Re: To mirror a huge tree...

2009-07-17 Thread Johannes Wiedersich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote: > Paul E Condon wrote: >> On 2009-07-15_23:53:27, ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote: > [snip] >> So you have 600/630 = 95% of the job done. To finish, I suggest >> rsync starting with this as the destination of the copying.

Re: To mirror a huge tree...

2009-07-16 Thread ron.l.johnson
Paul E Condon wrote: > On 2009-07-15_23:53:27, ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote: [snip] > > So you have 600/630 = 95% of the job done. To finish, I suggest rsync > starting with > this as the destination of the copying. Even if the source data is changing a > bit > from day-to-day, I'm sure the

RE: To mirror a huge tree...

2009-07-16 Thread David Christensen
ron.l.johnson wrote: > I've been a big FW fan for many years. My backups, though, have only > been (because of compression) in the 70-85GB range. 70-85 MB/s (?) using Firewire II (800 Mbps)? I am able to get ~40 MB/s on Firewire I (400 Mbps). > But this mirror was 630GB, and along around 600G

Re: To mirror a huge tree...

2009-07-16 Thread Paul E Condon
On 2009-07-15_23:53:27, ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote: > David Christensen wrote: > > Ron Johnson wrote: > > > ... external USB hard drive, I'm getting a consistent 30MBps, > > > ... is 30MBps about as good as I can get from the combination of the > > > USB software and hardware? > > > > 30 MB/

Re: To mirror a huge tree...

2009-07-16 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 07:39:04PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > is it more efficient to use tar, rsync or "cp -r"? cp -r I assume that you need copy all the data. If you can avoid copying, rsync can, of course be (much?) faster, depending on the saving. However the mere work it ddoes for scanning

RE: To mirror a huge tree...

2009-07-15 Thread ron.l.johnson
David Christensen wrote: > Ron Johnson wrote: > > ... external USB hard drive, I'm getting a consistent 30MBps, > > ... is 30MBps about as good as I can get from the combination of the > > USB software and hardware? > > 30 MB/s is good for USB. You need Firewire, eSATA, or an internal drive >

Re: To mirror a huge tree...

2009-07-14 Thread Mark Allums
Ron Johnson wrote: is it more efficient to use tar, rsync or "cp -r"? [snip] Or is 30MBps about as good as I can get from the combination of the USB software and hardware? USB is pretty lousy for speed, partly because it is hub-based and has overhead. USB 3 will be very fast, though.

Re: To mirror a huge tree...

2009-07-14 Thread Alex Samad
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 08:04:02PM -0700, David Christensen wrote: > Ron Johnson wrote: > > ... external USB hard drive, I'm getting a consistent 30MBps, > > ... is 30MBps about as good as I can get from the combination of the > > USB software and hardware? > > 30 MB/s is good for USB. You need

RE: To mirror a huge tree...

2009-07-14 Thread David Christensen
Ron Johnson wrote: > ... external USB hard drive, I'm getting a consistent 30MBps, > ... is 30MBps about as good as I can get from the combination of the > USB software and hardware? 30 MB/s is good for USB. You need Firewire, eSATA, or an internal drive to go faster. David -- To UNSUBSCRI