On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 03:30:11 +0200, Oki DZ wrote:
> I forgot, I have these settings too:
> echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward echo "1" >
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syncookies echo "1" >
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_abort_on_overflow echo "600" >
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_k
I forgot, I have these settings too:
echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syncookies
echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_abort_on_overflow
echo "600" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_keepalive_time
echo "60" > /proc/sys/net/
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 05:37:41PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> Please post more information. Software used, versions, timing, etc.
Here we go.
bdg:~# uname -a
Linux bdg 2.4.20-lkcd #3 Tue Jul 1 12:45:14 WIT 2003 i686 unknown unknown
GNU/Linuxbdg:~# more /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_i
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 07:12:01AM +0700, Oki DZ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On every megabyte in swapspace, how much does it take the space in the
> memory (RAM)? Is the two times the amount of memory rule basically the
> maximum? Problem is, I keep getting "Out of socket memory" error, and
> usually the
-Original Message-
From: Karl E. Jorgensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 6:17 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Swapfiles
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 08:44:16AM -0400, Smith, Brian N. wrote:
> >John Hasler wrote
> >I wrote:
> >> Ex
Joe Bouchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 10:34:54PM -0500, Shyamal Prasad wrote:
> > "Oki" == Oki DZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Oki> Hi, On a 128Mbytes machine, how much swap space can it
> > Oki> handle? Would it be all right to assign it 384Mbytes?
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 08:44:16AM -0400, Smith, Brian N. wrote:
> >John Hasler wrote
> >I wrote:
> >> Executables, being read-only, are mapped directly from disk and never
> >> use any swap at all. Only data gets mapped to swap.
>
> >Karsten writes:
> >> Is this a GNU/Linux thing or a more gener
> >> Executables, being read-only, are mapped directly from disk and never
> >> use any swap at all. Only data gets mapped to swap.
> I am a little puzzled by the comment "executables do not use swap" and I
> have to admit computer design is not my forte.
You need swap for data because the compu
>John Hasler wrote
>I wrote:
>> Executables, being read-only, are mapped directly from disk and never
>> use any swap at all. Only data gets mapped to swap.
>Karsten writes:
>> Is this a GNU/Linux thing or a more general Unix/POSIX thing?
>Neither. It's a virtual-memory thing. It's the obvi
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 10:34:54PM -0500, Shyamal Prasad wrote:
> "Oki" == Oki DZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Oki> Hi, On a 128Mbytes machine, how much swap space can it
> Oki> handle? Would it be all right to assign it 384Mbytes?
>
> Yes.
>
> I typically assign twice as much swa
rg
> Subject: Re: Swapfiles
>
>
> But I don't remember clearly if they were able to do paging on 286
> systems.
> They were working to support the 386 while I was working there, maybe they
> only
> had paging on 386, I don't know. I do seem to re
I used to do tech support for Microport System V/AT. It was Unix System V
ported to 80286 IBM AT's.
When I started work there, Microport had swapping. A program would be read into
memory in its entirety, or it would be disk resident. It wasn't paged. A
program's memory was swapped out to d
I remember `demand paging' on the PDP-11, which predates the VAX.
--
Sincerely,
David Smead
http://www.amplepower.com.
On 17 Apr 2002, John Hasler wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Executables, being read-only, are mapped directly from disk and never
> > use any swap at all. Only data gets mapped to swap
I wrote:
> Executables, being read-only, are mapped directly from disk and never
> use any swap at all. Only data gets mapped to swap.
Karsten writes:
> Is this a GNU/Linux thing or a more general Unix/POSIX thing?
Neither. It's a virtual-memory thing. It's the obvious thing to do as
soon as y
on Tue, Apr 16, 2002, John Hasler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Karsten writes:
> > Swap is there for programs that are, er, swapped.
>
> Executables, being read-only, are mapped directly from disk and never
> use any swap at all. Only data gets mapped to swap.
Hmm...interesting.
References?
Your MACHINE MEM X 2 = Your SWAP SPACE
thanks,
louie miranda (axis0.ath.cx)
--
Security Is A Series Of Well-Defined Steps
chmod -R 0 / ; and smile :)
- Original Message -
From: "Oki DZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 16,
Karsten writes:
> Swap is there for programs that are, er, swapped.
Executables, being read-only, are mapped directly from disk and never use
any swap at all. Only data gets mapped to swap.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
on Tue, Apr 16, 2002, Oki DZ ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On a 128Mbytes machine, how much swap space can it handle? Would it be all
> right to assign it 384Mbytes?
I tend toward 2-3 times physical RAM for swap, as swap partitions, on
the following basis:
- Despite arguments that as
begin Oki DZ quotation:
>
> On a 128Mbytes machine, how much swap space can it handle? Would it be all
> right to assign it 384Mbytes?
Short answer: yes.
Long answer:
http://www.tldp.org/LDP/sag/swap-allocation.html
Of special interest would be this line:
"If your calculated swap space is v
"Oki" == Oki DZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Oki> Hi, On a 128Mbytes machine, how much swap space can it
Oki> handle? Would it be all right to assign it 384Mbytes?
Yes.
I typically assign twice as much swap as RAM, I no longer remember the
rationale behind it, but there's nothing wron
MRZ said:
> With the price of RAM being what it is, I recently upgraded my
> potato box to by 512MB ram. So I now have roughly 640MB RAM with a
> 256MB swapfile.
>
> Now that I have this much physical memory I was wondering if I
> could drop the swapfile altogether and reclaim some HD space for
>
MRZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With the price of RAM being what it is, I recently upgraded my potato box to
> by 512MB ram.
> So I now have roughly 640MB RAM with a 256MB swapfile.
>
> Now that I have this much physical memory I was wondering if I could drop
> the swapfile altogether and rec
22 matches
Mail list logo
