Re: pgp question

1999-09-11 Thread Martin Fluch
On Sat, 11 Sep 1999, Peter Palfrader aka Weasel wrote: > I'm a bit puzzled about the validy of keys that pgp (6.5.1) tells me. I don't trust pgp 6.5.1. Martin -- For public PGP-key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: pgp question

1999-09-11 Thread Peter Palfrader aka Weasel
On Sat, Sep 11, 1999 at 10:08:09PM -, Pollywog wrote: > You exchanged passphrases?? I don't think you should do that. > Your passphrase is for your own use when you encrypt or sign something. oops, fingerprints :) -- Weasel http://www.cosy.sbg.ac.at/~ppalfrad/ PGP e

RE: pgp question

1999-09-11 Thread Pollywog
On 11-Sep-99 Peter Palfrader aka Weasel wrote: > I'm a fairly new pgp user and hope that the gurus here can bring some > light into my dark. > > I'm a bit puzzled about the validy of keys that pgp (6.5.1) tells me. > > Here's what I have: > KeyID Trust Validity User ID > 0x... margina

RE: PGP question

1999-02-23 Thread Christopher J. Morrone
On Tue, 23 Feb 1999, Pollywog wrote: > > On 23-Feb-99 Stephen Pitts wrote: > > Reply-To: > > This is just out of curiosity..not meant to be flamebait :-) > > Those of you who PGP sign your messages, why do you do it? > > I've looked into getting PGP several times, and I have a PGP- > > compliant

RE: PGP question

1999-02-23 Thread Pollywog
On 23-Feb-99 Stephen Pitts wrote: > Reply-To: > This is just out of curiosity..not meant to be flamebait :-) > Those of you who PGP sign your messages, why do you do it? > I've looked into getting PGP several times, and I have a PGP- > compliant mail-reader, but is there any advantage in signing

Re: PGP question

1999-01-26 Thread Joachim Trinkwitz
Daniel González Gasull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I'm still using PGP 2.6.3in, a modified version PGP > 2.6.3i. I'm gonna switch to GNU Privacy Guard. Now I > have no time. I think it's the best solution. You > can get it from http://www.d.shuttle.de/isil/gnupg . > Try the gpg Debian pac

Re: PGP question

1999-01-24 Thread Daniel González Gasull
Hi! "J.T. Wenting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I believe you are allowed to use the US version yourself if you live in > Canada, but any users who log in from outside the US or Canada will not be > allowed to do so. I think that in your case it would be best to use the > international version (w

Re: PGP question

1999-01-24 Thread John Hasler
J.T. Wenting writes: > I believe you are allowed to use the US version yourself if you live in > Canada, but any users who log in from outside the US or Canada will not > be allowed to do so. I think that in your case it would be best to use > the international version (www.pgpi.com). You are con

RE: PGP question

1999-01-24 Thread J.T. Wenting
I believe you are allowed to use the US version yourself if you live in Canada, but any users who log in from outside the US or Canada will not be allowed to do so. I think that in your case it would be best to use the international version (www.pgpi.com). J.T. Wenting [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.geoc

Re: pgp question

1998-07-29 Thread Martin Bialasinski
>> "HM" == Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: HM> [1:14am] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> pgp -ks ahpee [...] HM> Key is already signed by user ''. HM> This happens even if I try to sign my own key. pgp signs your own key by default, so they are already signed. I believ you also already signed a