debian-u...@howorth.org.uk writes:
>> I don't understand, there is no ImageMagick ML/group
>> registered on Gmane, and just some <10 people on
>> #imagemagick on Libera?
>>
>> People don't care about this software which is the CLI
>> powerhouse for image editing?
>
> I occasionally us
Emanuel Berg wrote:
> I don't understand, there is no ImageMagick ML/group
> registered on Gmane, and just some <10 people on #imagemagick
> on Libera?
>
> People don't care about this software which is the CLI
> powerhouse for image editing?
I occasionally use ImageMagick but never
I don't understand, there is no ImageMagick ML/group
registered on Gmane, and just some <10 people on #imagemagick
on Libera?
People don't care about this software which is the CLI
powerhouse for image editing?
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
On 1/17/22, deloptes wrote:
> local10 wrote:
>
>> Those who suggest that you use google are not your friends. You can start
>> here:
>>
>> 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Google
>>
>> 2. https://nomoregoogle.com/
>>
>
> Oh come on, it is a synonym for a search engine. Of course it is
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 12:29:39PM +0100, deloptes wrote:
> local10 wrote:
>
> > Those who suggest that you use google are not your friends. You can start
> > here:
> >
> > 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Google
> >
> > 2. https://nomoregoogle.com/
> >
>
> Oh come on, it is a syn
local10 wrote:
> Those who suggest that you use google are not your friends. You can start
> here:
>
> 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Google
>
> 2. https://nomoregoogle.com/
>
Oh come on, it is a synonym for a search engine. Of course it is a sh*t
business model they have toward
Jan 17, 2022, 04:01 by moasenw...@zoho.eu:
> local10 wrote:
>
>>> Is google broken where you live?
>>>
>>
>> It's 2022, who in the right mind would use g**gle nowadays?!
>>
>
> ...
>
> Didn't this use to be a friendly place?
>
Those who suggest that you use google are not your friends. You can s
Jan 17, 2022, 00:47 by emanoil.kot...@deloptes.org:
> Is google broken where you live?
>
It's 2022, who in the right mind would use g**gle nowadays?!
https://nomoregoogle.com/
Emanuel Berg wrote:
> attempt to perform an operation not allowed by the security policy `PDF' @
> error/constitute.c/IsCoderAuthorized/421
Is google broken where you live?
https://askubuntu.com/questions/1127260/imagemagick-convert-not-allowed
--
FCD6 3719 0FFB F1BF 38EA 4727 5348 5F1F DCFE BC
On Wed 06 Jul 2016 at 10:32:10 (-0400), H. E. Çitak wrote:
> Dear Debian Users, imagemagick-q16 takes grabs pdf "helper" ay as default
> position,
I can't parse 'imagemagick-q16 takes grabs pdf "helper" ay as default position'
> and when you uninstall it, takesout gnuift and inkscape in
> synapti
So it turns out the policy.xml files are different between the two versions
and removing the restrictions on @ in /etc/ImageMagick-6/policy.xml almost
works. Well, it does work to read from files, but not from stdin.
Interesting. I went back and downloaded the source tarball that the armhf
deb pac
On 2016-03-02, wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 05:22:21PM +0100, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
>> On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 13:09 +, Curt wrote:
>> > I don't how to solve this problem. Why an open source program would
>> > ask
>> > for a proprietary font in order to work is beyond my comprehension.
>
On 2016-03-02, wrote:
>
> To slowly crawl near, try
>
> display -font '-b&h-*-*-r-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*'
>
> (I'm assuming you've got some b&h fonts, like lucida -- otherwise use
> a font spec of an existing font; in a pinch, make sure you have the
> program xfontsel and you can do:
>
> display
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 05:22:21PM +0100, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 13:09 +, Curt wrote:
> > I don't how to solve this problem. Why an open source program would
> > ask
> > for a proprietary font in order to work is beyond my c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:54:26PM +, Curt wrote:
> On 2016-03-02, wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 01:09:54PM +, Curt wrote:
> >>
> >> Trying to run the 'display' command from ImageMagick without an argument
> >> gives the following "
On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 13:09 +, Curt wrote:
> I don't how to solve this problem. Why an open source program would
> ask
> for a proprietary font in order to work is beyond my comprehension.
I doubt it needs it, it wouldn't be in Debian main if it did.
I'm guessing this is some configuration
On 2016-03-02, wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 01:09:54PM +, Curt wrote:
>>
>> Trying to run the 'display' command from ImageMagick without an argument
>> gives the following "error" (the app does not open at all):
>>
>> curty@einstein:~$ display
>> display.im6: unable to load font
>> `-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 01:09:54PM +, Curt wrote:
>
> Trying to run the 'display' command from ImageMagick without an argument
> gives the following "error" (the app does not open at all):
>
> curty@einstein:~$ display
> display.im6: unable to lo
On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 15:04:28 +0200, Ben wrote:
> 2009/4/5 Ansgar Burchardt:
>
> > apt-file can search for files in packages that are not installed on the
> > local machine:
> >
> > % apt-file search /usr/bin/MagickWand-config
> > libmagickwand-dev: /usr/bin/MagickWand-config
>
> Thanks for
2009/4/5 Ansgar Burchardt
> apt-file can search for files in packages that are not installed on the
> local machine:
>
> % apt-file search /usr/bin/MagickWand-config
> libmagickwand-dev: /usr/bin/MagickWand-config
Thanks for the fast reply but this isn't working for me.
relay:/usr/bin# apt-fi
Hi,
Ben writes:
> where is the binary called "MagickWand-config"? Can't find it in any
> package or source belonging to this.
apt-file can search for files in packages that are not installed on the
local machine:
% apt-file search /usr/bin/MagickWand-config
libmagickwand-dev: /usr/bin/Magi
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 05:45:18PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
>>
>> See bug #420672, followup 4.
>>
>
> Thanks. Checked that. It was in April 2007 and we still have no idea
> when it might be uploaded. Not blaming anyone.
>
> Downloaded and compiled the source. Everything is working
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 05:45:18PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
>
> See bug #420672, followup 4.
>
Thanks. Checked that. It was in April 2007 and we still have no idea
when it might be uploaded. Not blaming anyone.
Downloaded and compiled the source. Everything is working fine. Will
wai
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 21:00:07 +0530, Sridhar M.A. wrote:
> I do not know whether this has been answered or not (for I could not
> find anything in the archives) : Is there any reason that the newer
> version of imagemagick is not even in the unstables branch?
See bug #420672, followup 4.
--
R
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 06:31:09PM +0100, Johannes Zellner wrote:
> Hi, me again,
>
> If I've installed geomview installing imagemagick fails because:
>
> ...
> Unpacking imagemagick (from .../imagemagick_5.2.5-2_i386.deb) ...
> dpkg: error processing
> /var/cache/apt/archives/imagemagick_5.2.5-2
On Tue, Apr 11, 2000 at 03:18:52PM -0800, Christopher S. Swingley wrote:
> I'm trying to convert MPEG files to animated GIF images using
> ImageMagick's 'convert' program. It says
>
> sh: mpeg2decode: command not found
> convert: delegate failed (mpeg2decode -q -b %i -f -r -o3 %o%%05d).
On Tue, Jun 15, 1999 at 19:49:47 +1000, Tim Burgess wrote:
> gcc -o example -O -I/usr/X11R6/include/magick -L/usr/X11R6/lib example.c
> \
> -lMagick -ltiff -ljpeg -lX11 -lz -lm
Make that
gcc -o example -O -I/usr/X11R6/include/ -I/usr/X11R6/include/magick \
-L/usr/X11R6/lib example.c
On 08-Mar-99 Egon Schmid wrote:
> Where is ImageMagick on Debian? I installed now the source but cannot
> compile it. Have someone tried to compile version 4.2.1?
>
Pop up dselect and click the '/' key. Then type in image. Should take you
right to image magick. The '\' ketyy repeats a search.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
> The problem is as follows:
> the input file is a tiff image who has 1 bit/sample and after an=20
>mogrify -geometry x%=20
> i get an image with 8 bit/sample.
>
> I've search the man page without success.
> Please Help. It's very critical.
Tryman convert
i see the same problem running the latest from unstable + kernel
2.0.32.
--alex--
--
| I believe the moment is at hand when, by a paranoiac and active |
| advance of the mind, it will be possible (simultaneously with |
| automatism and other passive states) to systematize confusion |
| and
On Thu, 20 Nov 1997, Kingsley G. Morse Jr. wrote:
> Will someone please test the 3.9.0-1 (unstable) version of Imagemagick to
> see if it releases shared memory on your box? It doesn't on mine, and I'd
> like to verify that it's a bug in Imagemagick, and not my box, before I
> file a bug report. H
"Kingsley G. Morse Jr." wrote:
>Will someone please test the 3.9.0-1 (unstable) version of Imagemagick to
>see if it releases shared memory on your box?
>
>Please post your results to this list so other people won't duplicate your
>effort.
I see the bug on this system
linda:~/.netsc
On Thu, 19 Sep 1996, Philippe Troin wrote:
>
> Err, imagemagick has never been placed in the 'stable' tree. It used to
be (and will be until the next version) in the non-free directory which
has no distinction between stable and unstable.
> Maybe we should address this...
>
non-free has always b
Philippe Troin wrote:
>
>
> Err, imagemagick has never been placed in the 'stable' tree. It used to be
> (and will be until the next version) in the non-free directory which has no
> distinction between stable and unstable.
I experienced the same problem with gs. As a new user not very famili
On Wed, 18 Sep 1996 15:00:08 PDT Randy Gobbel ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> This brings up something that been annoying me: I've run into this and similar
> problems two or three times now, where a package is placed onto the "stable"
> area before the packages it depends on. This is a problem fo
I get the following messages:
imagemagick depends on libtiff3
libtiff3 does not appear to be available.
Q1: Can somebody tell me where I can find libtiff3 ?
Q2: Is it a .deb installation file ?
A1: in the graphics section of the archive (the unstabl
> Q1: Can somebody tell me where I can find libtiff3 ?
> Q2: Is it a .deb installation file ?
Yes and yes.
The deb for libtiff3 is on:
ftp://ftp.debian.org/pub/debian/rex/binary/graphics/libtiff3_3.4beta035-1.deb
I could have supported libgr, but it's obsolete and moved to libtiff. libjpeg
and li
37 matches
Mail list logo
