Re: FW: IMAP + QMAIL

2000-06-14 Thread Jens B. Jorgensen
; http://www.nc.edu > > -Original Message- > From: Jens B. Jorgensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 11:00 AM > To: Wesley A. Wannemacher > Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: FW: IMAP + QMAIL > > That's a strong possibili

RE: FW: IMAP + QMAIL

2000-06-13 Thread Wesley A. Wannemacher
http://www.nc.edu -Original Message- From: Jens B. Jorgensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 11:00 AM To: Wesley A. Wannemacher Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: FW: IMAP + QMAIL That's a strong possibility. If you're using shadow and WU use

Re: FW: IMAP + QMAIL

2000-06-13 Thread Jens B. Jorgensen
That's a strong possibility. If you're using shadow and WU uses getpwnam rather than getspnam, it won't get the password and won't be able to authenticate. Does WU IMAP support PAM authentication? That would make your life easier if it can be built with PAM support since then the actual authenti