continue give me error message that there is no such
> file or direc
Thanks all for answers, libc6-dev was installed. And more intresting, any
"bits/locale.h" among indlude files that you listed have already existed in
my system. but g++ continue give me error message that there is no such
file or directory
even if I use -I/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/ flag or add
Hi,
i can compile the test program on my amd64 Debian 8.
Google and
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5834778/how-to-tell-where-a-header-file-is-included-from
caused me to run
$ g++ -H test.cpp
to see all included files.
Maybe it helps you to find what's missing on your system or where
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 09:17:32AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 07:11:28PM +0600, Evgeny wrote:
> > error: bits/locale.h: No such file or directory
>
> Make sure build-essential is installed.
>
> > #include
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 07:11:28PM +0600, Evgeny wrote:
> Dear all, i have some problems with , etc. libraries on
> my debian.
>
> I have pretty simple code:
>
> #include
>
> using namespace std;
>
> int main(void) {
>
> cout <
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 07:11:28PM +0600, Evgeny wrote:
> error: bits/locale.h: No such file or directory
Make sure build-essential is installed.
> #include
> ^
> compilation terminated.
Make sure the file uses Unix newline (line feed) terminators, and not
Microsoft's
Marc Auslander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A while ago I upgraded to etch from sarge. I now discover the g++ is
> missing. aptitude doesn't show the package. my sources.list points
> at
...
My dumb mistake.
aptitude search appears to be reg exp, so searching for g++ doesn't
work! Search fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/31/08 16:43, Marc Auslander wrote:
> A while ago I upgraded to etch from sarge. I now discover the g++ is
> missing. aptitude doesn't show the package. my sources.list points
> at
>
> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ etch main
> deb-src
Thanks - I was just out of date. It works now.
Tom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2/8/06, Thomas H. George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a occasional programmer I tried to recompile an old program I
> intended to expand. Although #include was entered before the
> start of main the g++ compiler did not recognize cin and cout. This
> seems so elementary it certainly shoul
On 2006-02-08T20:26:58-0500, Thomas H. George wrote:
> As a occasional programmer I tried to recompile an old program I
> intended to expand. Although #include was entered before the
> start of main the g++ compiler did not recognize cin and cout.
Add a "using namespace std;" or prefix each ci
On 2005-12-20, Heimdall Midgard penned:
>
> But surely in *n*x you can't assume what a file is on the basis of
> its extension?
>
Well, sometimes it's a good starting point. For example, one of my
vim configuration files has:
au BufNewFile,BufRead *.java call JavaBuildEnv()
--
monique
Ask sma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Heimdall Midgard wrote:
> I just noticed something weird with my (G)Vim installation
> when editing generic config files. The syntax highlighting
> colors appear wrong. Could somebody do a test to confirm if
> this is really a bug or just a misconfigur
2005/12/20, Paolo Pantaleo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2005/12/20, Joris Huizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Heimdall Midgard wrote:
> > > I just noticed something weird with my (G)Vim
> > > installation when editing generic config files. The
> > > syntax highlighting colors appear wrong. Could
> > > somebo
Heimdall Midgard wrote:
Note how addition of a pair of parentheses to Line 3 of the
second file "causes" Line 4 to be displayed in the right
"comment" color.
I can reproduce the behavior you were talking both in vim and gvim. But
I do not know anything about udev syntax, so cannot comment
2005/12/20, Joris Huizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Heimdall Midgard wrote:
> > I just noticed something weird with my (G)Vim installation
> > when editing generic config files. The syntax highlighting
> > colors appear wrong. Could somebody do a test to confirm if
> > this is really a bug or just a mi
Heimdall Midgard wrote:
I just noticed something weird with my (G)Vim installation
when editing generic config files. The syntax highlighting
colors appear wrong. Could somebody do a test to confirm if
this is really a bug or just a misconfiguration on my end?
To do the test, create two files bo
On 25-Jun-2002 Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2002 14:34:52 +0200
> "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>> That's because Debian tries to stick as closely as is reasonably
>> possible to official gcc releases. "2.96" (of which there appear to be
>> many versions
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002 14:34:52 +0200
"J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's because Debian tries to stick as closely as is reasonably
> possible to official gcc releases. "2.96" (of which there appear to be
> many versions which are difficult to distinguish) has a lot of issues;
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 21:06:37 -0500, Arun Madhurmohan wrote:
> I use debian linux at home and redhat linux (unfortunately) at work.
> Redhat comes with g++ 2.96
That isn't a formal gcc release; see http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-2.96.html .
(There are dissenting opinions as to its usefulness though, li
On 25-Jun-2002 Arun Madhurmohan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use debian linux at home and redhat linux (unfortunately) at work.
> Redhat comes with g++ 2.96 and that's what I use at work. I can't find an
> equivalent version of g++ on debian. I would prefer to work with the same
> version of g++ at home an
On 13 Feb 2002, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 10:31:13 +0100, Anders Lennartsson wrote:
> > But with g++3.0 it reports some errors. If I run with -v it displays all
> > the paths compiled in, which do seem ok. Why doesn't it find the correct
> > location of the include fil
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 10:31:13 +0100, Anders Lennartsson wrote:
> But with g++3.0 it reports some errors. If I run with -v it displays all
> the paths compiled in, which do seem ok. Why doesn't it find the correct
> location of the include files (which I believe is the problem)?
That is not the
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I upgraded my machine to potato but in compiling a c++
> program which before used to work with
>
> g++ -lg++ filename.cc,
>
> now I need
>
> g++ -I/usr/include/g++-2/ -lg++ filename.cc
-lg++ links libg++, which are auxiliary, non-standard
convenience-classes that
On 02-Aug-2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I upgraded my machine to potato but in compiling a c++
> program which before used to work with
>
geisha [~/testing/filebox] $ g++ -Wall -pedantic test.cc -o test
geisha [~/testing/filebox] $ ./test
I equals: 0
you *MAY* need to use -lstdc++, but that i
On Sun, Jul 23, 2000 at 08:41:41AM -0700, Nianwei Xing wrote:
>
> As for the netscape, it still doesn't work. I have
> check the status of bookmarks, I have write
> permission.
> Now I can add bookmarks when I am use the netscape,
> however, when I exit my machine and login it again,
> all of the
Hi, Ragga:
Thanks for your information!
I have make the g++ work for I forget to give the
directory ./
As for the netscape, it still doesn't work. I have
check the status of bookmarks, I have write
permission.
Now I can add bookmarks when I am use the netscape,
however, when I exit my machine and l
Nianwei Xing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, Debians:
> I have two problem with my new debian.
> 1. Afte I compile and link my c++ code with g++ , it
> generate a.out but I can not execute it. should I need
> to install some packages?
Do you get some error message ?
I can imagine 2 possibilitie
erasmo perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hi people!
>
> where can i download the latest (unstable) g++ compiler package for debian ?
g++ is currently in the process of a big change:
gcc-2.95.2 is the stable version, but it lacks a standard-conformant
c++-library. One is being developed, and sh
Um... never mind... I found it. (.C, not .c ... sheesh)
(thanks anyway :)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject:g++ identity crisis, slink
Date sent: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 11:54:54 -0400
>
> Hi, I'm runnin
On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 11:55:04 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, I'm running slink and I was trying to 'make' some c++ programs I
> was messing around with the other day and discovered that even
> though my Makefile says to use g++, make was using cc to compile
> the programs.
This smells
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 07:31:28 +0200, erasmo perez wrote:
> where can i download the latest (unstable) g++ compiler package for debian ?
ftp.debian.org:/debian/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/devel/g++*deb
HTH,
Ray
--
UNFAIR Term applied to advantages enjoyed by other people which we tried
t
Michiel Meeuwissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think there is something wrong with my g++ (using the latest version of
> frozen).
>
> If I make a file only containing
>
> #include
> main(){}
>
> or
>
> $include
>
> then:
>
> ~$ g++ test.cpp
> test.cpp:1: iostream: No such file or di
Dear Kevin
> dpkg -i foo bar seemed a little bit criptic to me. In case it was to you as
> well, you can just type
>
> dpkg -i g++*.deb libstdc++2.9-dev*.deb
>
> Both packages will be installed without any problem. I know this because I
> had
> the same question as you had, and this was the
dpkg -i foo bar seemed a little bit criptic to me. In case it was to you as
well, you can just type
dpkg -i g++*.deb libstdc++2.9-dev*.deb
Both packages will be installed without any problem. I know this because I had
the same question as you had, and this was the (successful) suggestion I was
Quoting Charles Kaufman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I am trying to install the version of g++ in stable, using
> dpkg. g++ depends on libstdc++2.9-dev and libstdc++2.9-dev depends
> on g++. dpkg will not allow the installation of
> one without the other, as in catch-22.
> Must the installation be force
On Thu, Aug 05, 1999 at 08:01:37 -0600, Robert Kerr wrote:
> can g++ (the egcs version) and g++272 coexist successfully?
No; the library packages they need conflict. g++272 was a crude hack to
allow package maintainers a backdoor for compiling old code.
> I'm using a slink system, and think tha
Hi,
On Tue, 6 Jul 1999, Jaycee wrote:
> linker, it says there are undefined references to char *crypt.
> This same program compiles perfectly under gcc.
> any suggestions?
>
char* crypt is not declared extern "C"?
OK
On Sat, Apr 17, 1999 at 11:52:19 +1200, Michael Beattie wrote:
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot open -lstdc++: No such file or directory
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> just checking my libs dir... no libstdc++.so.0 :
>
> /usr/lib/libstdc++-2-libc6.0-1-2.9.0.a
Erm, the only link that matters to the
> just checking my libs dir... no libstdc++.so.0 :
>
> /usr/lib/libstdc++-2-libc6.0-1-2.9.0.a
> /usr/lib/libstdc++-2-libc6.0-1-2.9.0.so
> /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.0-1.a.2 -> libstdc++-2-libc6.0-1-2.9.0.a
> /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.0-1.so.2 -> libstdc++-2-libc6.0-1-2.9.0.so
> /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.
On Fri, 16 Apr 1999, J.H.M. Dassen wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 23:11:56 +1200, Michael Beattie wrote:
> > In a configure script, this is the outcome:
>
> > configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C++ compiler
> > cannot create executables.
>
> Run configure with the '-v' ar
On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 23:11:56 +1200, Michael Beattie wrote:
> In a configure script, this is the outcome:
> configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C++ compiler
> cannot create executables.
Run configure with the '-v' argument, and show us the relevant parts of the
config.log
Jonathan Hayward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have had some difficulties with g++. When I run it, I get the
> following error message:
>
> /usr/lib/crt1.o(.text+0x36): undefined reference to `main'
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Are you sure you have a main() function in the program y
Hello,
> >I left the source as it was, but added some softlinks, like
> >/usr/include/X11/GL -> /usr/include/GL
>
> Me to, but I had to edit out some refs. to a /GL/GLw/ directory included
> file - the header file was actually under /GL, and Glw doesn't exist on
> my system.
I used softlinks thr
>Subject: Re: g++2.8, egcs, gcc 2.7.2, etc. - *very confused*
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Waller)
>Date: Tue, 8 Dec 1998 16:30:50 +1100 (EST)
>Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>From: Jiri Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Hello,
>
>> Over the weekend, I downlao
On Wed, Dec 09, 1998 at 00:13:16 -0500, Ed Cogburn wrote:
> > >Read /usr/doc/gcc/README.Debian .
> It didn't say *why* we have an apparent fork in compiler development.
It doesn't contain a full history of the free software movement either, as
that's out of scope for that document too.
> Since t
Martin Waller wrote:
>
> >
> >Read /usr/doc/gcc/README.Debian .
> >
>
> I did but was still confused :(
>
>
It didn't say *why* we have an apparent fork in compiler development.
Since the gcc compiler is at the core of Linux (behind only the kernel
itself in importance), having a semi-
Hello,
> Over the weekend, I downlaoded V 1.20 onto /usr/local/.
Did the same last night.
> I tried compiling it and after finding out that I needed all the OpenGl
> stuff and isntalling that to (V. annoying by the way - had even to edit some
> of the source code to get rid of those probelms)
>
>Read /usr/doc/gcc/README.Debian .
>
I did but was still confused :(
>> Being naive enough to try anything, and having heard of all sorts of
>> problems with egcs and g++, I decided to scrap g++2.8 and put
g++2.7.2 on.
>> (I had egcs 2.90.29, dated 19980515).
>
>g++2.7.2 is intended only for
On Mon, Dec 07, 1998 at 01:50:48 -0800, Martin Waller wrote:
> I am stunningly confused about the whole c and c++ suite thing that's
> going on (I'm still in HAMM - it's *not * the __register_frame_info
> stuff!).
Read /usr/doc/gcc/README.Debian .
> Being naive enough to try anything, and havin
>
> As part of a homework assignment I've written a little program to do
> arithmetic with fractions and mixed numbers, and I wanted to benchmark the
> speed of various algorithms for finding 'gcd,' the greatest common divisor.
> Not knowing how to do the timing piece, I started playing with getti
Bob Bernstein wrote:
> As part of a homework assignment I've written a little program to do
> arithmetic with fractions and mixed numbers, and I wanted to benchmark the
> speed of various algorithms for finding 'gcd,' the greatest common divisor.
> Not knowing how to do the timing piece, I started
On Tue, Sep 15, 1998 at 04:29:39PM -0500, Matt Garman wrote:
>
>
> While working on some C++ code for a programming assignment, I got the
> following error:
>
> /usr/lib/crt1.o(.text+0x36): undefined reference to `main'
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>
> And that is simply after typing "
> While working on some C++ code for a programming assignment, I got the
> following error:
>
> /usr/lib/crt1.o(.text+0x36): undefined reference to `main'
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>
> And that is simply after typing "g++ .cc"
First, make sure you have a function called main (and it'
Yes, g++ works just fine. Please disregard my previous
messages on this and sorry for the clutter.
Art
On Sun, Sep 06, 1998 at 04:00:04PM -0600, Art Lemasters wrote:
> Thanks to Alan Su and Marcus Brinkman for correcting
> me in regards to g++. I did not have it installed on this
> syst
>
> How do I fix this? What's wrong?
>
> bash-2.00$ g++ --help
> ld: warning: libm.so.5, needed by /usr/lib/libg++.so, may conflict with
> libm.so.6
> /lib/libm.so.5: warning: erfl is not implemented and will always fail
> /usr/lib/crt1.o(.text+0x36): undefined reference to `main'
> /lib/libm.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, writ
es:
>On Thu, 10 Jul 1997, Oliver Elphick wrote:
>
>> No-one has attempted an answer to this yet; if you have any ideas,
>> please let me know!
>>
>Don't know what this publib stuff is (just running dpkg -S
>/usr/include/publib [ah see, high-level
Hi
On Thu, 10 Jul 1997, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 1997 16:49:31 +0100
> From: Oliver Elphick
> To: debian-user@lists.DEBIAN.org
> Subject: g++ / ld / publib linking problem
> Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 1997 16:47:47 +
> Resent-From: debian-user@lists.DEBIAN.org
> Resent-cc: re
On Thu, 10 Jul 1997, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> No-one has attempted an answer to this yet; if you have any ideas,
> please let me know!
>
Don't know what this publib stuff is (just running dpkg -S
/usr/include/publib [ah see, high-level functions]), but the problem is
shining from your descriptio
If you get the GNU source you can build a cross-compiler, by
specifying the right arguements to the configure script.
I built a gcc that produced ELF binaries for Linux on a SprcStation
that way...
John Foster
On Thu, 5 Jun 1997, Lars Hallberg wrote:
> Hello
>
> Is it posably (whit debian pack
Jeff Shilt wrote:
>Thanks for the help - it does compile with g++ instead of gcc, but the
>executable produced isn't d
>oing anything. Here's what i'm doing:
>
>//test.c
>#include
>
>main(){
> cout << "Hello there.";
>}
>
>The test file doesn't print out anything when I run it.
>
>Also, I was w
>Thanks for the help - it does compile with g++ instead of gcc, but the
>executable produced isn't doing anything. Here's what i'm doing:
>
>//test.c
>#include
>
>main(){
> cout << "Hello there.";
>}
>
>The test file doesn't print out anything when I run it.
Append a \n to your string. Or inc
At 10:23 PM 3/21/97 -0500, Jeff Shilt wrote:
>Thanks for the help - it does compile with g++ instead of gcc, but the
executable produced isn't doing anything. Here's what i'm doing:
>
>//test.c
Don't call it "test".
-- Matt
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hamish Moffatt writes
:
> On Mar 03, 1997 at 10:23:30PM -0500, Jeff Shilt wrote:
> > Thanks for the help - it does compile with g++ instead of gcc, but the exec
->utable produced isn't doing anything. Here's what i'm doing:
> >
> > //test.c
> > #include
> >
> > m
On Mar 03, 1997 at 10:23:30PM -0500, Jeff Shilt wrote:
> Thanks for the help - it does compile with g++ instead of gcc, but the
> executable produced isn't doing anything. Here's what i'm doing:
>
> //test.c
> #include
>
> main(){
> cout << "Hello there.";
> }
>
> The test file doesn't prin
On Fri, 21 Mar 1997, Jeff Shilt wrote:
> //test.c
>
> The test file doesn't print out anything when I run it.
try typing 'which test' and find out what program your really running
then type 'man test' to see what it does.
Then give your program a new name.
Time flies like arrows, but fruit fl
>
> Hello,
>
>
> I am still Debian1.1 - compiling a C++ program, which used to
> compile cleanly only a few weeks ago, gives me the following
> error message:
> /lib/libm.so.5: undefined reference to '__getfpucw'
Well, if you are pure Debian-1.1, and didn't upgrade anything between
"a few
This may be way off, but some of us have trouble loading Linux from
floppy if the cache is turned on. Try turning off cache and see if the
problem goes away.
Typically, the cache issue shows up while the kernel is being
decompressed, not during the initial boot. The solution given below by
Heiko
73 matches
Mail list logo
