Re: Masquerading problems: squeeze via lenny

2010-01-07 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, You already solved this problem but ... But this explain where is the disconnect. On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 12:19:09AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Mon,04.Jan.10, 16:32:42, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 07:45:07PM +0100, Marc Schröder wrote: > > > its better t

[Solved] Re: Masquerading problems: squeeze via lenny

2010-01-05 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Sun,03.Jan.10, 10:30:18, Andrei Popescu wrote: [...] > The problem is that some websites work flawlessly from the squeeze box > and some stall. The same sites are ok from the lenny box. Here are Turned out it was a problem with Path MTU Discovery[1] and setting CLAMPMSS=YES in shorewall

Re: Masquerading problems: squeeze via lenny

2010-01-05 Thread Antonio Perez
Antonio Perez wrote: > which both work on port 80, filter the destination port 80 and compare. > hint: tcp.dstport==80 also you may add the dest IP or any other relevant factor to reduce noise: for wget http://www.google.com : tcp.dstport==80 and ip.addr==74.125.159.1/24 for http://www.

Re: Masquerading problems: squeeze via lenny

2010-01-05 Thread Antonio Perez
Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Tue,05.Jan.10, 03:53:22, Antonio Perez wrote: > >> You could start a Wireshark capture on both the LAN and the PPP before >> performing the wget command and compare both. > > I installed tshark (I only have ssh access as both machines are in a > different city) on the

Re: Masquerading problems: squeeze via lenny

2010-01-05 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Tue,05.Jan.10, 03:53:22, Antonio Perez wrote: > You could start a Wireshark capture on both the LAN and the PPP before > performing the wget command and compare both. I installed tshark (I only have ssh access as both machines are in a different city) on the gateway, but unfortunately I can'

Re: Masquerading problems: squeeze via lenny

2010-01-05 Thread Antonio Perez
Andrei Popescu wrote: > on the gateway in /etc/ppp/peers/provider and ifconfig ppp0 correctly > shows the new setting, but no change. Thanks for the hint though. Hi: You could start a Wireshark capture on both the LAN and the PPP before performing the wget command and compare both. -- Antonio

Re: Masquerading problems: squeeze via lenny

2010-01-04 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Sun,03.Jan.10, 12:14:37, Andrei Popescu wrote: > > > Have you checked IPV6 issues discussed recently on debian-devel? > > I just tried commenting out > > net.ipv6.bindv6only = 1 > > in /etc/sysctl.d/bindv6only.conf but no change. The Lenny box also has > IPV6_DISABLED=yes set in shorewall.c

Re: Masquerading problems: squeeze via lenny

2010-01-04 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Mon,04.Jan.10, 16:32:42, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 07:45:07PM +0100, Marc Schröder wrote: > > its better to setup a propper mtu size on the gateway. then all > > clients behind will work without extra modifications. > > Yes, if the problem is caused by a gateway you c

Re: Masquerading problems: squeeze via lenny

2010-01-03 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 07:45:07PM +0100, Marc Schröder wrote: > its better to setup a propper mtu size on the gateway. then all > clients behind will work without extra modifications. Yes, if the problem is caused by a gateway you control, this is the root cause fix. This is done, as I und

Re: Masquerading problems: squeeze via lenny

2010-01-03 Thread Marc Schröder
its better to setup a propper mtu size on the gateway. then all clients behind will work without extra modifications. marc Am Sonntag 03 Januar 2010 13:02:54 schrieb Osamu Aoki: > On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 12:03:34PM +0100, Marc Schröder wrote: > > i think your problem is mtu fragmentation. > > >

Re: Masquerading problems: squeeze via lenny

2010-01-03 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 12:03:34PM +0100, Marc Schröder wrote: > i think your problem is mtu fragmentation. > > try on the squeeze the following as root: > > ifconfig eth0 mtu 1300 > > and try that wget again > marc yah... behing choking pppoe connection ... You can add iface eth0 inet dhcp

Re: Masquerading problems: squeeze via lenny

2010-01-03 Thread Marc Schröder
i think your problem is mtu fragmentation. try on the squeeze the following as root: ifconfig eth0 mtu 1300 and try that wget again marc Am Sonntag 03 Januar 2010 09:30:18 schrieb Andrei Popescu: > Hi everybody, > > I'm banging my head against the wall with this one and could appreciate >

Re: Masquerading problems: squeeze via lenny

2010-01-03 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Sun,03.Jan.10, 03:22:29, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Andrei Popescu put forth on 1/3/2010 2:30 AM: > > > I have no idea what to try so any hints are welcome. > > Try looking at your logs. This is exactly why logs exist, for > troubleshooting. > Start with the Lenny host's log files such as syslo

Re: Masquerading problems: squeeze via lenny

2010-01-03 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Sun,03.Jan.10, 18:10:48, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 10:30:18AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > The problem is that some websites work flawlessly from the squeeze box > > and some stall. The same sites are ok from the lenny box. Here are > > example sessions

Re: Masquerading problems: squeeze via lenny

2010-01-03 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 10:30:18AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: > Hi everybody, > The problem is that some websites work flawlessly from the squeeze box > and some stall. The same sites are ok from the lenny box. Here are > example sessions with wget: Have you tried runing lenny box inside your

Re: Masquerading problems: squeeze via lenny

2010-01-03 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Andrei Popescu put forth on 1/3/2010 2:30 AM: > I have no idea what to try so any hints are welcome. Try looking at your logs. This is exactly why logs exist, for troubleshooting. Start with the Lenny host's log files such as syslog and messages and any/all custom log files you or your firewall

Re: masquerading gone bad after new ip

2006-08-21 Thread Robert Van Horn
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 09:05:13PM +1000, Cameron Lowe wrote: > > > > > Can you access the outside world from your firewall/router? You may want > to check your routes. Hi, Thanks for the reply. iptables -L -v is my friend. I was just a little confused. :-( bob[EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: masquerading for internet access

2001-11-17 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 11:36:31AM +0100, Eric Smith wrote: > According to Michel Loos on Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 09:54:53PM -0200: > > > I thought this would just work out of the box :( > that did not work for me - but this entry in modules.conf did: > > ### update-modules: start processing /etc/mod

Re: masquerading for internet access

2001-11-17 Thread Michel Loos
On Sat, 2001-11-17 at 08:36, Eric Smith wrote: > According to Michel Loos on Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 09:54:53PM -0200: > > > I thought this would just work out of the box :( > > > > It works out of the box if eth0 is external and eth1 is local. > > In your case you have to modify the 00Interfaces(?sp

Re: masquerading for internet access

2001-11-17 Thread Michel Loos
On Sat, 2001-11-17 at 08:36, Eric Smith wrote: > According to Michel Loos on Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 09:54:53PM -0200: > > > I thought this would just work out of the box :( > > > > It works out of the box if eth0 is external and eth1 is local. > > In your case you have to modify the 00Interfaces(?sp

Re: masquerading for internet access

2001-11-17 Thread Eric Smith
According to Michel Loos on Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 09:54:53PM -0200: > > I thought this would just work out of the box :( > > It works out of the box if eth0 is external and eth1 is local. > In your case you have to modify the 00Interfaces(?sp I use iptables now) > file in order to switch external a

Re: masquerading for internet access - swopping eth0 and eth1

2001-11-16 Thread Eric Smith
According to Michel Loos on Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 09:54:53PM -0200: > On Fri, 2001-11-16 at 21:41, Eric Smith wrote: > > > > I am on unstable and trying to give a client machine internet access. > > > > eth1 on the server gets internet access via cable modem via dhcpcd and the > > eth0 to the loca

Re: masquerading for internet access

2001-11-16 Thread Michel Loos
On Fri, 2001-11-16 at 21:41, Eric Smith wrote: > > I am on unstable and trying to give a client machine internet access. > > eth1 on the server gets internet access via cable modem via dhcpcd and the > eth0 to the local LAN. The client and server communicate fine but > the client does not get in

[jason@whizzird.net: Re: masquerading]

2001-08-21 Thread Jason Majors
Linux is Great at that! I'm writing this on a box behind a Linux Gateway/Firewall to my cable modem. There's an ip_masq_quake module, that supports most network gaming (Half-Life is Quake based so you're good). I don't know about paltalk, but I'm able to use dialpad from behind here with a few port

RE: Masquerading -- Am I missing something?

2000-11-09 Thread Michael Patterson
> Michael Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > MP> Ok, I recently got a Maxtor 80Gb HD, so I figured I'd start > with a fresh > MP> install of Potato on my system. My problem is that I can't > seem to get a > MP> kernel that gives me both IP Masquerading and support for the drive. > MP> > MP> N

Re: Masquerading -- Am I missing something?

2000-11-09 Thread David Z. Maze
Michael Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MP> Ok, I recently got a Maxtor 80Gb HD, so I figured I'd start with a fresh MP> install of Potato on my system. My problem is that I can't seem to get a MP> kernel that gives me both IP Masquerading and support for the drive. MP> MP> Now, on the kerne

RE: Masquerading

2000-10-01 Thread Jeremy L. Gaddis
Assuming you're using a stock kernel or kernel with support for IP masquerading, these three lines should get you started with masq: /bin/echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward /sbin/ipchains -P forward REJECT /sbin/ipchains -I forward -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d ! 192.168.1.0/24 -j MASQ You may need to

Re: Masquerading and DNS

2000-05-27 Thread AntonioB
Just make sure your windows95 box has its DNS enabled, (you can put the same servers there as you have for your linux box) and make sure your gateway isn't blocking hmm port 53 I think. Ipmasq doesn't need anything special. Joshua (new linux convert as of 5-25-00!) On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, Brad Reid

Re: masquerading & ftp

2000-02-22 Thread Brian May
> "Nathan" == Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Nathan> You need to use passive ftp from behind a masquerading Nathan> box. Nathan> I thought there was a masq module for FTP, but I guess I Nathan> was thinking of the Cisco PIX. You have to examine each Nathan> p

Re: masquerading & ftp

2000-02-16 Thread Onno
gineer >GPG Key ID 1024D/51F98BB7 "Eschew Obfuscation" >Key fingerprint = C5F4 A147 416C E0BF AB73 8BEF F0C8 255C 51F9 8BB7 > >Attachment Converted: "c:\home\onno\email\attach\Re masquerading & ftp" >

Re: masquerading & ftp

2000-02-15 Thread aphro
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Brian McGroarty wrote: BMCGRO >With Debian, FTP doesn't work from behind a standard masquerading firewall. BMCGRO >I've observed the problem with ipfw and ipchains both. make sure you have all the ipmasq modules loaded, you need them for ftp, quake etc.. nate -

Re: masquerading & ftp

2000-02-15 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 03:06:00PM -0600, Brian McGroarty wrote: : As a learning exercise, I'm replacing our FreeBSD firewall with a Debian one. : The machine is used to provide masquerading for several Windows, Linux and : FreeBSD boxes on our cable modem. : : With Debian, FTP doesn't work from b

Re: masquerading

1999-12-11 Thread Igor Skypala
everything is OK, mistake was in routing table (wrong IP number) Thanks for help... igi > uninstaled ipmasq (with dselect) and masquerade _is_working_, > but only between linux box and internal network, when pinging > external host from internal net its unreachable :-( > _/_/_/_/_/ mailto: [E

Re: masquerading

1999-12-10 Thread Igor Skypala
NEWS FROM ME: uninstaled ipmasq (with dselect) and masquerade _is_working_, but only between linux box and internal network, when pinging external host from internal net its unreachable :-( > I need masqerade my internal eth network ( another one comp with W95) and > made everything what I > f

Re: masquerading

1999-12-10 Thread aphro
sounds like you dont have ip forwarding enabled, and make sure the gateway on the w95 box points to the ip of the linux box nate On Fri, 10 Dec 1999, igi technik wrote: tech >I'm newbie in Linux world so don't bite me... tech >I need masqerade my internal eth network ( another one comp with W95)

Re: masquerading

1999-12-10 Thread Marcin Kurc
adjust it to your needs: #! /bin/sh ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1 route add -net 127.0.0.0 IPADDR=192.168.1.1 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 NETWORK=192.168.1.0 BROADCAST=192.168.1.255 ifconfig eth0 ${IPADDR} netmask ${NETMASK} broadcast ${BROADCAST} route add -net ${NETWORK} ipfwadm -F -p deny ipfwadm -F -a m -S