On Wednesday 27 November 2002 07:29, Gary Maxwell wrote:
> Happy holidays!
>
> Does anyone know whether or not the latest Debian release has support
> for the Pentium 4 SIS650 chipset? I haven't found one distribution
> yet that does.
>
> Thanks!
>
> GM
You can try http://www.winischhofer.net for
On Wednesday 27 November 2002 10:29, Gary Maxwell wrote:
> Happy holidays!
>
> Does anyone know whether or not the latest Debian release has support
> for the Pentium 4 SIS650 chipset? I haven't found one distribution yet
> that does.
>
> Thanks!
>
> GM
What do you mean vy "Pentium 4 SIS650" ?. I
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 12:22:09PM -0800, ben wrote:
> i've actually found "pentium" to still be the safest bet, even on amd
> machines, and the optimization for any particular cpu is rarely reliable,
> anyway. for quite a while, "pentium" sucked and 386 was the only reliable
> option. selecting
On Monday 14 January 2002 07:13 am, Holger Rauch wrote:
> Hi Karl!
>
> Thanks for your quick reply!
>
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
> > [...]
> > Yep. I guess that you ask because it mentions i386. This i386 refers to
> > the *architecture* i386 (i.e. to the i386 processor and its
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 04:13:47PM +0100, Holger Rauch wrote:
| Hi Karl!
|
| Thanks for your quick reply!
|
| On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
|
| > [...]
| > Yep. I guess that you ask because it mentions i386.
I thought he was asking because the id of the chip jumped a lot to
codd
Hi Karl!
Thanks for your quick reply!
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
> [...]
> Yep. I guess that you ask because it mentions i386. This i386 refers to
> the *architecture* i386 (i.e. to the i386 processor and its offspawn).
Ok, but what option do I have to select in the menu entr
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 03:12:55PM +0100, Holger Rauch wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Are Pentium 4 processors supported by a 2.2.20 kernel out-of-the-box?
Yep. I guess that you ask because it mentions i386. This i386 refers to
the *architecture* i386 (i.e. to the i386 processor and its offspawn).
> If not,
t;Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alexander Isacson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 7:56 AM
Subject: Re: Pentium 4
> Just to add my 2 cents...
>
> > I'm about to buy a new computer. I have been offer
Just to add my 2 cents...
> I'm about to buy a new computer. I have been offered a
> really good deal on a P4 system.
> But since the architecture is so different from previous
> pentiums I am a little hecitant.
Unless you've been offered a REALLY good deal, it's
likely worse than the cost of
aart 2001 21:34
To: Alexander Isacson
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Pentium 4
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Alexander Isacson wrote:
> Will I have to recompile all major components in order to get decent
> speed with the p4?
Recompiling won't help; there's no P4-optimizing
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Alexander Isacson wrote:
> Will I have to recompile all major components in order to get decent
> speed with the p4?
Recompiling won't help; there's no P4-optimizing GCC. The P4 is actually
respectable at the sort of bit shoveling that characterizes "average"
applications -
Alex,
I highly recommend the AMD K7 chips. IF your short on cash get an ASUS A7V
or an ABIT KT7A, these boards are very nice. I am using an ABIT KT7A-RAID
for Windows, but am Using an ASUS A7V here at work with Debian on it. My
Duron 800 at home kicks the crap out of any P3 on the market and it
Go to tomshardware.com and look at his comparisons of P4s and K7s (in the CPU
guide). Tom seems to think that an athlon 1200MHz is better than a P4 1500MHz.
The P4 has a horrible FPU, so don't do any scientific calculations on it, unless
you optimize the code for SSE (which will make it pretty fast
13 matches
Mail list logo
