RE: Kernel 2.0.34 problems

1998-12-01 Thread Alex McCool
> -Original Message- > From: Nathan E Norman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I "grew up" with Slackware too; I find the ability to put the > kernel and > its associated modules in a deb file, but then I use one machine to > compile kernels for the various machines we have, since it's much > fa

Re: Kernel 2.0.34 problems

1998-12-01 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Mon, 30 Nov 1998, Steve Lamb wrote: : On Mon, Nov 30, 1998 at 12:43:32PM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote: : > : We'll find out shortly. I'm FTPing the sources from sunsite. Never did : > : like the Debian way of doing the Kernel. : : > Why not? : : Because I was a Slackware p

Re: Kernel 2.0.34 problems

1998-12-01 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Mon, Nov 30, 1998 at 03:40:49PM -0700, Gary L. Hennigan wrote: > The short of it is, learn to use make-kpkg. It'll make life a LOT > easier on your new Debian system. It's also a lot easier to compile kernels for other systems with it. I have some 486 systems for which I prefer to build on fast

Re: Kernel 2.0.34 problems

1998-12-01 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Mon, Nov 30, 1998 at 01:28:50PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote: > Because I was a Slackware person before I was a Debian person. I don't > like how the headers are split from the code. I've never cared to learn the > "Debian way" when "make dep ; make clean ; make zlilo ; shutdown -r now" > works

Re: Kernel 2.0.34 problems

1998-11-30 Thread Steve Lamb
On Mon, Nov 30, 1998 at 03:40:49PM -0700, Gary L. Hennigan wrote: > The "make zlilo" approach is problematic if you have something else > that depends on a specific kernel version (Read the file > /usr/doc/kernel-package/Rationale.gz for 11 or so reasons you want to > use make-kpkg). All of wh

Re: Kernel 2.0.34 problems

1998-11-30 Thread Gary L. Hennigan
Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Mon, Nov 30, 1998 at 12:43:32PM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote: | > : We'll find out shortly. I'm FTPing the sources from | > sunsite. Never did | > : like the Debian way of doing the Kernel. | | > Why not? | | Because I was a Slackware person b

Re: Kernel 2.0.34 problems

1998-11-30 Thread Steve Lamb
On Mon, Nov 30, 1998 at 12:43:32PM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote: > : We'll find out shortly. I'm FTPing the sources from sunsite. Never > did > : like the Debian way of doing the Kernel. > Why not? Because I was a Slackware person before I was a Debian person. I don't like how the h

Re: Kernel 2.0.34 problems

1998-11-30 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Sun, 29 Nov 1998, Steve Lamb wrote: : On Sun, Nov 29, 1998 at 10:22:24AM +0100, Egon Schmid wrote: : > Oh sorry, I have never tried to build a kernel the Debian way. So I have : > to symlink the header files according the README. Could it be that there : > is something wrong? : : We'

Re: Kernel 2.0.34 problems

1998-11-30 Thread Gary L. Hennigan
Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | [1 ] | On Mon, Nov 30, 1998 at 01:39:25PM +1100, Richard Lyon wrote: | > > We'll find out shortly. I'm FTPing the sources from sunsite. Never | > > did like the Debian way of doing the Kernel. | > > | | > GULP This seems a bit drastic, "make zlilo

Re: Kernel 2.0.34 problems

1998-11-30 Thread Steve Lamb
On Mon, Nov 30, 1998 at 01:39:25PM +1100, Richard Lyon wrote: > > We'll find out shortly. I'm FTPing the sources from sunsite. Never > > did like the Debian way of doing the Kernel. > > > GULP This seems a bit drastic, "make zlilo" works for me with 2.0.34. > It almost seems like you ha

Re: Kernel 2.0.34 problems

1998-11-30 Thread Richard Lyon
> We'll find out shortly. I'm FTPing the sources from sunsite. Never did > like the Debian way of doing the Kernel. > GULP This seems a bit drastic, "make zlilo" works for me with 2.0.34. It almost seems like you have not installed all the right development bits. Have you got a copy o

Re: Kernel 2.0.34 problems

1998-11-29 Thread Steve Lamb
On Sun, Nov 29, 1998 at 10:22:24AM +0100, Egon Schmid wrote: > Oh sorry, I have never tried to build a kernel the Debian way. So I have > to symlink the header files according the README. Could it be that there > is something wrong? We'll find out shortly. I'm FTPing the sources from sunsite.

Re: Kernel 2.0.34 problems

1998-11-29 Thread Egon Schmid
Oh sorry, I have never tried to build a kernel the Debian way. So I have to symlink the header files according the README. Could it be that there is something wrong? -Egon On Sun, 29 Nov 1998, Steve Lamb wrote: > On Sun, Nov 29, 1998 at 10:02:00AM +0100, Egon Schmid wrote: > > Install the kernel

Re: Kernel 2.0.34 problems

1998-11-29 Thread Steve Lamb
On Sun, Nov 29, 1998 at 10:02:00AM +0100, Egon Schmid wrote: > Install the kernel header files. I hate to say it, but I am not that stupid. Neither is dselect. *** Opt develkernel-heade 2.0.34-42.0.34-4Header files related *** Opt develkernel-sourc 2.0.34-42.0.34-4L

Re: Kernel 2.0.34 problems

1998-11-29 Thread Egon Schmid
Install the kernel header files. -Egon On Sun, 29 Nov 1998, Steve Lamb wrote: > Anyone else get this when doing a make zlilo with 2.0.34? > > ld -m elf_i386 -Ttext 0x1000 -e startup_32 -o vmlinux head.o misc.o piggy.o > make[2]: Leaving directory > /usr/src/kernel-source-2.0.34/arch/i386/b