Re: HW Raid

2010-02-17 Thread Alex Samad
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 01:27:41PM +, Glyn Astill wrote: > --- On Wed, 17/2/10, Alex Samad wrote: > > Hi [snip] > > > > We're using Adaptec 5805's here, not sure on the situation now, but I had to > run the storman client through alien to get it installed on debian - but it > all runs as

Re: HW Raid

2010-02-17 Thread Glyn Astill
--- On Wed, 17/2/10, Alex Samad wrote: > Hi > > Thanks for all the input. I did some more research on the > high point and > even though it talks about smartctl it doesn't actually get > you through > to each device. > > I have now started to look at the adaptec 51245, 3 x sas > connectors with

Re: HW Raid

2010-02-16 Thread Alex Samad
't work inside Debian. > > Cheers, > James > > -Original Message- > From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Camaleón > Sent: February 15, 2010 5:25 AM > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: HW Raid > > On Mon, 15 Feb 2010

RE: HW Raid

2010-02-16 Thread James Wu
bian. Cheers, James -Original Message- From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Camaleón Sent: February 15, 2010 5:25 AM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: HW Raid On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:15:43 +1100, Alex Samad wrote: (...) > What I am looking at is the ab

Re: HW Raid

2010-02-15 Thread Camaleón
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:15:43 +1100, Alex Samad wrote: (...) > What I am looking at is the ability to monitor the array from within > linux, sort of like mdadm does, so that if/when a drive goes faulty I > will be notified. I would also like to be able to use smartctl on the > individual drives so

Re: HW Raid

2010-02-14 Thread Victor Padro
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Alex Samad wrote: > Hi > > I am looking at buying a hardware raid controller, I have been an > advocate of software raid for quite a while, but having run into some > problems running a 10 disk home server, I figure its time to bit the > bullet and buy a good/nice

Re: HW raid 0 setup

2002-10-24 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Kevin Coyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.24.1654 +0200]: > SCSI device sda: 35094528 512-byte hdwr sectors (17968 MB) > SCSI device sdb: 35094528 512-byte hdwr sectors (17968 MB) > > Is this correct? Since I'm setting this up as Raid0, shouldn't sda and > sdb be half that size at 898

Re: HW raid 0 setup

2002-10-24 Thread nate
Kevin Coyner said: > > SCSI device sda: 35094528 512-byte hdwr sectors (17968 MB) > SCSI device sdb: 35094528 512-byte hdwr sectors (17968 MB) > > Is this correct? Since I'm setting this up as Raid0, shouldn't sda and > sdb be half that size at 8984MB each? Or is it typical of Raid0 to > report

Re: HW raid 0 setup

2002-10-24 Thread Chris Hilts
>> Is this correct? Since I'm setting this up as Raid0, shouldn't sda and >> sdb be half that size at 8984MB each? Or is it typical of Raid0 to >> report the combined size of the two drives it uses for striping? Speaking of hardware RAID, I've set up a RAID-1 (mirroring) array on my server. Eve

Re: HW raid 0 setup

2002-10-24 Thread Kevin Coyner
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 09:02:41AM -0700, nate wrote.. > Kevin Coyner said: > > > SCSI device sda: 35094528 512-byte hdwr sectors (17968 MB) > > SCSI device sdb: 35094528 512-byte hdwr sectors (17968 MB) > > > > Is this correct? Since I'm setting this up as Raid0, shouldn't sda and > > sdb