On 2011-07-02 19:38 +0200, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> What I would love is to have all the true configuration files checked
> into a revision management system (such as monotone). There would be a
> vendor branch, various changes performed during installation, and finally
> any changes made by the s
On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 09:44:41 +0200, alberto fuentes wrote:
> This would be handy to checkout messed up systems to be able to tell
> apart easily whats has been touched.
>
> Is there already something that makes this?
>
> The easier way it comes to mind is to dpkg --get-selections,
> debootstrap,
On 07/01/11 at 08:50pm, alberto fuentes wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 8:03 PM, William Hopkins wrote:
>
> > On 07/01/11 at 09:44am, alberto fuentes wrote:
> > > This would be handy to checkout messed up systems to be able to tell
> > apart
> > > easily whats has been touched.
> > >
> > > Is ther
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 8:03 PM, William Hopkins wrote:
> On 07/01/11 at 09:44am, alberto fuentes wrote:
> > This would be handy to checkout messed up systems to be able to tell
> apart
> > easily whats has been touched.
> >
> > Is there already something that makes this?
>
> comparing dpkg --get-s
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Peter Wiersig <
fri...@london087.server4you.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 09:44:41 +0200, alberto fuentes
> wrote:
> >
> > The easier way it comes to mind is to dpkg --get-selections, debootstrap,
> > chroot and install the selection and then make the diff.
>
> d
On 07/01/11 at 09:44am, alberto fuentes wrote:
> This would be handy to checkout messed up systems to be able to tell apart
> easily whats has been touched.
>
> Is there already something that makes this?
comparing dpkg --get-selections before and after is an easy way to see what new
packages hav
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 09:44:41 +0200, alberto fuentes wrote:
>
> The easier way it comes to mind is to dpkg --get-selections, debootstrap,
> chroot and install the selection and then make the diff.
dpkg-repack and the debdiff command from the package devscripts?
Perter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
John Hasler wrote:
> Ron Johnson writes:
>> Then that should be:
>
>> $ patch --gen-diff
>
>> $ patch --apply-diff
>
> The diff command predates the patch command by many years (it was in
> System III) and does far more than generate files suitable for application
> by patch, which was written
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:52:47 -0500
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 09/10/08 22:22, Celejar wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:41:01 -0500
...
> (If you ever wonder why so many conservatives in the US dislike the
> UN [besides the rampant corruption] and the EU, it's because they
> [
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 23:10:15 +0200, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James A. Donald wrote:
>
> > Can I get file changes recorded in git to display the
> > way they do in windows?
>
> I am surprised that no one has told this till now.
>
> The main purpose of diff is to generat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thveillon.debian wrote:
> Johannes Wiedersich a écrit :
>> On 2008-09-10 13:31, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>> I am sorry for having accidentally sent that OT message to list.
>>
>> Does anyone know, if there is a way of fixing the missing
> If all rights descend from the government (whether that be an absolute
> monarchy or a parliament), then I'd posit that no, you don't have a right to
> defend home and hearth.
That doesn't follow.
If rights descend from the government, then you have a right to defend
home and hearth if the gover
Ron Johnson wrote:
> This works for me:
> http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson/replytolist-0.2.1.xpi
>
> v0.3.0 fails, since I use IMAP.
>
> I think that you need to install the Mnenhy add-on.
Yes, downgrading to 0.2.1 works for me also. I don't think Icedove needs Mnenhy
(but stock Thunderbird
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 09/11/08 12:19, Jeff Soules wrote:
>> Dismissing most of this because it's little more than an expression of
>> the author's prejudice, but...
>>
>>> We don't like the EU because
>>> of their complete disregard for individual rights. It was conceived
>>> of and
>>> implement
On 09/11/08 12:19, Jeff Soules wrote:
Dismissing most of this because it's little more than an expression of
the author's prejudice, but...
We don't like the EU because
of their complete disregard for individual rights. It was conceived of and
implemented by socialists. It's that simple.
Soci
Dismissing most of this because it's little more than an expression of
the author's prejudice, but...
> We don't like the EU because
> of their complete disregard for individual rights. It was conceived of and
> implemented by socialists. It's that simple.
Socialists?
You mean the kind of people
On 2008-Sep-11, at 5:08 AM, Tim Edwards wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
(If you ever wonder why so many conservatives in the US dislike the
UN [besides the rampant corruption] and the EU, it's because they
[the UN and the EU...] spew lots of pretty words, but don't have
the testicles to enforce
On 09/11/08 02:53, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
On 2008-09-11 09:41, thveillon.debian wrote:
I have "reply to mailing list 0.3.1" and it works ok with Icedove here.
https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/thunderbird/addon/4455
It is considered "experimental" on Mozilla website I just noticed, but
never h
On 2008-09-11 09:41, thveillon.debian wrote:
> I have "reply to mailing list 0.3.1" and it works ok with Icedove here.
>
> https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/thunderbird/addon/4455
>
> It is considered "experimental" on Mozilla website I just noticed, but
> never had a problem with it.
Thanks! It wor
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:08:40AM +0200, Tim Edwards wrote:
> ..., or Australia armed with nuclear powered Kangaroos
> and sharks with laser beams :) (we could do it you know - don't try and
> stop us!)
I thought the Kiwis did all the development stuff
Dave
--
... (I tried to get
Ron Johnson wrote:
(If you ever wonder why so many conservatives in the US dislike the UN
[besides the rampant corruption] and the EU, it's because they [the UN
and the EU...] spew lots of pretty words, but don't have the testicles
to enforce them.)
In the UN's case it was specifically des
On 2008-09-11 09:41, thveillon.debian wrote:
> I have "reply to mailing list 0.3.1" and it works ok with Icedove here.
>
> https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/thunderbird/addon/4455
>
> It is considered "experimental" on Mozilla website I just noticed, but
> never had a problem with it.
Thanks. It doe
Johannes Wiedersich a écrit :
On 2008-09-10 13:31, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
[snip]
I am sorry for having accidentally sent that OT message to list.
Does anyone know, if there is a way of fixing the missing
'reply-to-list' functionally of icedove for lenny?
Since the extension doesn't work an
On 2008-09-10 13:31, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
[snip]
I am sorry for having accidentally sent that OT message to list.
Does anyone know, if there is a way of fixing the missing
'reply-to-list' functionally of icedove for lenny?
Since the extension doesn't work any more, I acquired the habit of
On 09/10/08 18:49, John Hasler wrote:
Ron Johnson writes:
Then that should be:
$ patch --gen-diff
$ patch --apply-diff
The diff command predates the patch command by many years (it was in System
III) and does far more than generate files suitable for application by
patch, which was writt
On 09/10/08 22:17, Celejar wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:31:51 +0200
Johannes Wiedersich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2008-09-10 09:52, James A. Donald wrote:
We have the right to defend ourselves and our property, because
of the kind of animals that we are. True law derives from this
right,
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:52:47AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> There was a time when he commanded a huge army...
Not just (a) huge army, but LOTS of huge armies. He commanded kings.
Regards,
Dave
--
Thasai, Ampoe Meuang | Linux - Das System fuer schlaue
Nonthaburi |
On 09/10/08 22:22, Celejar wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:41:01 -0500
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
The one place where I might disagree with the Declaration of
Independence is where Rights come from, since I want to think that
rights come from the barrel of a gun.
You do?
>
Or
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:41:01 -0500
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> The one place where I might disagree with the Declaration of
> Independence is where Rights come from, since I want to think that
> rights come from the barrel of a gun.
You do?
> Or, maybe, that those unalienable
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:31:51 +0200
Johannes Wiedersich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-09-10 09:52, James A. Donald wrote:
> > We have the right to defend ourselves and our property, because
> > of the kind of animals that we are. True law derives from this
> > right, not from the arbitrary
Ron Johnson writes:
> Then that should be:
> $ patch --gen-diff
> $ patch --apply-diff
The diff command predates the patch command by many years (it was in System
III) and does far more than generate files suitable for application by
patch, which was written by Larry Wall in 1984.
--
John Hasle
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 09/10/08 18:28, gary turner wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 09/10/08 16:03, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
The main purpose of diff is to generate a patch which can then be
used to
apply/revert changes across two versions of a file.
That would sanely be called "patch", no
On 09/10/08 18:28, gary turner wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 09/10/08 16:03, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
The main purpose of diff is to generate a patch which can then be
used to
apply/revert changes across two versions of a file.
That would sanely be called "patch", not "diff".
See man
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 09/10/08 16:03, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
The main purpose of diff is to generate a patch which can then be used to
apply/revert changes across two versions of a file.
That would sanely be called "patch", not "diff".
See man patch. diff consists of differences betw
On 09/10/08 16:03, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
James A. Donald wrote:
Can I get file changes recorded in git to display the
way they do in windows?
I am surprised that no one has told this till now.
The main purpose of diff is to generate a patch which can then be used to
apply/revert chang
James A. Donald wrote:
> Can I get file changes recorded in git to display the
> way they do in windows?
I am surprised that no one has told this till now.
The main purpose of diff is to generate a patch which can then be used to
apply/revert changes across two versions of a file. The output pro
On 09/10/08 09:39, Rob McBroom wrote:
On 2008-Sep-10, at 7:31 AM, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
On 2008-09-10 09:52, James A. Donald wrote:
We have the right to defend ourselves and our property, because
of the kind of animals that we are. True law derives from this
right, not from the arbitrary
On 2008-Sep-10, at 7:31 AM, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
On 2008-09-10 09:52, James A. Donald wrote:
We have the right to defend ourselves and our property, because
of the kind of animals that we are. True law derives from this
right, not from the arbitrary power of the omnipotent state.
http://
On 2008-09-10 09:52, James A. Donald wrote:
> We have the right to defend ourselves and our property, because
> of the kind of animals that we are. True law derives from this
> right, not from the arbitrary power of the omnipotent state.
>
> http://www.jim.com/ James A. Donald
I am happy t
On 2008-09-10 11:18, Johann Spies wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 05:52:49PM +1000, James A. Donald wrote:
>
>> Can I get file changes recorded in git to display the
>> way they do in windows?
>
> You can also look ast colordiff
> (http://freshmeat.net/projects/colordiff/). I have not used it
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 05:52:49PM +1000, James A. Donald wrote:
> Can I get file changes recorded in git to display the
> way they do in windows?
You can also look ast colordiff
(http://freshmeat.net/projects/colordiff/). I have not used it though.
Regards
Johann
--
Johann Spies Te
On 09/10/08 04:04, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
On 2008-09-10 09:52, James A. Donald wrote:
[snip]
Can I get file changes recorded in git to display the
way they do in windows?
If you insist that things in linux should be just like in windows, why
bother using linux?
And he uses "in windo
On 2008-09-10 09:52, James A. Donald wrote:
> Under windows, diff usually works like windiff - you see
> the two versions side by side, with the differences
> highlighted by color
>
> git-gui, however gives me a diff where I see a single
> stream annotated with + and -
>
> I find the single strea
Le Mer 10 septembre 2008 09:52, James A. Donald a écrit :
[...]
> Can I get file changes recorded in git to display the
> way they do in windows?
I use Mercurial instead of GIT, but it is very close. I use it under Unix
(Solaris and Linux) and Windows. And I use KDiff3 under Unix and Windows
too.
On Wed,10.Sep.08, 17:52:49, James A. Donald wrote:
[...]
> Can I get file changes recorded in git to display the way they do in
> windows?
I'm almost sure it can be done by combining git with a tool like vimdiff
(vim actually, but I'm sure emacs has something similar).
Regards,
Andrei
--
I recommend meld package
See you later !
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:52 AM, James A. Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Under windows, diff usually works like windiff - you see
> the two versions side by side, with the differences
> highlighted by color
>
> git-gui, however gives me a diff where
On 3/10/08, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have an Asus EN7300GT silent that uses the nVidia chipset.
>
> Where possible, I try to go with free drivers. I had noticed a
> picture-quality improvment when watching DVDs if I use the
> debian-packaged nVidia driver. I no
Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote:
> Mark Neidorff wrote:
>> Excuse me. I don't want to appear rude, but are you a student at Cornell
>> and are we doing your CS homework for you?
>
> Excuse me. I don't want to appear rude, but you could have foud it out
> yourself had you bothered to visit the OP's webpa
Mark Neidorff wrote:
> Excuse me. I don't want to appear rude, but are you a student at Cornell
> and are we doing your CS homework for you?
>
No offense taken...
First, I would love to find a course here at Cornell (or online for that
matter) which gives problems such as this for homework! If
Mark Neidorff wrote:
Excuse me. I don't want to appear rude, but are you a student at Cornell and
are we doing your CS homework for you?
Excuse me. I don't want to appear rude, but you could have foud it out
yourself had you bothered to visit the OP's webpage/blog mentioned in
his signature.
Excuse me. I don't want to appear rude, but are you a student at Cornell and
are we doing your CS homework for you?
On Sunday 24 February 2008 02:21 pm, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> Let's say I have two directories dir1, dir2 each with 1000 files.
> Of these 1000 files in each directory, there
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 01:12:09PM -0500, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> Richard Lyons wrote:
>
> >> Damn the shell! Did not even think about this. Thanks Rajki.
> >
> > You should have read _my_ solution on sunday. There was a note about
> > this in the comments at the top.
> >
>
> You are
Richard Lyons wrote:
>> Damn the shell! Did not even think about this. Thanks Rajki.
>
> You should have read _my_ solution on sunday. There was a note about
> this in the comments at the top.
>
You are right, I should've. Thanks for the script, Richard. I basically
looked at Raj Kiran's scr
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:50:57AM -0500, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote:
>
> > The pattern should be in quotes, so that the shell does not expand it
> > and it gets passed to your script.
> >
> > So it should be
> > $patlist "file*"
> >
>
> Damn the shell! Did not even
Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote:
> The pattern should be in quotes, so that the shell does not expand it
> and it gets passed to your script.
>
> So it should be
> $patlist "file*"
>
Damn the shell! Did not even think about this. Thanks Rajki.
raju
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
I must be doing something wrong here. Consider this reduced problem. I tried
to write a script to list all the files matching a specific pattern.
Consider
$cat ~/bin/patlist
#! /bin/sh
# to list all the files matching a given pattern
# call as patlist
pattern="$1"
Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote:
> #call as script-name dir1 dir2
> pattern="$1"
> dir1="$2"
> dir2="$3"
> for file in $dir1/$pattern; do
> diff $file dir2${file##${dir1}}
> done
>
I must be doing something wrong here. Consider this reduced problem. I tried
to write a script to list all the files
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
for i in `seq 1 50`; do diff dir1/file$i.txt dir2/file$i.txt >
diff$i.txt ; done
Ok, this works on the command line. But I am looking for something along the
lines of
bash_script_name dir1/pattern1 dir2/pattern2
where dir1/pattern1,
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 03:12:34PM -0500, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> >
> > LC_ALL=C diff -r dir1 dir2 | grep -v ^Only
> >
> > The size really doesn't matter for those extra large files.
> >
>
> This works only if the extra 950 files are in just one directory. If the
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 03:12:34PM -0500, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> >
> > LC_ALL=C diff -r dir1 dir2 | grep -v ^Only
> >
> > The size really doesn't matter for those extra large files.
> >
>
> This works only if the extra 950 files are in just one directory. If the
>
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>
> LC_ALL=C diff -r dir1 dir2 | grep -v ^Only
>
> The size really doesn't matter for those extra large files.
>
This works only if the extra 950 files are in just one directory. If the
extra files are there in both the directories, then it does not make sense
to compare al
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 02:21:56PM -0500, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> Let's say I have two directories dir1, dir2 each with 1000 files.
> Of these 1000 files in each directory, there are 50 files named file1.txt,
> file2.txt ... file50.txt. The rest of the files do not follow any pattern
> and a
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 02:21:56PM -0500, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> Let's say I have two directories dir1, dir2 each with 1000 files.
> Of these 1000 files in each directory, there are 50 files named file1.txt,
> file2.txt ... file50.txt. The rest of the files do not follow any pattern
> and
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
>>
>> Manually diffing the files 50 times is cumbersome. Something like
>>
>> diff dir1/file*.txt dir2/file*.txt
>>
>> is what I am after. I do not want to do
>>
>> diff -r dir1 dir2
>>
>> since that compares the other 950 files as well besides the 50 files that
>> I wa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
[...]
>> Manually diffing the files 50 times is cumbersome. Something like
>>
>> diff dir1/file*.txt dir2/file*.txt
>>
>> is what I am after. I do not want to do
>>
>> diff -r dir1 dir2
[...]
>
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let's say I have two directories dir1, dir2 each with 1000 files.
> Of these 1000 files in each directory, there are 50 files named file1.txt,
> file2.txt ... file50.txt. The rest of the files do not follow any pa
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
Let's say I have two directories dir1, dir2 each with 1000 files.
Of these 1000 files in each directory, there are 50 files named file1.txt,
file2.txt ... file50.txt. The rest of the files do not follow any pattern
and are very large in size.
Now is there any way to
On Saturday December 22 2007 13:32:32 Bogart Salzberg wrote:
> On Dec 22, 2007, at 2:16 PM, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
> >
> > Ron Johnson wrote:
> >> On Saturday December 22 2007 10:11:48 Sven Hoexter wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 04:45:25PM +0100, abdelkader
> >>> belahcene
> >>
> >>
On Saturday 22 Dec 2007, abdelkader belahcene wrote:
> HI,
> I have an AMD laptop,
> I downoloaded ia64 iso image , I thought it is the same,
> I can't boot with the CD;
> what is the difference between them?
> best regards
> bela
ia64 is the itanium processor
amd64 covers the 64bit intel and a
On Dec 22, 2007, at 2:16 PM, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Saturday December 22 2007 10:11:48 Sven Hoexter wrote:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 04:45:25PM +0100, abdelkader belahcene
wrote:
HI,
I have an AMD laptop,
I downol
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Saturday December 22 2007 10:11:48 Sven Hoexter wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 04:45:25PM +0100, abdelkader belahcene
> wrote:
>>> HI,
>>> I have an AMD laptop,
>>> I downoloaded ia64 iso image , I thought it is the same,
On Saturday December 22 2007 10:11:48 Sven Hoexter wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 04:45:25PM +0100, abdelkader belahcene
wrote:
> > HI,
> > I have an AMD laptop,
> > I downoloaded ia64 iso image , I thought it is the same,
> > I can't boot with the CD;
> > what is the difference between them?
Just to announce, amd64 (x86_64) is used both on AMD's (Athlon/Opteron) and
Intel's (Pentium D/Core/Core 2 Duo...) CPUs.
So you need to download amd64 version anyway.
On Dec 22, 2007 5:11 PM, Sven Hoexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 04:45:25PM +0100, abdelkader belahcene
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 04:45:25PM +0100, abdelkader belahcene wrote:
> HI,
> I have an AMD laptop,
> I downoloaded ia64 iso image , I thought it is the same,
> I can't boot with the CD;
> what is the difference between them?
It's a different architecture.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IA64
http:
Heh, I had the same 'prob' :)
IA64 is Intel's 64bit technology for Itanium server architecture (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IA-64)
you need amd64 version for your notebook.
On Dec 22, 2007 4:45 PM, abdelkader belahcene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> HI,
> I have an AMD laptop,
> I downoloaded
Le samedi 14 avril 2007 00:22, Greg Folkert a écrit :
> On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 17:41 -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > I've just been busy installing Xen, and noticed that there are two
> > different kernels available for the 686:
> >
> > xen-linux-system-2.6.18-4-xen-686
> > and
>
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 17:41 -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I've just been busy installing Xen, and noticed that there are two
> different kernels available for the 686:
>
> xen-linux-system-2.6.18-4-xen-686
> and
> xen-linux-system-2.6.18-4-xen-vserver-686
>
> Both described as "X
Hi Folks,
I've just been busy installing Xen, and noticed that there are two
different kernels available for the 686:
xen-linux-system-2.6.18-4-xen-686
and
xen-linux-system-2.6.18-4-xen-vserver-686
Both described as "XEN system with Linux 2.6.18 image on i686."
which seem to depend on
linux
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 01:45:39 +0200, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
> Something "differential" has been introduced: "apt-get update" downloads
> some kind of patches whose name contains date.
> Would you please indicate me a link that explain the change that have
> been made?
http://xpt.sourceforg
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:18:32AM +0200, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
> I'am back now, and I see the way apt repo are dona is sloghtly
> different.
> Something "differential" has been introduced: "apt-get update" downloads
> some kind of patches whose name contains date.
> Would you please ind
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:45:39AM +0200, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
> Hi,
> Six month ago, I used testing, and used to learn packaging for Debian on
> a testing box.
> I have been out for some mounths.
> I'am back now, and I see the way apt repo are dona is sloghtly
> different.
> Something "d
roberto wrote:
> Hi all,
> i know two different packages (among others) are downloadable for math
> computing:
> octave and octave-forge
>
> i have installed and currently using octave 2.1.69 but what are the
> differences with octave-forge??
> can i install octave-forge without conflict with octa
roberto wrote:
Hi all,
i know two different packages (among others) are downloadable for math
computing:
octave and octave-forge
i have installed and currently using octave 2.1.69 but what are the
differences with octave-forge??
can i install octave-forge without conflict with octave 2.1? (apti
From: Ron Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Subject: Re: Diff btw GeForce4 and RIVA TNT2?
>> Quod erat demonstrandum!
>The nvidia-using-TNT2 will *smoke* the
nv-using-GeForce4.
Unfortunately with Backstreet Ruby I cannot mix nvidia
and nv, so both the figures are with nvidia.
Unfortunatel
On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 08:59, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Thanks for those answers!
>
> So... apt-getted xscreensaver-gl. gears -fps -delay 0
> indeed is the most straightforward app. to show the
> difference.
>
> Left monitor, with the GeForce4: 155 fps.
> Right monitor, with RIVA TNT2:
Hi all!
Thanks for those answers!
So... apt-getted xscreensaver-gl. gears -fps -delay 0
indeed is the most straightforward app. to show the
difference.
Left monitor, with the GeForce4: 155 fps.
Right monitor, with RIVA TNT2: 50 fps.
Quod erat demonstrandum!
Hugo
_
On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 12:42, David Z Maze wrote:
> Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The monitors are samsungs 17" but the cards are
> > different: one is a RIVA TNT2 Model 64/Model 64 and
> > the other a GeForce4 MX 440 AGP 8x.
> >
> > I notice no difference between the 2 other th
Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The monitors are samsungs 17" but the cards are
> different: one is a RIVA TNT2 Model 64/Model 64 and
> the other a GeForce4 MX 440 AGP 8x.
>
> I notice no difference between the 2 other than that I
> paid $25 more for the MX440.
The last time I boug
On Wednesday 01 October 2003 17:00, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I have Backstreet Ruby installed so I have 2 monitors
> with kbds/mice that each have a user.
>
> The monitors are samsungs 17" but the cards are
> different: one is a RIVA TNT2 Model 64/Model 64 and
> the other a GeForce4 MX
Hi,
Micha Feigin wrote:
> Currently I am trying to build the diff for the source trio
> (orig.tar.gz/diff.gz/.dsc). The problem is that using the standard diff
> arguments diff -ruN doesn't work. dpkg-source -x returns an error for
> the diff line (the first one in the file) and for the file dates
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 08:35:11PM +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
> I am trying to build my own version of a package and I am trying to
> reuse the existing package files since I don't know how to create them
> myself.
> Currently I am trying to build the diff for the source trio
> (orig.tar.gz/diff.gz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Now I'm faced with my utter ignorance. I have a couple linux boxes, but
> this is my first crack at debian. There are some patches that let my use
> various hardware features (eg touch screen), but they come in the form of
> .diff files. I haven'
Joris Lambrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>OR, does anybody know why a newer compiler would say that it cannot find
>/usr/ld : -ldb
>when compiling/installing Galeon and other software ?
Because you haven't got libdb2-dev installed, perhaps? That gives you
/usr/lib/libdb.so, among other thin
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Suresh Kumar. R wrote:
> Can different users select different window managers if it is mentioned
> in the /etc/X11/window-managers file.?
1. In potato, /etc/X11/window-managers is obsolete. Use
update-alternatives --config x-window-manager
instead to select the d
Quoting Colin Marquardt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> The test case I just set up worked! I don´t know what was
> different... Maybe the error really was between keyboard and chair,
> and I´ve now gotten the brown paper bag award :-( I don´t know.
>
> Thanks for taking the time to answer,
That's OK
Hi,
* David Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Quoting Colin Marquardt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> apparently diff caches stuff in memory.
> I'm not sure what you mean by "made a new clean version".
> (I'm sure you know that -N means any empty files that were
> cleaned away will have no effect on
I too doubt this is directly related to diff (but I could be wrong). Is
the clean_dir by chance on a network share? I did have a similar problem
with a Samba share. If someone logged onto the Samba machine and modified
a file, then a Windows machine on the network would not detect that the
file
Quoting Colin Marquardt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> apparently diff caches stuff in memory.
That seems unlikely. I thought linux did that itself.
> I noticed that when I wanted to make a patch with
>
>diff -urN clean_dir patched_dir > my_patch
>
> The patch came out fine, but then I realized th
> I had to hack the vnc* source code (for it to use more displays
> than it was...). Now, I am trying to "diff" the old one with the new one,
> but I would like diff's output to be like debian's diffs. Is there any
> standard to diff files when you are making *.deb packages?
I think the best
On Mon, Mar 01, 1999 at 17:57:32 -0300, Daniel Doro Ferrante wrote:
> I had to hack the vnc* source code (for it to use more displays than it
> was...). Now, I am trying to "diff" the old one with the new one, but I
> would like diff's output to be like debian's diffs. Is there any standard
> to di
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
