Ismael Valladolid Torres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
[...]
> The more customized your kernel to your system, the better. But often
> improvements don't compensate the amount of work it requires to end up
> with a kernel fully optimized to your system.
>
> I usually use Debian kernel's config
Bernard Adrian escribe:
> Should i understand my system would work better if i install the same
> kernel without initrd ?
The more customized your kernel to your system, the better. But often
improvements don't compensate the amount of work it requires to end up
with a kernel fully optimized to yo
I wrote:
> For a distribution kernel it provides support for all possible
> permutations and combinations of hardware. I don't know of any
> advantages for a custom kernel.
Manoj Srivastava writes:
> Well, I have a fully encrypted laptop hard drive, apart from a 42MB /boot
> (including encrypted
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 10:30:19 -0600, John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Amit Joshi writes:
>> What exactly are the advantages of using an initrd?
> For a distribution kernel it provides support for all possible
> permutations and combinations of hardware. I don't know of any
> advantages fo
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Initrd is an extra bit of complexity at bootup but it makes no difference
> once the system is up. Don't worry about it.
Ok. Thanks !
--
Bernard Adrian
http://www.bernadrian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
Bernard Adrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
[...]
> I'm compiling a custom kernel (2.6.1) with initrd for my system (AMD K6-II 64
Oups : i wanted to say kernel 2.6.17 and no 2.6.1
--
Bernard Adrian
http://www.bernadrian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
Bernard Adrian writes:
> Should i understand my system would work better if i install the same
> kernel without initrd ?
Initrd is an extra bit of complexity at bootup but it makes no difference
once the system is up. Don't worry about it.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> For a distribution kernel it provides support for all possible permutations
> and combinations of hardware. I don't know of any advantages for a custom
> kernel.
Huh,
I'm compiling a custom kernel (2.6.1) with initrd for my system (AMD K6-II 64
Mo RA
Amit Joshi wrote:
On Saturday 11 November 2006 22:00, John Hasler wrote:
Amit Joshi writes:
What exactly are the advantages of using an initrd?
For a distribution kernel it provides support for all possible permutations
and combinations of hardware. I don't know of any advantages for a custom
On Saturday 11 November 2006 22:00, John Hasler wrote:
> Amit Joshi writes:
> > What exactly are the advantages of using an initrd?
>
> For a distribution kernel it provides support for all possible permutations
> and combinations of hardware. I don't know of any advantages for a custom
> kernel.
Amit Joshi writes:
> What exactly are the advantages of using an initrd?
For a distribution kernel it provides support for all possible permutations
and combinations of hardware. I don't know of any advantages for a custom
kernel.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Saturday 11 November 2006 20:00, Wackojacko wrote:
> Marc Wilson wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 02:10:53PM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> >> make menuconfig
> >> make-kpkg --revision 1 kernel_image
> >
> > Don't you end up with an initrd that way? I admit to never wasting my
> > time with
Marc Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 02:10:53PM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
make menuconfig
make-kpkg --revision 1 kernel_image
Don't you end up with an initrd that way? I admit to never wasting my time
with kernel-package, but I thought you couldn't avoid one if you insisted
on using
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 02:10:53PM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> make menuconfig
> make-kpkg --revision 1 kernel_image
Don't you end up with an initrd that way? I admit to never wasting my time
with kernel-package, but I thought you couldn't avoid one if you insisted
on using it.
--
Marc Wil
I went to compile a vanilla kernel from kernel.org, and so read the
directions at the Debian site. They seem to me to be needlessly
complicated. Is there something in Debian which would prevent me from
compiling a kernel the good old fashioned way --
make menuconfig
make && make modules_instal
On Saturday 11 November 2006 00:56, Ed wrote:
> I went to compile a vanilla kernel from kernel.org, and so read the
> directions at the Debian site. They seem to me to be needlessly
> complicated. Is there something in Debian which would prevent me from
> compiling a kernel the good old fashioned
Ed wrote:
I went to compile a vanilla kernel from kernel.org, and so read the
directions at the Debian site. They seem to me to be needlessly
complicated. Is there something in Debian which would prevent me from
compiling a kernel the good old fashioned way --
make menuconfig
make && make m
17 matches
Mail list logo
