On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 11:35:06AM +, Florian Dorpmueller wrote:
> Until yet I haven?t found any negative consequences. If you don?t want
> to use it any longer you can simply remove it without fearings. BTW:
> The best performance gain I got with oooprelink which made the
> starting process of
On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 12:26 +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
[snip]
> On a slow machine, I've noticed very slight improvements (slight enough
> to be imagined) with C++ apps (the KDE suite for example), that didn't
> quite make it usable enough.
[snip]
Thanks very much to you and to Florian for the repli
I wonder if anyone with experience of installing and using prelink would
tell me whether they've found it worthwhile or not. Also, is the process
irrevocable in practice, or can I back out and uninstall if it doesn't
work that well?
I am using prelink regurlarly on my installation (prelink -avm
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 11:56:04AM +0100, Mark Crean wrote:
> I wonder if anyone with experience of installing and using prelink
> would tell me whether they've found it worthwhile or not. Also, is the
> process irrevocable in practice
On a slow machine, I've noticed very slight improvements (slig
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 02:30:21PM +0200, Ilkka Lindroos wrote:
> I'm new to all this prelinking stuff. I installed the prelink package,
> but is that all I have to do? Are the any problems I should be aware
> of?
I know nothing of prelinking, but a quite look at the package and it
appears that yo
5 matches
Mail list logo
