Re: apt-get & byte compile problem

2000-08-11 Thread Christian Lynbech on satellite
What packages are we talking about? (You can use `dpkg -S' to match a particular file to its package). Some of the larger emacs packages has the .el files in separate packages in order not to needlessly swamp the system. This includes emacs itself. ---+--

Re: apt-get & byte compile problem

2000-08-03 Thread Peter Mickle
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I really doubt that any files are being deleted. Usually, .el > files stay put in someplace like > > /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/ > > and byte-compiled versions go in: > > /usr/share/emacs/19.34/site-lisp/ > /usr/share/emacs/20.6/site-lisp

Re: apt-get & byte compile problem

2000-08-02 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Peter Mickle wrote: > A few weeks ago, while upgrading from slink to potato, during the > install process, I answered "yes" to a prompt to byte compile the > newly installed files. Since then, whenever I have installed new > packages (apt-get -install or apt-get -update -dist-upgrade) the > files

RE: apt-get & byte compile problem

2000-08-02 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 02-Aug-2000 Peter Mickle wrote: > A few weeks ago, while upgrading from slink to potato, during the > install process, I answered "yes" to a prompt to byte compile the > newly installed files. Since then, whenever I have installed new > packages (apt-get -install or apt-get -update -dist-upgrad