On 18/09/11 13:59, Chris Brennan wrote:
> So I decided to try and play with apt-build and I got the following
> which I can't seem to solve or figure out how to solve lol
>
>
>
>
> Any idea's cause I'm stumped!
apt-build requires src entries in /etc/apt/sources.list
NOTE: in my experience yo
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011 23:59:13 -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
>
> > So I decided to try and play with apt-build and I got the following
> > which I can't seem to solve or figure out how to solve lol
>
> (...)
>
> I don't know how apt-build works nor do
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011 23:59:13 -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
> So I decided to try and play with apt-build and I got the following
> which I can't seem to solve or figure out how to solve lol
(...)
I don't know how apt-build works nor does, but let me make some
observations about the log...
> W: F
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 12:44:05AM +0100, Matt Miller wrote:
>
> I'm new to apt-build, so I may be missing something simple.
>
You might also want to try the instructions in my package customization
HOWTO:
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto/howtos/debcustomize
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C
Adam Porter wrote:
> For anyone who would like to use apt-build more, but has run into bugs
> dealing with differing binary and source "Version" fields, there is a nice
> patch available at bug 332594:
> I don't know why the patch hasn't been released in an updated apt-build
> package yet, but I
Message-
> From: S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Mon 9/25/2006 12:49 PM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: apt-build
>
> On Monday 25 September 2006 11:54, Deepak Kumar Tripathi wrote:
> > Hi i am using apt-build.
> > and i wrot
Title: RE: apt-build
its a very good .
Deepak Tripathi ..---.
Open Source Developer / \
[EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 25 September 2006 11:54, Deepak Kumar Tripathi wrote:
> Hi i am using apt-build.
> and i wrote two patch for it also one for show tha catch package and one
> for search.
>
cool, then, what is ur feelings about apt-build.
> anyway i am workin
Title: RE: apt-build
Hi i am using apt-build.
and i wrote two patch for it also one for show tha catch package and one for search.
anyway i am working for changing the comilation script for different -different architecture.
Thanks
Deepak Tripathi ..---.
Open Source Developer
On 9/23/06, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 10:58:31PM +0600, S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu) wrote:> any body here using apt-build ??> i am interested to use it to get optimized package for my em64t (i don't> like amd64 unoffical )
Well, em64t is just Intel's name for a
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 10:58:31PM +0600, S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu) wrote:
> any body here using apt-build ??
> i am interested to use it to get optimized package for my em64t (i don't
> like amd64 unoffical )
Well, em64t is just Intel's name for amd64. It is their way of trying
to avoid losing face
I have also tried it, but I stopped using it because apt-build was not able to download a lot of sourcecode. I also could not find much information about the tool.Ben2006/4/13, S. M. Ibrahim <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:On Wednesday 12 April 2006 13:04, Adam Porter wrote:
> S. M. Ibrahim (lavluda) wrote:>
On Wednesday 12 April 2006 13:04, Adam Porter wrote:
> S. M. Ibrahim (lavluda) wrote:
> > Any body here useing apt-build. I am interested to know your openioun
> > about this tool.
>
> I think it has great, great potential, but it still has some important bugs
> that can make it unusable at times (
S. M. Ibrahim (lavluda) wrote:
> Any body here useing apt-build. I am interested to know your openioun
> about this tool.
I think it has great, great potential, but it still has some important bugs
that can make it unusable at times (like simply not finding a source
package, when $apt-get source$
mozilla-browser mozilla-mailnews give the same erros.
i've been looking in the mirror directory
(ftp://ftp.linux.pt/pub/mirrors/debian/pool/main/m/mozilla) and there is
a tar.gz file for mozilla 1.3.1
in the main/Sources.gz there is a reference to that file.
i've tried with fluxbox, xmms, gkr
On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 09:29, Joel Alexandre wrote:
> hi,
> i've just discovere apt-build.
>
> it works with some packages and with other it doesn't.
>
> example. xine-ui worked fine.
> gaim and mozilla i just get this error:
Not sure but I think that the mozilla package is empty and depends on
o
r 2002 3:48 AM
To: Travis Crump; David Pastern
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: apt-build and Athlon question
Thanks, Travis.
I can't look at anything written, I would have to take down the cooler and
reassemble my computer... better not. I don't want to destroy my processor.
joerg
T
Thanks, Travis.
I can't look at anything written, I would have to take down the cooler and
reassemble my computer... better not. I don't want to destroy my processor.
joerg
T.C. wrote
>
> That is identical to my /proc/cpuinfo and I have an athlon-tbird. I
> know this by looking at the invoice
Joerg Johannes wrote:
> Hi everybody
>
> I just installed apt-build and gcc3.2 to get some packages recompiled
> Athlon-optimized. In the installation screen, it promts me for the processor
> I am going to optimize for:
> athlon
> athlon-tbird
> athlon-4
> athlon-xp
> athlon-mp
>
> How do I fi
19 matches
Mail list logo
