-- Charlie Reiman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Wednesday, 11 December 2002, 01:08 PM -0800):
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Matthew Weier O'Phinney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 12:08 PM
>
> > I used to compile my kernels by hand, as it spe
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Weier O'Phinney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 12:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: enabling apm on laptop
>
> I used to compile my kernels by hand, as it sped up the boot
-- Charlie Reiman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Wednesday, 11 December 2002, 11:56 AM -0800):
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Matthew Weier O'Phinney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 10:45 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PR
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Weier O'Phinney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 10:45 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: enabling apm on laptop
>
>
> -- Charlie Reiman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> (on Wedne
-- Simon Tod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Wednesday, 11 December 2002, 05:15 PM +):
> Okay, so 'uname -r' yields 2.4.19 and modprobe does
> exist (wasn't running it as root...) but 'modprobe
> apm' yields the response modprobe: Can't locate module
> apm. Now I have apm installed and it's in th
-- Charlie Reiman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Wednesday, 11 December 2002, 09:06 AM -0800):
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Matthew Weier O'Phinney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 7:20 AM
> >
> > -- Pigeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> > (on Wednesday, 11
Okay, so 'uname -r' yields 2.4.19 and modprobe does
exist (wasn't running it as root...) but 'modprobe
apm' yields the response modprobe: Can't locate module
apm. Now I have apm installed and it's in the file
/etc/modules BUT I cannot find a compiled file apm.o
in /lib/modules/2.4.19 or any of its
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Weier O'Phinney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 7:20 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: enabling apm on laptop
>
>
> -- Pigeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> (on Wednesday, 11
-- Pigeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Wednesday, 11 December 2002, 05:22 AM +):
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:24:01PM +, Simon Tod wrote:
> > I've had several different response to this problem...
> > I did run lilo after altering lilo.conf and already
> > have apmd installed - I get a 'No
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:24:01PM +, Simon Tod wrote:
> I've had several different response to this problem...
> I did run lilo after altering lilo.conf and already
> have apmd installed - I get a 'No APM support in
> kernel' message with this as well.
> I don't get anywhere with the 'modprobe
I've had several different response to this problem...
I did run lilo after altering lilo.conf and already
have apmd installed - I get a 'No APM support in
kernel' message with this as well.
I don't get anywhere with the 'modprobe apm'
suggestions (don't know what modprobe is and can't
find it to i
-- D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Tuesday, 10 December 2002, 07:41 AM -0800):
>
> --- Simon Tod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Okay, so this isn't enough to solve the problem.
> > I've
> > added apm on a new line to /etc/modules and added
> > append="apm=on" to lilo.conf (b4 running lilo...)
> >
--- Simon Tod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, so this isn't enough to solve the problem.
> I've
> added apm on a new line to /etc/modules and added
> append="apm=on" to lilo.conf (b4 running lilo...)
> BUT
> /proc/apm doesn't exist, so when I try and run apm I
> get the message 'No APM support
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002 19:40:46 -0500
"Darryl L. Pierce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2002.12.09 19:07 "Joyce, Matthew" wrote:
> > > Okay, so this isn't enough to solve the problem. I've
> > > added apm on a new line to /etc/modules and added
> > > append="apm=on" to lilo.conf (b4 running lilo...)
On 2002.12.09 19:07 "Joyce, Matthew" wrote:
> Okay, so this isn't enough to solve the problem. I've
> added apm on a new line to /etc/modules and added
> append="apm=on" to lilo.conf (b4 running lilo...) BUT
> /proc/apm doesn't exist, so when I try and run apm I get the
> message 'No APM support i
>
> Okay, so this isn't enough to solve the problem. I've
> added apm on a new line to /etc/modules and added
> append="apm=on" to lilo.conf (b4 running lilo...) BUT
> /proc/apm doesn't exist, so when I try and run apm I get the
> message 'No APM support in kernel'. Am I going to have to
> re
-- Simon Tod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Monday, 09 December 2002, 08:58 PM +):
> Okay, so this isn't enough to solve the problem. I've
> added apm on a new line to /etc/modules and added
> append="apm=on" to lilo.conf (b4 running lilo...) BUT
> /proc/apm doesn't exist, so when I try and run
Okay, so this isn't enough to solve the problem. I've
added apm on a new line to /etc/modules and added
append="apm=on" to lilo.conf (b4 running lilo...) BUT
/proc/apm doesn't exist, so when I try and run apm I
get the message 'No APM support in kernel'. Am I going
to have to reconfigure the kernel
On 2002.12.09 12:12 Simon Tod wrote:
Bit of a simple newbie question I fear..
I've got Woody up and running on my laptop but must have missed
something during installation as I don't have APM enabled in the
kernel; I tried to get a GNOME battery monitor applet running without
success, and th
19 matches
Mail list logo
