On Sat, Feb 21, 1998 at 11:46:17AM +0900, Sen Nagata wrote:
>
> p.s. has anyone had any luck unounting mounted linux partitions
> using fsdext2? i tried what was in the included faq (/u option)
> but to no avail (option is not recognized). perhaps this option
> is not in version 0.16?
I've bee
at some point around Fri, 20 Feb 1998 09:18:54 +0100 (CET)
Fredrik Ax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> Peter van Sebille has written ext2 drivers for Win95. The driver
> is called FSDEXT2 and is at the present available in the incoming
> folders of sunsites e.g.
> ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/
On Wed, 18 Feb 1998, Sen Nagata wrote:
[SNIP]
> does anyone know whether there is something that can be used under w95
> or dos that will allow access to linux partitions?
Peter van Sebille has written ext2 drivers for Win95. The driver
is called FSDEXT2 and is at the present available in the in
-
> From: Sen Nagata[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 1998 9:58 PM
> To: David Wright
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Linux on top of win95
>
> at some point around Wed, 18 Feb 1998 16:40:53 + (GMT)
> David W
>I believe that you really should have a swap partion
This is not true. To begin with, you don't need swap space if you have
enough memory. For linux, swap is just an extra bunch of (slow) memory
that can be used if need be. If it is not there, and enough RAM is
available, that is not a
at some point around Wed, 18 Feb 1998 16:40:53 + (GMT)
David Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> I don't see where UMSDOS comes into this.
i was giving a reference for an alternative way to get linux running
alongside w95 -- using loadlin. i should probably have worded my message
better
Michael Barker
Technician
ATL Systems
> -Original Message-
> From: C.J.LAWSON [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 1998 1:29 AM
> To: Mike Barker
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: RE: Linux on top of win95
>
>
>
On Wed, Feb 18, 1998 at 04:39:26PM +, C.J.LAWSON wrote:
> At the risk of apearing to be knit-picking, I ask
> (1) How much mempry do you consider as a lot ... from what I can remember
> 16Mb was sufficient to do away with the swap file (probably except if
> you are runnig X ..)
Is any amount o
A simpler way may be to use linload95 - it's a package I downloaded that
allows you to boot Win95, then click an icon and load Linux. I used Alta
Vista to search for Linux Load Win95 and found it on sunsite.unc.edu...
Works well! (And leaves your PC config alone...)
> --
> From: [E
On Wed, 18 Feb 1998, Sen Nagata wrote:
> at some point around Tue, 17 Feb 98 20:07:11 -0600
> Asher Haig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
>
> > If you set up LILO when you install it, and then tell LILO how to find
> > the Windows partition, you can easily do a dual boot. Superior to doing
>
At the risk of apearing to be knit-picking, I ask
(1) How much mempry do you consider as a lot ... from what I can remember
16Mb was sufficient to do away with the swap file (probably except if
you are runnig X ..)
(2) would a seperate drive be faster than a swap file on the same disk?
... This ha
C.J.LAWSON wrote:
>
> On Wed, 18 Feb 1998, Mike Barker wrote:
>
> > would suggest using a sperate partion or drive for Linux, you'll need
> > one for swap anyway. I have win95, 2 versions of NT (workstaion 4 and
> Is that absolutely neccessary ... one for swap??
A separate drive certainly isn't
On Wed, 18 Feb 1998, Mike Barker wrote:
> would suggest using a sperate partion or drive for Linux, you'll need
> one for swap anyway. I have win95, 2 versions of NT (workstaion 4 and
Is that absolutely neccessary ... one for swap??
J.
> Michael Barker
> Technician
> ATL Systems
>
> > -
at some point around Tue, 17 Feb 98 20:07:11 -0600
Asher Haig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> If you set up LILO when you install it, and then tell LILO how to find
> the Windows partition, you can easily do a dual boot. Superior to doing
If you have NT, you can use a utility such as "bootpart" to add a line
to the boot.ini which lets you boot to linux from the NT boot loader. I
would suggest using a sperate partion or drive for Linux, you'll need
one for swap anyway. I have win95, 2 versions of NT (workstaion 4 and
server 5), and
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2/17/98 7:47 PM
>I know Linux can be installed ontop of a dos partition. Can it be
>installed on top of Win 95 or NT. I need to know this because although I
>run linux at home my office is NT and 95. I would like to be able to boot
>to linux in the office
16 matches
Mail list logo
