Re: OT: WinLinux

2001-09-07 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Eric Richardson wrote: > Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > > > Damon Muller wrote: > > > > > Quoth Karsten M. Self, > > > > I'd recommend a tool such as Win4Lin over either of the prior > > > > suggestions. > > >> > > > The win4lin site does not seem to have released any patches or modules > > > for

Re: OT: WinLinux

2001-09-07 Thread Eric Richardson
Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > Damon Muller wrote: > > > Quoth Karsten M. Self, > > > I'd recommend a tool such as Win4Lin over either of the prior > > > suggestions. > >> > > The win4lin site does not seem to have released any patches or modules > > for any kernels newer than 2.4.5 (I think). > >

Re: OT: WinLinux

2001-09-06 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Damon Muller wrote: > Quoth Karsten M. Self, > > I'd recommend a tool such as Win4Lin over either of the prior > > suggestions. >> > The win4lin site does not seem to have released any patches or modules > for any kernels newer than 2.4.5 (I think). They released them a few weeks ago. I'm run

Re: OT: WinLinux

2001-09-05 Thread Damon Muller
Quoth Karsten M. Self, > I'd recommend a tool such as Win4Lin over either of the prior > suggestions. You're working from GNU/Linux to a lesser OS. You get > pretty full Win98 support, and the option to administer the box > centrally, without having to suffer through dual boots or reduced > perf

RE: OT: WinLinux

2001-09-05 Thread Brooks R. Robinson
> Please use postfix response. ? > > I'd recommend a tool such as Win4Lin over either of the prior > suggestions. You're working from GNU/Linux to a lesser OS. You get > pretty full Win98 support, and the option to administer the box > centrally, without having to suffer through dual b

Re: OT: WinLinux

2001-09-04 Thread Bud Rogers
On Tuesday 04 September 2001 12:03 pm, Brooks R. Robinson wrote: > You might want to look at VMWare ( www.vmware.com ). When running at full > screnn , it runs pretty well, and you can barely tell you not in native OS. I'm familiar with VMWare. I have had it running on this box. -- Bud Rogers

Re: OT: WinLinux

2001-09-04 Thread Karsten M. Self
@lists.debian.org > > Subject: Re: OT: WinLinux > > > > > > On Saturday 01 September 2001 20:24 pm, Jon Masters wrote: > > > > > Why could anyone want to install Corel/WinLinux when there is Progeny > > > GNU/Linux? > > > > Because my wife isn

RE: OT: WinLinux

2001-09-04 Thread Brooks R. Robinson
01 September, 2001 08:35 PM > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: OT: WinLinux > > > On Saturday 01 September 2001 20:24 pm, Jon Masters wrote: > > > Why could anyone want to install Corel/WinLinux when there is Progeny > > GNU/Linux? > > Because my wife

Re: OT: WinLinux

2001-09-01 Thread Bud Rogers
On Saturday 01 September 2001 20:24 pm, Jon Masters wrote: > Why could anyone want to install Corel/WinLinux when there is Progeny > GNU/Linux? Because my wife isn't ready to give up her Windows yet, but she has expressed interest in WinLinux. If that is a way to get her a few steps closer, th

Re: OT: WinLinux

2001-09-01 Thread Jon Masters
On 01 Sep 2001 21:19:24 -0400, Greg Buchanan wrote: > If you haven't already mentioned/explored it, CorelLinux might be worth > a look. http://www3.corel.com/ Why could anyone want to install Corel/WinLinux when there is Progeny GNU/Linux? Surely Progeny offers all the attractive features you wan

Re: OT: WinLinux

2001-09-01 Thread dman
| Bud Rogers wrote: | | This is totally OT for the list, but bear with me. | | My wife runs W98 on her PC. I've been trying to get her interested in Linux | for a couple of years now. As Linux in general and KDE in particular have | gotten more and more user friendly, she has gradually moved fr

Re: OT: WinLinux

2001-09-01 Thread Greg Buchanan
Bud Rogers wrote: > > This is totally OT for the list, but bear with me. > > My wife runs W98 on her PC. I've been trying to get her interested in Linux > for a couple of years now. As Linux in general and KDE in particular have > gotten more and more user friendly, she has gradually moved from