On 12/6/13, Reco wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 11:54:43AM +0100, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote:
>> Ralf Mardorf writes:
>> > On Fr, 2013-12-06 at 14:02 +0400, Reco wrote:
>> > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 10:09:02AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> > > > GTK is a PITA and will always cause similar warni
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:37:45PM -0800, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Dec 2013, Stephen Powell wrote:
>
> > Well, the latest update to Debian jessie did it. GNOME 3 apparently
> > no longer has a "fallback mode" for X drivers which don't support 3D
> > acceleration. Mine doesn't. And the
On 12/06/2013 02:44 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 14:04 -0800, Gary Roach wrote:
After reading through this topic I find myself ask what happened to KDE.
I know its old and is probably bloated. But, with 500 GB of disk space,
4GB of RAM and a 4 processor CPU, who cares. Its solid
On Friday, December 06, 2013 05:04:49 PM Gary Roach wrote:
> On 12/06/2013 01:56 AM, Reco wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 10:35:30AM +0100, François Patte wrote:
> with acroread (on start):
>
> (acroread:30504): Gtk-WARNING **: Unable to locate theme engine in
> module_path:
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 14:04 -0800, Gary Roach wrote:
> After reading through this topic I find myself ask what happened to KDE.
> I know its old and is probably bloated. But, with 500 GB of disk space,
> 4GB of RAM and a 4 processor CPU, who cares. Its solid. I like it and
> have never liked Gno
On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 14:04:49 -0800
Gary Roach wrote:
> >
> After reading through this topic I find myself ask what happened to
> KDE. I know its old and is probably bloated. But, with 500 GB of disk
> space, 4GB of RAM and a 4 processor CPU, who cares. Its solid. I like
> it and have never liked
On 12/06/2013 01:56 AM, Reco wrote:
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 10:35:30AM +0100, François Patte wrote:
with acroread (on start):
(acroread:30504): Gtk-WARNING **: Unable to locate theme engine in
module_path: "xfce",
The acroread needs i386 libraries from gtk2-engines-xfce package.
If I try to i
On Fri, 6 Dec 2013 11:57:55 +0200
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Vi, 06 dec 13, 08:20:56, Joe wrote:
> >
> > I had used the fallback mode, but I then wandered off and tried Xfce
> > and LXDE, and stayed with the latter. It's a pig to get the Debian
> > menu to display on LXDE, if you use that, and I
On Fr, 2013-12-06 at 19:40 +, Joe wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 11:54:28 +0100
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
>
> > I'm sorry, I can't contribute more to this thread, since I already
> > pointed everything out.
> >
>
> OK, that's a good one.
And it's meant with a ";)". But I really thought it won
On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 11:54:28 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> I'm sorry, I can't contribute more to this thread, since I already
> pointed everything out.
>
OK, that's a good one.
--
Joe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Fr, 2013-12-06 at 17:19 +0100, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote:
> That does not mean that I am against graphic output. Ralf's sound
> samples and my graphs and icons are graphical objects. With you can
> have several terminals and copy and paste text among each other.
>
> What I don't like is the posit
On Thu 05 Dec 2013 at 18:24:13 -0500, Bo Lan wrote:
> Although I am not sure if XFCE or LXDE is good or bad, I am kind of
> agree with your opinion about the usability under such an free X driver.
> According to Debian's policy, Debian is an organization that highly
> respects completely free soft
Reco writes:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 11:54:43AM +0100, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote:
> > Ralf Mardorf writes:
> > > On Fr, 2013-12-06 at 14:02 +0400, Reco wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 10:09:02AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > > > GTK is a PITA and will always cause similar warnings
Ralf Mardorf writes:
> On Fr, 2013-12-06 at 11:54 +0100, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote:
> > Ralf Mardorf writes:
> > > On Fr, 2013-12-06 at 14:02 +0400, Reco wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 10:09:02AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > > > GTK is a PITA and will always cause similar warnings
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 11:54:43AM +0100, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote:
> Ralf Mardorf writes:
> > On Fr, 2013-12-06 at 14:02 +0400, Reco wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 10:09:02AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > > GTK is a PITA and will always cause similar warnings,
> > >
> > > I disagree.
On Fr, 2013-12-06 at 11:54 +0100, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote:
> Ralf Mardorf writes:
> > On Fr, 2013-12-06 at 14:02 +0400, Reco wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 10:09:02AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > > GTK is a PITA and will always cause similar warnings,
> > >
> > > I disagree. My .xse
Ralf Mardorf writes:
> On Fr, 2013-12-06 at 14:02 +0400, Reco wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 10:09:02AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > GTK is a PITA and will always cause similar warnings,
> >
> > I disagree. My .xsession-errors does not contain similar warnings.
>
> What DE do you u
On Fr, 2013-12-06 at 14:26 +0400, Reco wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 12:17:20PM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Vi, 06 dec 13, 11:12:37, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > On Fr, 2013-12-06 at 14:02 +0400, Reco wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 10:09:02AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > >
> > >
On Fr, 2013-12-06 at 11:36 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fr, 2013-12-06 at 14:23 +0400, Reco wrote:
> > I just stay clear of anything that's linked against
> > libgconf.so.
>
> The real issues are caused by libdconf, libgconf is quasi obsolet. I
> already must install libdconf for audio producti
On Fr, 2013-12-06 at 12:17 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Vi, 06 dec 13, 11:12:37, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Fr, 2013-12-06 at 14:02 +0400, Reco wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 10:09:02AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >
> > > > Very likely that
> > > > even GNOME doesn't continue using GTK
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 12:17:20PM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Vi, 06 dec 13, 11:12:37, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Fr, 2013-12-06 at 14:02 +0400, Reco wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 10:09:02AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >
> > > > This are not Xfce, KDE
> > > > etc. bugs and they are
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 11:12:37AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fr, 2013-12-06 at 14:02 +0400, Reco wrote:
> > I disagree. My .xsession-errors does not contain similar warnings.
>
> What DE do you use? It's new to me that there aren't those issues
> outside GNOME. There's nothing the other DEs
On Vi, 06 dec 13, 11:12:37, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fr, 2013-12-06 at 14:02 +0400, Reco wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 10:09:02AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > > This are not Xfce, KDE
> > > etc. bugs and they are also not Debian related, this is caused by
> > > GTK/GNOME upstream's ignora
On Fr, 2013-12-06 at 14:02 +0400, Reco wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 10:09:02AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > GTK is a PITA and will always cause similar warnings,
>
> I disagree. My .xsession-errors does not contain similar warnings.
What DE do you use? It's new to me that there aren't those
Le 06/12/2013 10:52, Ralf Mardorf a écrit :
> On Fr, 2013-12-06 at 10:35 +0100, François Patte wrote:
>> Le 06/12/2013 09:51, Reco a écrit :
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 09:39:03AM +0100, François Patte wrote:
It could a nice choice, but there are many things to fix! I made the
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 10:09:02AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> GTK is a PITA and will always cause similar warnings,
I disagree. My .xsession-errors does not contain similar warnings.
> but GTK also does
> cause really serious issues, if you e.g. launch a GNOME editor with root
> privileges, th
On Vi, 06 dec 13, 12:29:14, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> >
> > Maybe there's a wiki page on the topic? If not, maybe we could start one?
>
> Or debian-ot@... :)
Why off-topic? This is Debian related.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Offtopic discussions among Debia
On Vi, 06 dec 13, 08:20:56, Joe wrote:
>
> I had used the fallback mode, but I then wandered off and tried Xfce
> and LXDE, and stayed with the latter. It's a pig to get the Debian menu
> to display on LXDE, if you use that, and I don't know if Xfce has the
> same trouble.
I seem to recall you me
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 10:35:30AM +0100, François Patte wrote:
> >> with acroread (on start):
> >>
> >> (acroread:30504): Gtk-WARNING **: Unable to locate theme engine in
> >> module_path: "xfce",
> >
> > The acroread needs i386 libraries from gtk2-engines-xfce package.
>
> If I try to install t
On Fr, 2013-12-06 at 10:35 +0100, François Patte wrote:
> Le 06/12/2013 09:51, Reco a écrit :
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 09:39:03AM +0100, François Patte wrote:
> >> It could a nice choice, but there are many things to fix! I made the
> >> choice of xfce at my wheezy install and as I
Le 06/12/2013 09:51, Reco a écrit :
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 09:39:03AM +0100, François Patte wrote:
>> It could a nice choice, but there are many things to fix! I made the
>> choice of xfce at my wheezy install and as I use terminals and cli to
>> launch my stuff, there are a lot of warn
On Fr, 2013-12-06 at 12:51 +0400, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 09:39:03AM +0100, François Patte wrote:
> > It could a nice choice, but there are many things to fix! I made the
> > choice of xfce at my wheezy install and as I use terminals and cli to
> > launch my stuff, there are
Hi.
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 09:39:03AM +0100, François Patte wrote:
> It could a nice choice, but there are many things to fix! I made the
> choice of xfce at my wheezy install and as I use terminals and cli to
> launch my stuff, there are a lot of warnings, for instance:
>
> when I quit evince:
Le 05/12/2013 22:46, Stephen Powell a écrit :
> Well, the latest update to Debian jessie did it. GNOME 3 apparently
> no longer has a "fallback mode" for X drivers which don't support 3D
> acceleration. Mine doesn't. And the native GNOME 3 interface is
> apparently unusable with such an X driver
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 17:13:04 -0500 (EST)
Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Dec 2013 17:01:37 -0500 (EST), Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >
> > All GTK dependent DEs have their drawbacks. Xfce still is and will
> > be my DE for a while, but I'm already testing Razor-Qt. It's not
> > that good at the momen
On Thu, 05 Dec 2013 17:07:44 -0500 (EST), Tom H wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:46 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
>> ...
>> I hope Debian will make XFCE the
>> default desktop for the production jessie installer.
>
> It is for the time being.
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=tasksel/tasksel.g
On 12/6/13, Rick Thomas wrote:
> On Dec 5, 2013, at 4:37 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
>> You could do what I did with my install of Wheezy 64-bit (Replacing
>> Fedora 12): Abandon the desktop "environment" entirely, and just use a
>> full-featured window manager and a few utilities. I found Openb
On Dec 5, 2013, at 4:37 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> You could do what I did with my install of Wheezy 64-bit (Replacing
> Fedora 12): Abandon the desktop "environment" entirely, and just use a
> full-featured window manager and a few utilities. I found Openbox with
> LXPanel works just fine. L
On Thu, 05 Dec 2013, Stephen Powell wrote:
> Well, the latest update to Debian jessie did it. GNOME 3 apparently
> no longer has a "fallback mode" for X drivers which don't support 3D
> acceleration. Mine doesn't. And the native GNOME 3 interface is
> apparently unusable with such an X driver.
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 18:24 -0500, Bo Lan wrote:
> I am still a new user, and don't know if we can report a bug to Debian
> to say that, GNOME SHELL or Foo Desktop Environment is not usable under
> 2D free video card driver or such. Actually, I hope Debian can patch
> those DE, free drivers, and so
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 16:46 -0500, Stephen Powell wrote:
> Well, the latest update to Debian jessie did it. GNOME 3 apparently
> no longer has a "fallback mode" for X drivers which don't support 3D
> acceleration. Mine doesn't. And the native GNOME 3 interface is
> apparently unusable with such
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 17:13 -0500, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Dec 2013 17:01:37 -0500 (EST), Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >
> > All GTK dependent DEs have their drawbacks. Xfce still is and will be my
> > DE for a while, but I'm already testing Razor-Qt. It's not that good at
> > the moment, but
On Thu, 05 Dec 2013 17:01:37 -0500 (EST), Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> All GTK dependent DEs have their drawbacks. Xfce still is and will be my
> DE for a while, but I'm already testing Razor-Qt. It's not that good at
> the moment, but since LXDE is similar ok as Xfce is, it might be
> interesting to w
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:46 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
>
> Well, the latest update to Debian jessie did it. GNOME 3 apparently
> no longer has a "fallback mode" for X drivers which don't support 3D
> acceleration. Mine doesn't. And the native GNOME 3 interface is
> apparently unusable with such
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 16:46 -0500, Stephen Powell wrote:
> Well, the latest update to Debian jessie did it. GNOME 3 apparently
> no longer has a "fallback mode" for X drivers which don't support 3D
> acceleration. Mine doesn't. And the native GNOME 3 interface is
> apparently unusable with such
On Mon, 3 Jun 2013 17:14:36 -0400
Harry Prevor wrote:
> On 6/3/13, Kailash Kalyani wrote:
> > I tried the install a couple of days ago on my laptop. I got an
> > offer to resize
> > my windows partition. Can't recall getting an option to install
> > inside the NTFS partition.
>
> Correct me if
On 6/3/13, Kailash Kalyani wrote:
> I tried the install a couple of days ago on my laptop. I got an offer to
> resize
> my windows partition. Can't recall getting an option to install inside the
> NTFS partition.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I *believe* how goodbye-microsoft works
is that it inst
On Monday 03 Jun 2013 6:50:03 PM Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > The reviews I read said the same or similar, but an Aussie tech
> > magazine from 2007 said that after the standard installer starts,
> > Debian is installed as a single file on the Windows partition--no
> > partitioning needed.
>
> That w
> The reviews I read said the same or similar, but an Aussie tech
> magazine from 2007 said that after the standard installer starts,
> Debian is installed as a single file on the Windows partition--no
> partitioning needed.
That was not the case for me. I was offered to resize the ntfs
partition
On Sb, 11 mai 13, 22:30:37, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> The reviews I read said the same or similar, but an Aussie tech
> magazine from 2007 said that after the standard installer starts,
> Debian is installed as a single file on the Windows partition--no
> partitioning needed.
I've done a few win3
On Sun, 12 May 2013, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 09:07:36PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > Been reading about this install method, but can't find anything more
> > current than about 4 or 5 years ago. It seems that "goodbye"
> > installs Debian onto Windows' C: drive as a single
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 09:07:36PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> Been reading about this install method, but can't find anything more
> current than about 4 or 5 years ago. It seems that "goodbye" installs
> Debian onto Windows' C: drive as a single large file, and that is where
> it is run from.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 05:00:27PM -0400, Hal Vaughan was
heard to say:
> Also, by the time I started using Java, I had learned that many times
> when I write something, I'm revisiting later and have forgotten it, so
> making sure my Javadoc comments were clear enough that I wouldn't have
>
>Given the ghastliness of maintaining Perl code
I've had to maintain perl code at work, so you have my sympathies.
But in Perl's defense, it's not a necessary characteristic of Perl to
be hard to maintain. It's just the inherent flexibility of the
language that makes it easier to write "Write On
Thus spoke Master Foo:
>Uncommented code can be a nightmare in ANY language!
and Nubi was enlightened.
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/
On Jun 25, 2009, at 4:37 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 08:30:33AM +0200, Javier Barroso wrote:
Hi,
2009/6/25 明覺 :
I do not have time to read your replies about another discussion
anymore for they are useless, and I do not feel happy with all you
debian guys, so I leave this m
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 08:30:33AM +0200, Javier Barroso wrote:
> Hi,
> 2009/6/25 明覺 :
> > I do not have time to read your replies about another discussion
> > anymore for they are useless, and I do not feel happy with all you
> > debian guys, so I leave this mailing list, also debian has no
> > at
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 07:08:34AM -0500, Allen Meyers wrote:
> I have not followed this thread and getting in only at the end but it
> caught my attention simply because I left Ubuntu for the very same
> reason, but my ire was directed towards the idiots not the experienced
> users.
> I have tried
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 6:33 AM, Daryl Styrk wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 08:26:25AM +0800, 明覺 wrote:
>> I do not have time to read your replies about another discussion
>> anymore for they are useless, and I do not feel happy with all you
>> debian guys, so I leave this mailing list, also debi
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 08:26:25AM +0800, 明覺 wrote:
> I do not have time to read your replies about another discussion
> anymore for they are useless, and I do not feel happy with all you
> debian guys, so I leave this mailing list, also debian has no
> attraction to me anymore, I will stop using i
Hi,
2009/6/25 明覺 :
> I do not have time to read your replies about another discussion
> anymore for they are useless, and I do not feel happy with all you
> debian guys, so I leave this mailing list, also debian has no
> attraction to me anymore, I will stop using it from now.
> As I have decalared
明覺 wrote:
> I do not have time to read your replies about another discussion
> anymore for they are useless, and I do not feel happy with all you
> debian guys, so I leave this mailing list, also debian has no
> attraction to me anymore, I will stop using it from now.
> As I have decalared, I will
明覺 wrote:
> As I have decalared, I will build my own OS and applications by a
> "Only One Programming Lanuguage" way.
> Good bye! :)
Good luck!
It really is a shame that apparently no one stepped in to help you
reprogram a great part of the debian archives in c/c++. To some
estimations that's jus
Am 2009-06-25 04:26:53, schrieb Oliver Schneider:
> > As I have decalared, I will build my own OS and applications by a
> > "Only One Programming Lanuguage" way.
> However, I hope the one language isn't assembler. I really can't
> imagine shell scripting that way - well, if you take "Only One
> Pro
> As I have decalared, I will build my own OS and applications by a
> "Only One Programming Lanuguage" way.
However, I hope the one language isn't assembler. I really can't imagine shell
scripting that way - well, if you take "Only One Programming Lanuguage" serious
that is ... ;)
> Good bye! :)
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Adriano
Trentini wrote:
> Goodbye, Mr. Shi.
> However, I always received many help from debian users.
>
> --- Em qua, 24/6/09, 明覺 escreveu:
>
> De: 明覺
> Assunto: Goodbye debian
> Para: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Data: Quarta-feira, 24 de Junho de 2009, 21:26
>
Goodbye, Mr. Shi.
However, I always received many help from debian users.
--- Em qua, 24/6/09, 明覺 escreveu:
De: 明覺
Assunto: Goodbye debian
Para: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Data: Quarta-feira, 24 de Junho de 2009, 21:26
I do not have time to read your replies about another discussion
anymore
2009/6/24 明覺 :
> I do not have time to read your replies about another discussion
> anymore for they are useless, and I do not feel happy with all you
> debian guys, so I leave this mailing list, also debian has no
> attraction to me anymore, I will stop using it from now.
> As I have decalared, I
--- Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dotan Cohen wrote:
> > On 10/01/2008, Michelle Konzack
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Am 2008-01-08 08:09:58, schrieb Joel Roberts:
> >>> I've gotten a lot of good information from this
> list, and hopefully
> >>> supplied some as well, but I'm
Dotan Cohen wrote:
On 10/01/2008, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am 2008-01-08 08:09:58, schrieb Joel Roberts:
I've gotten a lot of good information from this list, and hopefully
supplied some as well, but I'm not going to weed through hundreds of
spam e-mails weekly to pursue this
On 10/01/2008, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am 2008-01-08 08:09:58, schrieb Joel Roberts:
> > I've gotten a lot of good information from this list, and hopefully
> > supplied some as well, but I'm not going to weed through hundreds of
> > spam e-mails weekly to pursue this any long
Am 2008-01-08 08:09:58, schrieb Joel Roberts:
> I've gotten a lot of good information from this list, and hopefully
> supplied some as well, but I'm not going to weed through hundreds of
> spam e-mails weekly to pursue this any longer. If the list organizers
> can implement some anti-spam measures,
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 04:51:36PM +0100, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 January 2008 16:09, Joel Roberts wrote:
> > I've gotten a lot of good information from this list, and hopefully
> > supplied some as well, but I'm not going to weed through hundreds of
> > spam e-mails weekly to pursu
Yeah... It kind of sounds like "I want attention and to harp on
something that has been done to death..."
On 1/8/08, Mark Fletcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joel Roberts pinkardcc.com> writes:
>
> > I've gotten a lot of good information from this list,
> > and hopefully supplied some as well,
Joel Roberts pinkardcc.com> writes:
> I’ve gotten a lot of good information from this list,
> and hopefully supplied some as well, but I’m not going to weed through
> hundreds
> of spam e-mails weekly to pursue this any longer. If the list organizers can
> implement some anti-spam measures, I’ll
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/08/08 17:23, David wrote:
Joel Roberts wrote:
I’ve gotten a lot of good information from this list, and hopefully
supplied some as well, but I’m not going to weed through hundreds of
spam e-mails weekly to pursue this any longer. If the list organizers
can implement s
On 01/08/08 17:23, David wrote:
Joel Roberts wrote:
I’ve gotten a lot of good information from this list, and hopefully
supplied some as well, but I’m not going to weed through hundreds of
spam e-mails weekly to pursue this any longer. If the list organizers
can implement some anti-spam measur
Joel Roberts wrote:
I’ve gotten a lot of good information from this list, and hopefully
supplied some as well, but I’m not going to weed through hundreds of
spam e-mails weekly to pursue this any longer. If the list organizers
can implement some anti-spam measures, I’ll be happy to join again i
Ok, goodbye!
Don't forget to write.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thierry Chatelet escribió:
On Tuesday 08 January 2008 16:09, Joel Roberts wrote:
I've gotten a lot of good information from this list, and hopefully
supplied some as well, but I'm not going to weed through hundreds of
spam e-mails weekly to pursue this any longer. If the list organizers
can i
No, it hasn't. I've continued getting them right up until I sent the
unsubscribe message.
From: Chris Howie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 8:41 AM
To: Joel Roberts
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Goodbye
On Tuesday 08 January 2008 16:09, Joel Roberts wrote:
> I've gotten a lot of good information from this list, and hopefully
> supplied some as well, but I'm not going to weed through hundreds of
> spam e-mails weekly to pursue this any longer. If the list organizers
> can implement some anti-spam m
On Jan 8, 2008 10:45 AM, Joel Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, it hasn't. I've continued getting them right up until I sent the
> unsubscribe message.
>
About 20 minutes ago this was posted:
http://cord.de/blog/index.php?entry=entry080108-144308
--
Chris Howie
http://www.chrishowie.co
On Jan 8, 2008 10:09 AM, Joel Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've gotten a lot of good information from this list, and hopefully
> supplied some as well, but I'm not going to weed through hundreds of spam
> e-mails weekly to pursue this any longer. If the list organizers can
> implement som
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
Robert Millan wrote:
[ Please CC me in your reply ]
Do you see any error before getting to grub prompt?
I think there is some error before the grub prompt appears. However, it goes
by so fast that I do not know what the error is or if it is in fact an
Robert Millan wrote:
>
> [ Please CC me in your reply ]
>
> Do you see any error before getting to grub prompt?
>
I think there is some error before the grub prompt appears. However, it goes
by so fast that I do not know what the error is or if it is in fact an
error in the first place.
> W
[ Please CC me in your reply ]
Do you see any error before getting to grub prompt?
Which version of Windows were you using?
--
Robert Millan
My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended
for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list.
--
To
On Friday 06 July 2007 12:17 pm, you wrote:
> On 06/07/07, Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I tried to install Debian from windows by going to
> > http://goodbye-microsoft.com/ . After rebooting the computer and
> > selecting the debian installer, I was placed at the grub prompt.
Considering I started using debian (and linux) with bo on a 486 with no
previous linux/unix experience, (has it really been that long ago ;-) I
am quite happy with the woody installer doing a minimal install and then
dist-upgrading to unstable.
I am planning to try the new installer in a couple of
hi,
dist-upgrade to sarge or unstable. I run unstable and find it more
stable than other 'stable' dists.
Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
Hello,
I just discovered the recent increase of the numer of release-critical bugs
and was shocked. The RCB diagramm seems to suggest that sarge will hardly
ever b
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 06:10:52PM +0200, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 28. M?rz 2004 19:04 schrieben Sie:
> > [...]
>
> > You don't really run workstations directly on the internet do you?
>
> I do.
>
> > You might consider getting yourself some kind of hardware based
> > firewall/NAT b
Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
Am Sonntag, 28. MÃrz 2004 19:07 schrieb Colin Watson:
[...]
I fear that sarge is too unstable for my daily work, and I've heard really
bad things about debian-installer.
You should test it for yourself and send reports, please, rather than
going on really bad things you h
On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:07:02 +0100
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > KDE I use is a backported one and it runs quit stable, too. I fear
> > that sarge is too unstable for my daily work, and I've heard really
Fear not. I've been using sarge since 3.0 came out and have never had
stabili
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 08:45:52PM +0200, Micha Feigin wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 05:45:29PM +0200, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> > What about security? I'm online all the time my computer is on. Are the
> > sarge versions of iptables and ssh stable enough to give me good security?
> > If yo
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 04:46:27PM +0200, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just discovered the recent increase of the numer of release-critical bugs
> and was shocked. The RCB diagramm seems to suggest that sarge will hardly
> ever be released as stable.
>
> I'm asking myself what the im
Am Sonntag, 28. März 2004 20:45 schrieb Micha Feigin:
> [...]
> > What about security? I'm online all the time my computer is on. Are the
> > sarge versions of iptables and ssh stable enough to give me good
> > security? If you have a non-Debian distribution, you may get quick
> > security updat
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 05:45:29PM +0200, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 28. M?rz 2004 18:32 schrieb Jody Grafals:
> > I think for the most part many running debian on the desktop are already
> > using sarge or sid, and I must say I am run several servers with woody,
> > I like it just the w
Wolfgang Jeltsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Were the gaps between releases ever so large as the gap between woody and
> sarge?
Wikipedia says that the distance between Potato and Woody was somewhat
similar:
3.1* -- sarge, expected in 2004
3.0 -- woody, July 19th, 2002
2.2 -- potato, Augu
Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
Were the gaps between releases ever so large as the gap between woody and
sarge?
Alexis
Wolfgang
Potato=8/14/2000, Woody=7/19/2002: Debian has three more months before
it matches the last gap...
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Wolfgang Jeltsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Sonntag, 28. März 2004 19:06 schrieb Colin Watson:
>> [...]
>
>> The release team is likely to remove unimportant packages with
>> release-critical bugs once the installer is ready.
>
> When is the installer expected to be ready?
Real Soon Now...w
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
