Re: KDE debs

2000-09-07 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Danny Pansters wrote: > Hi everyone, > > The kde.tdyc.com Woody tree for kde2 has been emptied, I'm sure > of it because I used to apt kde2 from there. I don't know why the packages have been cleared out. Ask Ivan E. Moore II. > Anyway, I hope that the kde2 debs will be added to the normal de

Re: KDE debs

2000-09-07 Thread Danny Pansters
Hi everyone, The kde.tdyc.com Woody tree for kde2 has been emptied, I'm sure of it because I used to apt kde2 from there. I happened to have been reinstalling my Woody box from scratch yesterday (the 6th), starting from a couple of potato disks. All went well, but when it came to installing kde2 b

Re: KDE debs

2000-09-06 Thread Scott_Patterson
> The fact is that most, if not all the mirrors are just EMPTY, for example > ftp://download.sourceforge.net/pub/mirrors/kde/stable/latest/distribution/deb/potato/i386/ > > has nothing, nada, zero files. > So, I suppose that unless someone indicates what to do, KDE is for the most part > closed

Re: KDE debs

2000-09-05 Thread Mike Werner
Antonio Rodriguez wrote: > That URL doesn't work. There is probably some little mistake in the URL, I > used the > one you mean, and I got a bunch of broken links, etc. > You mean > http://kde.tdyc.com/ , but again, didn't work good. http://kde.tdyc.com/Debian/ should have answers for you. -- Mi

Re: KDE debs

2000-09-05 Thread Antonio Rodriguez
That URL doesn't work. There is probably some little mistake in the URL, I used the one you mean, and I got a bunch of broken links, etc. You mean http://kde.tdyc.com/ , but again, didn't work good. "John L . Fjellstad" wrote: > On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 06:57:42PM -0400, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:

Re: KDE debs

2000-09-05 Thread John L . Fjellstad
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 06:57:42PM -0400, Antonio Rodriguez wrote: > I haven't been able to find any valuable information. Does anyone have any > idea? what about ftp://kde.kdyc.com/pub/kde? -- John__ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: KDE debs

2000-09-05 Thread Antonio Rodriguez
The fact is that most, if not all the mirrors are just EMPTY, for example ftp://download.sourceforge.net/pub/mirrors/kde/stable/latest/distribution/deb/potato/i386/ has nothing, nada, zero files. So, I suppose that unless someone indicates what to do, KDE is for the most part closed for Debian use

Re: KDE debs

2000-09-05 Thread kmself
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 04:10:04PM -0400, Antonio Rodriguez wrote: > Does any one know if the collection of kde debs is complete? Last time I > tried to download it it gave me a bunch of broken-missing links and > files. So I just stopped trying. May be the reason is that the packager > (Ivan, I be

Re: KDE debs

1999-02-05 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Fri, 5 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Curious about something... > > I didn't know there was a qt-1.42.deb available, so yesterday I downloaded the > qt source and compiled my own. I have libc6.2.0.7t - do I need to upgrade to > a new version to get th

Re: KDE debs

1999-02-05 Thread MallarJ
In a message dated 2/5/99 6:08:11 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Sorry Noah, but the potato qt1g_1.42-1.deb depends on libc6 (>= 2.0.7u), > which is not standard on a Hamm System. You've got at least to use a > Slink-System (which is not available on CD, so let

Re: KDE debs

1999-02-05 Thread MallarJ
In a message dated 2/5/99 6:05:58 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >> > >> Will they run on hamm systems? > >> > > Noah> The only dependency that isn't satisfied by hamm is the Qt package. > You > Noah> need Qt 1.42 from potato. That Qt package will install on a ham

Re: KDE debs

1999-02-05 Thread Peter Weiss
> On Tue, 2 Feb 1999 11:49:00 -0500 (EST), "Noah L. Meyerhans" <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> said: Noah> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Noah> On Tue, 2 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> Will they run on hamm systems? >> Noah> The only dependency that isn't satisfied by hamm is the Q

Re: KDE debs

1999-02-03 Thread John Galt
Not live, per se, just Marshmallows :) On Tue, 2 Feb 1999, Jens B. Jorgensen wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Anyone got the KDE debs for 1.1pre2 up yet? I'm sure we're all waiting with > > baited breath... > > Why, have we all been eating live bait? > > -- > Jens B. Jorgensen > [EMAI

Re: KDE debs

1999-02-02 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Tue, 2 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Do you need to install them in any particular order? > kdelibs, kdesupport, kdebase, everything else. The dependecies are set up correctly, so dpkg will tell you if you need to install one of the other packag

Re: KDE debs

1999-02-02 Thread MallarJ
In a message dated 2/2/99 11:03:06 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > You don't. There's no Packages file on the ftp site, so you can't use apt > or dselect. You need to manually download all the .deb using your > favorite ftp client and install them with dpkg. > > noah >

Re: KDE debs

1999-02-02 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Tue, 2 Feb 1999, Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira wrote: > How I put this line of KDE in source.list to apt read them? > Reggards, Paulo Henrique You don't. There's no Packages file on the ftp site, so you can't use apt or dsel

RE: KDE debs

1999-02-02 Thread Becher, Andrew
mmm, live bait... -Original Message- From: Jens B. Jorgensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 1999 11:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: KDE debs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Anyone got the KDE debs for 1.1pre2 up yet? I

Re: KDE debs

1999-02-02 Thread Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira
How I put this line of KDE in source.list to apt read them? Reggards, Paulo Henrique Quoting Noah L. Meyerhans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > On Tue, 2 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Anyone got the KDE debs for 1.1pre2 up yet?

Re: KDE debs

1999-02-02 Thread MallarJ
In a message dated 2/2/99 10:49:13 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > The only dependency that isn't satisfied by hamm is the Qt package. You > need Qt 1.42 from potato. That Qt package will install on a hamm system, > though, so you don't need to try upgrading your whole sy

Re: KDE debs

1999-02-02 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Tue, 2 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Will they run on hamm systems? > The only dependency that isn't satisfied by hamm is the Qt package. You need Qt 1.42 from potato. That Qt package will install on a hamm system, though, so you don't need to tr

Re: KDE debs

1999-02-02 Thread Jens B. Jorgensen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Anyone got the KDE debs for 1.1pre2 up yet? I'm sure we're all waiting with > baited breath... Why, have we all been eating live bait? -- Jens B. Jorgensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: KDE debs

1999-02-02 Thread MallarJ
In a message dated 2/2/99 10:39:00 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Anyone got the KDE debs for 1.1pre2 up yet? I'm sure we're all waiting > with > > baited breath... > > They're available on all the KDE ftp mirrors. > /pub/kde/stable/1.1pre2/distribution/deb/potato/

Re: KDE debs

1999-02-02 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Tue, 2 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Anyone got the KDE debs for 1.1pre2 up yet? I'm sure we're all waiting with > baited breath... They're available on all the KDE ftp mirrors. /pub/kde/stable/1.1pre2/distribution/deb/potato/ noah PGP public key