On Sat, 4 Dec 1999 16:16:24 -0500 (EST), you wrote:
>I would not recomend mixing slink and potato sources. Early in the
>potato development this was possible as slink and potato were not too
>different and only a few files were updated. But now most files depend
>in some way on libc6 v2.1 or perl
and only a few files were updated. But now most files depend
in some way on libc6 v2.1 or perl5.005 and will cause major problems if
they are installed and you are not willing to upgrade yet.
*- On 4 Dec, Bryan Scaringe wrote about "RE: effect of having stable and
unstable list
On Sat, Dec 04, 1999 at 03:32:45PM -0500, Bryan Scaringe wrote:
> I have seen many examples on this list of people putting entries in
> sources.list
> for both stable and unstable trees at the same time. How does apt/dselect
> handle this? Would an "apt-get upgrade" always pull from stable or un
Opps,
When in doubt, I should read the man pages.
Looks like apt will go through sources.list, and will install the package from
the first source it finds. if I am reading "man sources.list" correctly :)
Bryan
On 04-Dec-1999 Pollywog wrote:
>
> On 04-Dec-1999 Bryan Scaringe wrote:
>> I
On 04-Dec-1999 Bryan Scaringe wrote:
> I have seen many examples on this list of people putting entries in
> sources.list
> for both stable and unstable trees at the same time. How does apt/dselect
> handle this? Would an "apt-get upgrade" always pull from stable or
> unstable?
>
> Thanks in ad
5 matches
Mail list logo
