On 20-Oct-99 Biciunas, Paul John wrote:
> > anyone know what the KDEDIR variable should be set to?
>
> My KDEDIR is set to /usr/local/kde (though this is on my Sun box at work).
>>From http://www.kde.org FAQ,
> "set the environment variable KDEDIR to the base of your KDE tree"
on my
> anyone know what the KDEDIR variable should be set to?
My KDEDIR is set to /usr/local/kde (though this is on my Sun box at work).
>From http://www.kde.org FAQ,
"set the environment variable KDEDIR to the base of your KDE tree"
-Paul
"We all agree your theory is crazy. The quest
Excellent stuff. Now all we need is a deb with --enable-kde,
--enable-gnome and --disable-redundantstuff (root menus etc). Is making
such a deb as simple as downloading source.deb, compiling with the
options and repacking?
(Oh yeah, would it compile from source on 2.0?) It won't on Suse 5.3
withou
On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, Navindra Umanee wrote:
[ snip ]
: > > Probably not. Debian is lame.
[ snip ]
: > But in potato there is:
: >
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/x11/wmaker-kde_0.51.0-3.deb
: >
: > I am not sure what else you'll need from unstable.
:
: I'm
Montreal Thu Feb 18 18:30:36 1999
Kirk Hogenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Navindra Umanee wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Does Debian 2.1 come with a Window Maker deb compiled with
> > > --enable-kde?
> >
> > Probably not. Debian is lame.
> >
>
> 2.1, No. That's because the WindowMaker version in
Navindra Umanee wrote:
>
>
> > Does Debian 2.1 come with a Window Maker deb compiled with
> > --enable-kde?
>
> Probably not. Debian is lame.
>
2.1, No. That's because the WindowMaker version in 2.1 is 0.20,
which didn't yet support KDE. Presumably, the support was added after
the 2.1 fre
Montreal Thu Feb 18 17:21:22 1999
George Richard Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Navindra Umanee wrote:
>
> > Personally, I recommend that you don't use the .debs because you won't
> > find debs for any of the many other KDE applications available. I
> > think it is better that you keep KDE
Navindra Umanee wrote:
> Personally, I recommend that you don't use the .debs because you won't
> find debs for any of the many other KDE applications available. I
> think it is better that you keep KDE separate in /opt/kde or
> /usr/local/kde and use a program such as Smart Install to keep track
Montreal Thu Feb 18 07:43:30 1999
MacKenzie, Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is my understanding that on Debian, the KDEDIR variable
> does not have to be set. I could be wrong but I think I read that
> somewhere.
>
> I just installed KDE1.1 Debs from KDE.org an
On 17-Feb-99 MacKenzie, Andrew wrote:
> It is my understanding that on Debian, the KDEDIR variable
> does not have to be set. I could be wrong but I think I read that
> somewhere.
>
I have been told that by another person, but this was after I "fixed" the
problem. He told me that
It is my understanding that on Debian, the KDEDIR variable
does not have to be set. I could be wrong but I think I read that
somewhere.
I just installed KDE1.1 Debs from KDE.org and unless dpkg
modified my .bashrc, the KDEDIR is not set and all works fine.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sun, 14 Feb 1999, Pollywog wrote:
> What does one do about KDEDIR after installing the Debian KDE packages?
> I want to install kxicq (from source) but it complains about not finding KDE.
> I can even find KDE with the 'locate' command, and it is working. Th
On 15-Feb-99 debian wrote:
>
> Forgive me if I am wrong, as it has been 2 years since I ran KDE. But I
> remember back on Slackware when I had to compile it. That it requires the
> KDEDIR environment variable which points to the KDE installed location. Is
> this what it could be complaining about
Forgive me if I am wrong, as it has been 2 years since I ran KDE. But I
remember back on Slackware when I had to compile it. That it requires the
KDEDIR environment variable which points to the KDE installed location. Is
this what it could be complaining about. Maybe you should put export
KDEDIR="
14 matches
Mail list logo
