On Lu, 12 aug 19, 08:49:34, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> The other tip about kernel install selection is to install something
> like kernel-i386 or kernel-x86 without all of the long version numbers
> as suffixes in their names.
This is a good idea in general. For the amd64 architecture the package
nam
the choices. I expect one way or the other you have this
covered correctly, so it could be something between you and debian pool
is misconfigured.
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019, john wrote:
> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 08:23:59
> From: john
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Ke
@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Kernel upgrade ?
Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 11:13:13 + (UTC)
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
No I did not; I checked that again kjust niw but sill no upgrade.
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019, Holger Skidzun wrote:
> Did you by chance forgot apt-get update?
>
&g
You have updated /etc/apt-get/sources.list and replaced testing with
buster in all locations too and this failure continues?
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019, john wrote:
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 07:12:39
From: john
To: Holger Skidzun
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Kernel upgrade ?
Resent
No I did not; I checked that again kjust niw but sill no upgrade.
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019, Holger Skidzun wrote:
Did you by chance forgot apt-get update?
Cheers, Holger
Mit freundlichem Gruß!
Le 12 août 2019 à 12:35, John a écrit :
I received a notification from the Debian security list sayin
Did you by chance forgot apt-get update?
Cheers, Holger
Mit freundlichem Gruß!
> Le 12 août 2019 à 12:35, John a écrit :
>
> I received a notification from the Debian security list saying that
> there were a number of fixes to the kernel and saying I should update
> my buster system; "For the
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:35:34AM +0100, John wrote:
> I received a notification from the Debian security list saying that
> there were a number of fixes to the kernel and saying I should update
> my buster system; "For the stable distribution (buster), these
> problems have been fixed in version
On Thu, 05 Jul 2018 20:02:15 +0200
Guillaume Clercin wrote:
Hello Guillaume,
>I upgrade nvidia-driver to version 390.67-2 and I can boot without
>option "slab_common.usercopy_fallback".
Thanks for all your input on this, Guillaume. If you hadn't pointed out
the workaround, I'd have been well a
Le jeudi 5 juillet 2018, 08:25:15 CEST Ric Moore a écrit :
> On 07/04/2018 09:12 PM, Carl Fink wrote:
> > On 07/02/2018 04:49 AM, Guillaume Clercin wrote:
> >> You need to update "/etc/default/grub" and add parameter to boot with.
> >> In this
> >> file, you need to edit the line starting with GRUB
On 07/04/2018 09:12 PM, Carl Fink wrote:
On 07/02/2018 04:49 AM, Guillaume Clercin wrote:
You need to update "/etc/default/grub" and add parameter to boot with.
In this
file, you need to edit the line starting with GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX and
append
option: "slab_common.usercopy_fallback=y". This wo
On 07/02/2018 04:49 AM, Guillaume Clercin wrote:
You need to update "/etc/default/grub" and add parameter to boot with. In this
file, you need to edit the line starting with GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX and append
option: "slab_common.usercopy_fallback=y". This workaround was suggested by
nvidia maintainer
On Sun, 1 Jul 2018 19:06:10 -0400
Carl Fink wrote:
Hello Carl,
>Thoughts?
Apply the fix reported by Guillaume. I can confirm it works.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediately apparent"
No, he's just a w*
You Married A Tort
Le lundi 2 juillet 2018, 01:06:10 CEST Carl Fink a écrit :
> So, on a Testing system, linux-image-4.16.0-2-amd64 came up in the apt
>
> queue. I installed it and rebooted.
> My system froze on reboot. Scrolled through the boot messages on the
> console, up to X starting, then this (warning, long e
On Sun, 1 Jul 2018 19:06:10 -0400
Carl Fink wrote:
Hello Carl,
>Multiple reboots give the same behavior, never
>giving me either a console or X prompt.
Same here. Discovered by my wife when she turned the computer on this
morning. I haven't removed .0.2, simply manually selected the .0.1
kern
On Mi, 13 aug 14, 17:13:24, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> * From: Andrei POPESCU
> * Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 08:32:32 +0300
> > ... complete output from running apt-get ...
>
> root@armada:/home/peter# apt-get install linux-image-2.6-686-pae
...
> root@armada:/home/peter# apt-get install lin
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 11:38:54AM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 18:51:59 -0400
> Stephen Allen wrote:
>
> Hello Stephen,
>
> >better although slower. At one time it was the go to, but since I've
> >gathered that apt-get has been improved.
>
> Also, IIRC, mixing aptitude, apt-
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 18:51:59 -0400
Stephen Allen wrote:
Hello Stephen,
>better although slower. At one time it was the go to, but since I've
>gathered that apt-get has been improved.
Also, IIRC, mixing aptitude, apt-get & Synaptic for upgrades and
package installation, was considered a bad idea
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 09:37:28PM +0200, Nemeth Gyorgy wrote:
> 2014-03-31 20:07 keltezéssel, Brad Rogers írta:
> > For my set of circumstances, it is. However, I neglected to take proper
> > note of yours. You're using apt-get (etc.) and I tend to use Synaptic.
> > Clearly, behaviour is differe
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 07:46:15PM +0200, Nemeth Gyorgy wrote:
> 2014-03-30 14:59 keltezéssel, Stephen Allen írta:
>
> >> Are you sure?
> >> When the kernel version number changes, the
> >> linux-image--amd64.deb will be a new package.
> >>
> >> Plain apt-get upgrade upgrades the installed package
2014-03-31 20:07 keltezéssel, Brad Rogers írta:
> For my set of circumstances, it is. However, I neglected to take proper
> note of yours. You're using apt-get (etc.) and I tend to use Synaptic.
> Clearly, behaviour is different in each case.
>
> Mea Culpa.
>
> With the meta-package installed o
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 19:46:15 +0200
Nemeth Gyorgy wrote:
Hello Nemeth,
>... was not correct... :)
For my set of circumstances, it is. However, I neglected to take proper
note of yours. You're using apt-get (etc.) and I tend to use Synaptic.
Clearly, behaviour is different in each case.
Mea Cu
2014-03-30 14:59 keltezéssel, Stephen Allen írta:
>> Are you sure?
>> When the kernel version number changes, the
>> linux-image--amd64.deb will be a new package.
>>
>> Plain apt-get upgrade upgrades the installed packages only and does not
>> install new package. But in this case the linux-image-
On Du, 30 mar 14, 10:57:37, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2014 10:42:52 +0200
> Nemeth Gyorgy wrote:
>
> Hello Nemeth,
>
> >Are you sure?
> >When the kernel version number changes, the
> >linux-image--amd64.deb will be a new package.
>
> Yes. Stephen said "..assuming of course the meta p
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:42:52AM +0200, Nemeth Gyorgy wrote:
> 2014-03-29 22:29 keltezéssel, Stephen Allen írta:
> >> Do you have linux-image-amd64 installed? If not, install it. It always
> >> depends on the latest kernel so if there is a newer kernel, it will be
> >> installed automatically (if
On Sun, 30 Mar 2014 10:42:52 +0200
Nemeth Gyorgy wrote:
Hello Nemeth,
>Are you sure?
>When the kernel version number changes, the
>linux-image--amd64.deb will be a new package.
Yes. Stephen said "..assuming of course the meta package is
installed." He didn't write that without reason.
--
R
2014-03-29 22:29 keltezéssel, Stephen Allen írta:
>> Do you have linux-image-amd64 installed? If not, install it. It always
>> depends on the latest kernel so if there is a newer kernel, it will be
>> installed automatically (if you do dist-upgrade).
>>
>
> Actually a 'dist-upgrade' isn't necessar
On Sun, 2014-03-30 at 16:35 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > >Do I have to upgrade to 3.13-1-amd64?
>
> Absolutely not! If your machine is working perfectly, why risk it?
Good point :D!
OT: We sometimes take a look to our crystal balls and we are unhappy,
when e.g. the RT patched kernels > 3.8
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 02:05:57PM +, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 14:31:03 +0100
> François Patte wrote:
>
> Hello François,
>
> >Since I installed debian sid (august 2013), I regularly made upgrade,
> >but the kernel doesn't appear to be upgraded. Why? I am running
>
> Unless
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 04:50:50PM +0100, Nemeth Gyorgy wrote:
> 2014-03-29 14:31 keltezéssel, François Patte írta:
>
> > Since I installed debian sid (august 2013), I regularly made upgrade,
> > but the kernel doesn't appear to be upgraded. Why? I am running
> > 3.2.0-4-amd64 kernel.
> >
> > Do
2014-03-29 14:31 keltezéssel, François Patte írta:
> Since I installed debian sid (august 2013), I regularly made upgrade,
> but the kernel doesn't appear to be upgraded. Why? I am running
> 3.2.0-4-amd64 kernel.
>
> Do I have to upgrade to 3.13-1-amd64? If yes how to proceed?
>
Do you have lin
On Sat, 2014-03-29 at 14:05 +, Brad Rogers wrote:
> Either install the latest kernel manually or, if you prefer to have
> kernels handled by your usual update routine, install
> linux-image-amd64, which depends on the latest kernel version.
IOW a meta package does handle upgrades. But as Brad
On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 14:31:03 +0100
François Patte wrote:
Hello François,
>Since I installed debian sid (august 2013), I regularly made upgrade,
>but the kernel doesn't appear to be upgraded. Why? I am running
Unless an additional package is installed, kernels are exempt from
upgrade.
>Do I hav
On Sat, 2014-03-29 at 14:31 +0100, François Patte wrote:
> Bonjour,
>
>
> Since I installed debian sid (august 2013), I regularly made upgrade,
> but the kernel doesn't appear to be upgraded. Why? I am running
> 3.2.0-4-amd64 kernel.
>
> Do I have to upgrade to 3.13-1-amd64? If yes how to procee
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 22:48:42 -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 08:03:25PM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
> > I've got one machine running Debian Sid that has not be upgraded in a
> > month or so. It's running a custom kernel I built who-knows-when
> > (2.6.6). Frankly, I can't
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 08:03:25PM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
> I've got one machine running Debian Sid that has not be upgraded in a
> month or so. It's running a custom kernel I built who-knows-when
> (2.6.6). Frankly, I can't remember the reason for the custom kernel.
So am I wedged?
$ sudo
On 4/26/07, Andrew J. Barr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David Claughton wrote:
> Ah, makes sense. I've never used LILO, only Grub.
yaboot (bootloader for powerpc) also uses symlinks.
--
Regards
PK
--
http://counter.li.org #402424
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Claughton wrote:
> Ah, makes sense. I've never used LILO, only Grub.
You didn't miss anything, trust me.
- --
Andrew J. Barr
Thunderbird/1.5.0.10 (compatible; Icedove 1.5; X11; en-US; Linux
2.6.21-rc7 ppc) (Debian/1.5.0.10dfsg.1)
"Why must I
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
its a lilo thing.
A
Ah, makes sense. I've never used LILO, only Grub.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 12:39:03PM +, David Claughton wrote:
> Douglas Allan Tutty porchlight.ca> writes:
>
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 05:47:33PM -0400, ISHWAR RATTAN wrote:
> > >
> > > Is there a way to safely update the running kernel 2.4
> > > to 2.6? What to do if the new kernel do
Douglas Allan Tutty porchlight.ca> writes:
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 05:47:33PM -0400, ISHWAR RATTAN wrote:
> >
> > Is there a way to safely update the running kernel 2.4
> > to 2.6? What to do if the new kernel does not boot?
> >
>
> Yes.
> Before you start, only have one kernel (the work
On 04/25/2007 07:59 PM, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 05:47:33PM -0400, ISHWAR RATTAN wrote:
>> Is there a way to safely update the running kernel 2.4
>> to 2.6? What to do if the new kernel does not boot?
>>
>
> Yes.
> Before you start, only have one kernel (the working 2.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 05:47:33PM -0400, ISHWAR RATTAN wrote:
>
> Is there a way to safely update the running kernel 2.4
> to 2.6? What to do if the new kernel does not boot?
>
Yes.
Before you start, only have one kernel (the working 2.4) installed.
There should be a symlink from /vmlinuz and
ISHWAR RATTAN wrote:
>
> Is there a way to safely update the running kernel 2.4
> to 2.6? What to do if the new kernel does not boot?
You keep the old kernel around so you can boot from it if things go wrong.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
On 1/10/07, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 07:50:17AM -0600, German Velazquez wrote:
> Buen dia, alguien podria orientarme sobre la forma mas segura y sencilla de
> actualizar el kernel en debian.
>
> tengo el 2.4...quisiera actualizar al 2.6.6...
¿
Michael Bonert wrote:
>
> My question-- before trying another kernel upgrade or considering taking a
> stab at 2.6.14:
> 1. Is the package 'libc6-i686' essential for replacing the functionality of
> the 'hotplug' package?
They are totally different packages, so no.
The 'hotplug' package is obs
well thanks. That makes things clear.
Btw, I had to re-install my system around end of march
2006. And yes it was installed with grub. So, I guess
that takes care of the rerun issue?
There is a "savedefault" option that can be added to
the grub config file (/boot/grub/menu.lst) after
describing
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 09:36:44PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 06:32:42PM -0700, Christopher Nelson wrote:
> > On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 03:47:28PM -0700, kruton wrote:
> > > Debian Unstable, running 2.6.16-1-486 on i386
> > > platform.
> > >
> > > These days I get the
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 06:32:42PM -0700, Christopher Nelson wrote:
> On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 03:47:28PM -0700, kruton wrote:
> > Debian Unstable, running 2.6.16-1-486 on i386
> > platform.
> >
> > These days I get the following message from Debian
> > Configuration when I 'apt-get upgrade'.. Any
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 03:47:28PM -0700, kruton wrote:
> Debian Unstable, running 2.6.16-1-486 on i386
> platform.
>
> These days I get the following message from Debian
> Configuration when I 'apt-get upgrade'.. Any idea why
> its trying to install the same kernel image...
It's updating the
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 17:09 -0400, Tom Moore wrote:
> Does anyone know what is needed to upgrade this server from a 2.4 kernel to
> 2.6?
> Currently I have Sarge installed on a couple of these machines and I'm
> wanting to upgrade them to use 2.6 kernels.
> I tried installing the kernel-image-2.6-6
Tom Moore wrote:
Does anyone know what is needed to upgrade this server from a 2.4 kernel to
2.6?
Currently I have Sarge installed on a couple of these machines and I'm
wanting to upgrade them to use 2.6 kernels.
I tried installing the kernel-image-2.6-686 package and when I rebooted the
machine
I have resolved this issue.
The problem is discussed on the Linux Kernel mailing list. It is a problem
with conflicts with USB subsystem.
I am using the Gigabyte GA-7DPXDWP dual AMD motherboard with dual athlon MP
2400+ processors.
If you turn off USB keyboard and USB mouse support in the Mthe
Søren Boll Overgaard wrote on Dec, 14:
[...]
> I've recently upgraded the linux-image-2.6-686 package to 2.6.14-5[1]. The
> installation went as normal when new kernel images are installed, but the
> ensuing reboot didn't work out as expected.
>
> Immediately after the first IDE disk was detecte
Søren Boll Overgaard wrote:
Hi,
I've recently upgraded the linux-image-2.6-686 package to 2.6.14-5[1]. The
installation went as normal when new kernel images are installed, but the
ensuing reboot didn't work out as expected.
Immediately after the first IDE disk was detected, output like this w
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 05:35:49PM -0500, David Zelinsky wrote:
> I'm trying to upgrade the kernel from 2.4 to 2.6 on my Thinkpad. I'm
> using custom built kernel rather than the stock debian kernel, since
> the stock kernel doesn't have some features that I want.
>
> My question is how to deal w
David Zelinsky wrote:
boot into the old 2.4 kernel and have everything work as before. Is
there a way to have entries in these files be conditional on the
kernel version?
It looks like you can. /etc/modules.conf is automatically generated, so
don't edit it directly. Instead, you manipulate
On Friday 11 November 2005 05:54, Matt Price wrote:
> recently compiled a new kernel (2.6.14, with suspend2 patches applied)
> & found that
> a) on boot the screen stayed blank until gdm started up, and
> b) once the system was up pressing ctrl-alt-f1 gave a wierd mash of
> colors, so that the cons
On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 01:55:31PM -0700, Herman Swartz wrote:
> Roberto,
>
> The CPU is a Pentium P5 (120Mhz).
>
> The previous kernel had a -586 on the end of the
> package.
>
> I don't see any kernel upgrades to 2.6.8 with a -586
> at the end.
>
If there is no -586 kernel, you will need to
t.
Herman
--- "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 16:44:55 -0400
> From: "Roberto C. Sanchez"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: kernel upgrade from 2.4 to 2.6.8-2-686
>
>
On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 01:39:58PM -0700, Herman Swartz wrote:
> After upgrade at boot time "Linux loading ."
> appears then system reboots. This happens over and
> over again.
>
> The 2.4 kernel was already set up to use initrd.
>
> Any idea what happened in the upgrade and how to fix
> it?
Tony Godshall wrote:
>>>I'm running kernel 2.4.18-bf2.4 on my computers. Filesystem is RaiserFS
>>>3.6.25. What I need to do for upgrading kernel to 2.6.x
>
>
>
>>If you are going to build the kernel from source, don't forget to
>>also build Reiserfs into the kernel.
>
> ...
>
> Or not. init
> > I'm running kernel 2.4.18-bf2.4 on my computers. Filesystem is RaiserFS
> > 3.6.25. What I need to do for upgrading kernel to 2.6.x
> If you are going to build the kernel from source, don't forget to
> also build Reiserfs into the kernel.
...
Or not. initrd.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Juhani Pöyry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running kernel 2.4.18-bf2.4 on my computers. Filesystem is RaiserFS
> 3.6.25. What I need to do for upgrading kernel to 2.6.x
>
> Juhani Pöyry
>
>
If you are going to build the kernel from source, don't forget to
also build Reiserfs into the kernel.
If you wi
Hello
Bernie Berg (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> Johnno wrote:
>>Bernie Berg (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
>>> Johnno wrote:
VFS: Cannot open root device "301" or 03:01
Please append a correct "root=" boot option
Kernel Panic: VFS unable to mount root fs on 03:01
>>> Are you us
Cool Bananas It works...
Many thanks for that, you don't want to know how many hours I have spend
trying to get to work :)))
Johnno
- Original Message -
From: "Andreas Janssen"
> Hello
>
> Johnno (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
>
> > I was trying to update the kernel from 2.2.0 to 2.4.18-
I have in lilo.conf
image=/vmlinuz
label=LinuxNew
root=/dev/hda1
read-only
optional
- Original Message -
From: "Bernie Berg"
> Well, this must not be your problem becuase I am sure ext2 is in that
> kernel. Is the root option setup cottectly in your boot loader (for
> lilo it is in
Hello
Johnno (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I was trying to update the kernel from 2.2.0 to 2.4.18-1-386
>
> I used apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.18-1-386
>
> I have tried to install it a few times but still get the some errors
> when I reboot
>
> VFS: Cannot open root device "301" or 03:01
- Original Message -
VFS: Cannot open root device "301" or 03:01
Please append a correct "root=" boot option
Kernel Panic: VFS unable to mount root fs on 03:01
Are you using ext3 or reiserfs (or maybe some other fs that isn't
compiled by default)? If so you should compile your filesystem
Can anyone help me with this? I need to remove this error message... Is
it just a matter of re-booting?
Simon Buchanan wrote:
Hi there, i have just apt-get upgraded my kernel. I am running woody on
a dual AMD athlon box and using 2.4.26-1-k7-smp via a backport... I have
two questions/issues if
Can anyone help me with this please? Is it just a matter of re-booting
the box? Much appreciated.
Simon Buchanan wrote:
Hi there, i have just apt-get upgraded my kernel. I am running woody on
a dual AMD athlon box and using 2.4.26-1-k7-smp via a backport... I have
two questions/issues if someon
On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 10:52:54 +1300, Simon Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there, i have just apt-get upgraded my kernel. I am running woody on
> a dual AMD athlon box and using 2.4.26-1-k7-smp via a backport... I have
> two questions/issues if someone could shed some light for me please:
>
In case you are still interested in this topic, I have just spent some
hours on it and found the followings:
When installing either the stock 2.6.6 kernel-image or tailor compiled
2.6.6 kernel-image, these error messages appeared but seems to be
harmless (pls correct me if not):
cpio: /etc/mod
Hi Justin,
Thanks for your help, I got it working now, but it is weird. This is what I
read at http://www.wlug.org.nz/SoftwareRaid:
"The most recent versions (eg LinuxKernel2.6) of the Debian kernel-image
packages build a new initrd image upon installation. They should
automatically notice if the
Hi Justin,
Thanks for your help, I got it working now, but it is weird. This is what I
read at http://www.wlug.org.nz/SoftwareRaid:
"The most recent versions (eg LinuxKernel2.6) of the Debian kernel-image
packages build a new initrd image upon installation. They should
automatically notice if the
On Monday 31 May 2004 12:00, Bob wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm attempting to upgrade from 2.6.2 to kernel 2.6.6, compiling from the
> kernel-source package,
> make-kpkg --initrd kernel_image modules_image
> and trying to install with dpkg -i
>
> This used to work fine, but now I get
>
> Setting up kernel-im
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 09:37:26PM -0400, Kevin Coyner wrote..
>
> I'm currently running unstable on a 2.4.20 kernel and just tried to
> upgrade to the 2.6 kernel by running:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-get install kernel-image-2.6.5-1-686
>
> and I get the following error:
>
> Do you w
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 03:57:35AM +0200, Aurel wrote..
> Hi all,
>
> I have a problem mounting the memory stick of my Sony CLie SJ 33.
> It worked with all my 2.2.x and 2.4.x kernels but since I upgraded a
> week ago to 2.6.4 I can't mount it anymore however I can sync using
> pilot-link
Hi all,
I have a problem mounting the memory stick of my Sony CLie SJ 33.
It worked with all my 2.2.x and 2.4.x kernels but since I upgraded a
week ago to 2.6.4 I can't mount it anymore however I can sync using
pilot-link/jpilot.
Here's what I got:
LinuxBox:/home/cesar# mount /dev/sda1 /mnt/ms
> On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 23:19:18 +, wattoo wrote:
>
>> I used lvmcreate_initrd to build an initrd with LVM support.
>
> I never got this to work. I just compiled my own kernel with
> built-in LVM (not a module).
>
> And RAID too.
>
>
> --
> Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 23:19:18 +, wattoo wrote:
> I used lvmcreate_initrd to build an initrd with LVM support.
I never got this to work. I just compiled my own kernel with
built-in LVM (not a module).
And RAID too.
--
Leandro GuimarÃes Faria Corsetti Dutra +55 (11
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 15 February 2004 02:19 pm, wattoo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am running a Debian unstable with kernel 2.4.18 and LVM support.
>
> # df -h
> FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/vgos/root248M 150M 86M 64% /
> /d
On Tue, 06 Jan 2004, Jonathan Melhuish wrote:
> I have a fully-working Debian install on my laptop 8-) but every time I
> (or rather, the beautiful apt-get) upgrades the kernel, pcmcia card
> services break. Thus breaking the PC card network interface, thus
> breaking my connection to the Inte
James F. Green wrote:
I installed woody from a downloaded CD image (I only downloaded the first
CD, not the whole set) but alas no support for my network card. After
searching Usenet I found that 2.4.21 or higher has support for my hardware.
So I seem to need to upgrade my kernel in order to get m
On 2004-01-13, Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete Dutra penned:
> Em Ter, 2004-01-13 às 11:46, James F. Green escreveu:
>> 2.4.18 is the latest kernel-source package available in the stable
>> distribution. The testing distribution has kernel-source-2.4.19-23
>> plus a couple of versions of 2.6.0. M
Em Ter, 2004-01-13 Ãs 11:46, James F. Green escreveu:
> 2.4.18 is the latest kernel-source package available in the stable
> distribution. The testing distribution has kernel-source-2.4.19-23 plus a
> couple of versions of 2.6.0. My question -- which CDs contain the packages
> I need?
No
Problem fixed! Thank you Alan.
I upgraded the FR114P firmware to the latest beta release (I had orignaly upgraded to
the latest stable release) and every thing seems to be
working fine.
Thanks,
George
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 22:21:29 +
Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 04 J
On Sunday 04 January 2004 20:22, George App wrote:
> Netgear FR114P router/firewall which is connected by DSL.
This unit has the ability to block outgoing connections (at least if its
anything like my RP614). I also discovered that my router locks solid if the
traffic on the wan side gets to mu
Netgear FR114P router/firewall which is connected by DSL.
/etc/resolv.conf (file contents)
search
nameserver 64.160.192.70
nameserver 206.13.29.12
-- George
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 19:49:10 +
Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 04 January 2004 18:42, George App wrote:
> > I hav
On Sunday 04 January 2004 18:42, George App wrote:
> I have no proxy server.
>
> I have no server to test the telnet connection to. I use mozilla for http
> access. apt-get is not even able to access http or ftp sites.
>
> Everything works fine using the 2.4.18 kernel.
>
What does you machine co
I have no proxy server.
I have no server to test the telnet connection to. I use mozilla for http access.
apt-get is not even able to access http or ftp sites.
Everything works fine using the 2.4.18 kernel.
Thanks for your help.
-- George
On Sat, 3 Jan 2004 11:53:23 +0100
GCS <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 02:31:30PM -0800, George App <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I successfully upgraded my kernel from version 2.4.18 to 2.4.23. I basically used
> the kernel settings based upon my 2.4.18-xfs configuration.
Did you touch any netfilter options?
> Everything works ok except to
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 15:15, David Palmer. wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 05:10:31 -0800
> Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 06:41:30AM -0600, Hoyt Bailey wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 03:15:06PM -0800, Tom wrote:
> > >
> > > Fact: Closer to 5 pints than 5
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 05:10:31 -0800
Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 06:41:30AM -0600, Hoyt Bailey wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 03:15:06PM -0800, Tom wrote:
> >
> > Fact: Closer to 5 pints than 5 gallons.
> >
> > > > gallons of blood. A swimming pool holds abo
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 09:49:05AM -0800, Tom wrote:
[stuff]
Sorry, list. I'm so used to hitting "L". I really meant to take that
Off-List.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 09:58:39AM -0600, Hoyt Bailey wrote:
> Your worldview is screwed up. Do some fact checking.
> Hoyt
What in particular? The five gallons, sure that was a mistake. I
corrected it in the same email you replied to. (To "about a gallon"
which is the way it was described i
- Original Message -
From: "Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "debian-user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 07:10
Subject: Re: Kernel upgrade time
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 06:41:30AM -0600, Hoyt Bailey wrote:
> >
> >
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 08:12:24AM -0600, Hoyt Bailey wrote:
> The actions of a typical 13 year old.
Well, old man, you ain't doing much better. At least I'm trying shit.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 01:09
Subject: Re: Kernel upgrade time
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 12:46:06PM +0800, David Palmer. wrote:
> >
> > I don't know what yo
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 04:29:04 -0800
Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 07:16:48PM +0800, David Palmer. wrote:
> > Tommy boy, you haven't got what it takes to screw with my head.
>
> Okay. Just out of curiousity, are you older or younger than 30: those
>
> of us older can rem
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 06:41:30AM -0600, Hoyt Bailey wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 03:15:06PM -0800, Tom wrote:
>
> Fact: Closer to 5 pints than 5 gallons.
>
> > > gallons of blood. A swimming pool holds about 25,000 gallons of fluid.
> >
> > Sorry, I forgot how my story goes: the human
1 - 100 of 269 matches
Mail list logo
