On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 01:23:16AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
| also sprach dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.09.0118 +0100]:
| > (I can't filter on IPs anyways since 99.99% of my mail comes out of
| > pony-express.cs.rit.edu due to my .forward file there, if you use
| > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" it
also sprach dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.09.0118 +0100]:
> What does it take to setup an RBL domain? My guess is that you just
> need a DNS server.
pretty much. to RBL an IP 1.2.3.4, you create two entries in a zone, say
rbl.madduck.net (which happens to be one btw...)
4.3.2.1 IN A 127.0.0.
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 12:40:06AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
| also sprach Karsten M. Self [2002.01.07.2215 +0100]:
| > ...how would one do this via procmail, filtering on 'Recieved'
| > lines? Anything from this domain should be forwarded to a spam
| > complain addresses and shitcanned.
|
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 08:27:13PM -0800, Paul E Condon wrote:
> Where is there a HOWTO or tutorial on using available tools (e.g. procmail) to
> filter spam? Is it something that the "unwashed masses" like myself can learn
> to do?
I am also just about to invest time in procmail
send an email
also sprach nori heikkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.08.0235 +0100]:
> > you are doing apt-get upgrade and it tries to upgrade to woody.
>
> no, i'm not. i'm doing apt-get upDATE and then apt-get install ...
> it's not like it tries to remove the old gimp, and then install the
> new one, or l
on Tue, 08 Jan 2002 12:33:55AM +0100, marTin insinuated:
> that's the problem with apt in potato, it can't pin. do you still
> have that debian.madduck.net line in /etc/apt/source.list? i could
> offer a kernel update and the package compiled and ready for
> potato...
yup, still there. that could
also sprach Karsten M. Self [2002.01.07.2215 +0100]:
> $ nmap -sL 216.242.0-255.0-255
i think i'd prefer 216.242.0.0/16 ...
> ...how would one do this via procmail, filtering on 'Recieved' lines?
> Anything from this domain should be forwarded to a spam complain
> addresses and shitcanned.
also sprach nori heikkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.07.2205 +0100]:
> > so if you really want to install it,
>
> yes, i do; that's why i wrote to the list.
you have an irrefutable point, turkey!
> > then comment your potato/stable entries in /etc/apt/sources.list and
> > provide similar one
on Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 12:05:32PM -0500, dman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 09:20:12AM -0500, Jens Gecius wrote:
> | dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | > On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 08:27:13PM -0800, Paul E Condon wrote:
> | > | Where is there a HOWTO or tutorial on using
on Sun, 06 Jan 2002 03:27:32PM +0100, marTin insinuated:
> apt-get in potato can't handle multiple distributions.
that would explain it.
> first of all, you'd need entries for potato and sid in
> /etc/apt/sources.list (which i don't think you have since *i* didn't
> put them there),
right, wel
also sprach Brian Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.07.1541 +0100]:
> Except for this morning I woke to see a hundred emails filtered into my
> spam folder by spamassasin after it was upgraded via apt yesterday.
> Email from lists, people I know aren't in relays, etc.
damn, and i *just* upgraded.
* martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 07. 2002 04:16]:
> spamassassin is quite nice and *s* easy...
Except for this morning I woke to see a hundred emails filtered into my
spam folder by spamassasin after it was upgraded via apt yesterday.
Email from lists, people I know aren't in relays
also sprach dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.07.0605 +0100]:
> No, you have only DoS'd yourself. The config I posted only checks the
> blacklist of the local user the message is addressed to, not all
> local users' blacklists.
very cool. exim is moving up the list!
> One of these days I'll look
MH wrote:
> > "Nori" == Nori Heikkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [...]
>
> Nori> from http://spamassassin.taint.org/dist/README: " On Debian,
> Nori> you can apt-get it from unstable, thanks to Duncan Findlay."
>
> Nori> debian confirms this at
> Nori> http://packages.debia
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 11:32:54PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
| also sprach dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.06.2015 +0100]:
| > > the exim setup proposed it surely interesting as it allows SMTP
| > > level filtering, but you can only really do this on a single-user
| > > system. after some exp
also sprach dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.06.2015 +0100]:
> > the exim setup proposed it surely interesting as it allows SMTP
> > level filtering, but you can only really do this on a single-user
> > system. after some experience with anti-spam filtering, i have
> > decided that system-wide fil
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 04:54:46PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
| also sprach Jens Gecius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.06.1520 +0100]:
| > OK, so, could you post your scripts? That might be very helpful for
| > others.
| >
| > Another question: you check in exim if that sender is a spam-address.
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 09:20:12AM -0500, Jens Gecius wrote:
| dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| > On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 08:27:13PM -0800, Paul E Condon wrote:
| > | Where is there a HOWTO or tutorial on using available tools (e.g.
| > | procmail) to filter spam? Is it something that the "unw
also sprach Jens Gecius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.06.1520 +0100]:
> OK, so, could you post your scripts? That might be very helpful for
> others.
>
> Another question: you check in exim if that sender is a spam-address.
> How exactly does that work? Do you just check the headers and then
> deny
Nori Heikkinen([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> on Sat, 05 Jan 2002 10:07:43PM -0600, Nori Heikkinen insinuated:
> > RTFM:
> > man procmail
> > http://spamassassin.taint.org/
> > http://spamassassin.taint.org/dist/README
>
> so of course, having written this, and having rtfm'ed myse
dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 08:27:13PM -0800, Paul E Condon wrote:
> | Where is there a HOWTO or tutorial on using available tools (e.g.
> | procmail) to filter spam? Is it something that the "unwashed masses"
> | like myself can learn to do?
>
> If you would like, I
Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> orange:~# apt-get install spamassassin/unstable
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> E: Couldn't find package spamassassin/unstable
>
> ? am i doing it wrong? (currently running potato)
Well potato's apt does not support that syntax, or pi
Thus spake Nori Heikkinen:
> on Sat, 05 Jan 2002 10:07:43PM -0600, Nori Heikkinen insinuated:
> > RTFM:
> > man procmail
> > http://spamassassin.taint.org/
> > http://spamassassin.taint.org/dist/README
>
> so of course, having written this, and having rtfm'ed myself, now i
> have a question ...
>
> "Nori" == Nori Heikkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Nori> from http://spamassassin.taint.org/dist/README: " On Debian,
Nori> you can apt-get it from unstable, thanks to Duncan Findlay."
Nori> debian confirms this at
Nori> http://packages.debian.org/unstable/interprete
right command is
apt-get -t unstable install spamassassin
pauwel
Nori Heikkinen wrote:
on Sat, 05 Jan 2002 10:07:43PM -0600, Nori Heikkinen insinuated:
RTFM:
man procmail
http://spamassassin.taint.org/
http://spamassassin.taint.org/dist/README
so of course, having written this, and
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 12:46:30AM -0600, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> orange:~# apt-get install spamassassin/unstable
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> E: Couldn't find package spamassassin/unstable
>
> ? am i doing it wrong? (currently running potato)
first you
also sprach nori heikkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.06.0746 +0100]:
> so why can't i do:
>
> orange:~# apt-get install spamassassin/unstable
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> E: Couldn't find package spamassassin/unstable
>
> ? am i doing it wrong? (curren
on Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 08:27:13PM -0800, Paul E Condon ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> "Karsten M. Self" wrote:
<...>
> Where is there a HOWTO or tutorial on using available tools (e.g.
> procmail) to filter spam? Is it something that the "unwashed masses"
> like myself can learn to do?
Google wi
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 08:27:13PM -0800, Paul E Condon wrote:
| Where is there a HOWTO or tutorial on using available tools (e.g.
| procmail) to filter spam? Is it something that the "unwashed masses"
| like myself can learn to do?
If you would like, I can send you what I have.
I made a script I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul E Condon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Where is there a HOWTO or tutorial on using available tools (e.g. procmail) to
> filter spam? Is it something that the "unwashed masses" like myself can learn
> to do?
>
apt-get install spamassian
then
on Fri, 04 Jan 2002 08:27:13PM -0800, Paul E Condon insinuated:
> Where is there a HOWTO or tutorial on using available tools (e.g.
> procmail) to filter spam? Is it something that the "unwashed masses"
> like myself can learn to do?
RTFM:
man procmail
http://spamassassin.taint.org/
http://spamas
on Sat, 05 Jan 2002 10:07:43PM -0600, Nori Heikkinen insinuated:
> RTFM:
> man procmail
> http://spamassassin.taint.org/
> http://spamassassin.taint.org/dist/README
so of course, having written this, and having rtfm'ed myself, now i
have a question ...
from http://spamassassin.taint.org/dist/REA
"Karsten M. Self" wrote:
> on Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 01:43:46AM -0500, Alec ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Debian mailing lists are mirrored on (interfaced to) USENET under
> > linux.debian.*, and our email addresses aren't even scrambled! USENET is
> > probably the number one source for
on Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 01:43:46AM -0500, Alec ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi
>
> Debian mailing lists are mirrored on (interfaced to) USENET under
> linux.debian.*, and our email addresses aren't even scrambled! USENET is
> probably the number one source for the email address snooping spammers
: Debian Lists, USENET & Spam
John Hasler wrote:
> I'd rank the Web equal to or above Usenet. I receive a substantial
amount
> of spam at my debian.org address, and it can only be obtained via the
Web.
Well, or on cd.
--
see shy jo, who sees a new market for debian source cd's :-)
John Hasler wrote:
> I'd rank the Web equal to or above Usenet. I receive a substantial amount
> of spam at my debian.org address, and it can only be obtained via the Web.
Well, or on cd.
--
see shy jo, who sees a new market for debian source cd's :-)
Alec writes:
>> Debian mailing lists are mirrored on (interfaced to) USENET under
>> linux.debian.*, and our email addresses aren't even scrambled!
>> Debian mailing lists are archived on the Web and our email addresses aren't
>>even scrambled!
John writes:
> USENET is probably the number one sour
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Alec wrote:
> Debian mailing lists are mirrored on (interfaced to) USENET under
> linux.debian.*, and our email addresses aren't even scrambled! USENET is
You're point? If your mail server has decent spam trapping (which it
should), you shouldn't have a problem. I wish lists
Alec writes:
> Debian mailing lists are mirrored on (interfaced to) USENET under
> linux.debian.*, and our email addresses aren't even scrambled!
Debian mailing lists are archived on the Web and our email addresses aren't
even scrambled!
> USENET is probably the number one source for the email ad
Alec wrote:
> Debian mailing lists are mirrored on (interfaced to) USENET under
> linux.debian.*, and our email addresses aren't even scrambled! USENET is
> probably the number one source for the email address snooping spammers. Can
> they catch up with all of us one day?
The list archives are
40 matches
Mail list logo
