On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 12:41:23PM -0600, Dave Sherohman wrote:
>
> I was unclear in my question... I'm definitely planning to do a read-only
> export from the server. My concern is with how apt will behave if/when run
> on the workstations, where /usr will be forced to be ro by the ro export.
>
UNSUBSCRIBE ME PLEASE!!
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Eric G. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviado el: jueves, 15 de marzo de 2001 17:52
> Para: Debian-User
> CC: Dave Sherohman
> Asunto: Re: Debian with read-only /usr
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 200
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 10:22:47AM -0600, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> I'm looking at NFS-mounting /usr for a largish number of machines, with the
> basic idea that then I can just keep the binaries on the central server up-to
> date and the workstations will all follow along with (hopefully) a minimum
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 11:07:27AM -0600, Carl Greco wrote:
> You could always mount the `/usr' filesystem on the server as readonly
> and use the `remount' option of `mount' to remount `/usr' as writeable
> during an apt upgrade. The other option would be to export `/usr'
> readonly, i.e., in the
At 10:22 AM 3/15/01 , you wrote:
I'm looking at NFS-mounting /usr for a largish number of machines, with the
basic idea that then I can just keep the binaries on the central server up-to
date and the workstations will all follow along with (hopefully) a minimum of
effort. I'm a little concerned
Dave -
You could always mount the `/usr' filesystem on the server as readonly
and use the `remount' option of `mount' to remount `/usr' as writeable
during an apt upgrade. The other option would be to export `/usr'
readonly, i.e., in the `/etc/exports' on the server.
Dave Sherohman said on March
6 matches
Mail list logo
