Re: Debian amd64 not detecting my network card (32 bit Debian does!)

On 10-07-13 02:15 PM, H.S. wrote: On 10-07-13 12:43 PM, H.S. wrote: I decided to install amd64 on my computer which has Asus M3 socket motherboard, M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3, chipset AMD 880G/SB850, and onboard gigabit lan controller, Realtek® 8111E. I installed 32 bit Debian using netinstall some da

Re: Debian amd64 not detecting my network card (32 bit Debian does!)

On 10-07-13 12:43 PM, H.S. wrote: I decided to install amd64 on my computer which has Asus M3 socket motherboard, M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3, chipset AMD 880G/SB850, and onboard gigabit lan controller, Realtek® 8111E. I installed 32 bit Debian using netinstall some days ago without too many problems (s

Re: Debian AMD64 Sid - "packages have unmet dependencies"

On Dec 19, 2009, at 6:59 AM, Johan Grönqvist wrote: Rick Thomas skrev: The following packages have unmet dependencies: xserver-xorg-video-apm: Depends: xserver-xorg-core (>= 2:1.6.99.900) but 2:1.6.5-1 is installed. and a bunch of other xserver-xorg-video-* packages have the same problem.

Re: Debian AMD64 Sid - "packages have unmet dependencies"

Rick Thomas skrev: The following packages have unmet dependencies: xserver-xorg-video-apm: Depends: xserver-xorg-core (>= 2:1.6.99.900) but 2:1.6.5-1 is installed. and a bunch of other xserver-xorg-video-* packages have the same problem. See news.debian.net at

Re: Debian AMD64 and Intel CPUs

On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 20:22, David Fox wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 2:24 PM, T o n g wrote: > > > Can someone tell me what kind of Intel CPUs have that EM64T? Any easy > > rule of thumb? E.g., can I safely assume all those Intel 64 Duecore are > > One needs to be careful with Intel nomencl

Re: Debian AMD64 and Intel CPUs

On Sun, 2009-07-12 at 20:22 -0700, David Fox wrote: > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 2:24 PM, T o n g wrote: > > > Can someone tell me what kind of Intel CPUs have that EM64T? > > Any easy rule of thumb? E.g., can I safely assume all those Intel > > 64 Duecore are > > One needs to be careful with Intel no

Re: Debian AMD64 and Intel CPUs

On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 2:24 PM, T o n g wrote: > Can someone tell me what kind of Intel CPUs have that EM64T? Any easy > rule of thumb? E.g., can I safely assume all those Intel 64 Duecore are One needs to be careful with Intel nomenclature. Some CoreDuos are 32 bit only, but most if not all cor

Re: Debian AMD64 and Intel CPUs

T o n g wrote: Hi, I've recently realized that Debian AMD64 is not only suitable for my AMD64 but some Intel CPUs as well. http://www.debian.org/ports/amd64/ says all Intel CPUs with EM64T extension are supported. Can someone tell me what kind of Intel CPUs have that EM64T? Any easy rule

Re: Debian AMD64 and Intel CPUs

On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 09:24:18PM +, T o n g wrote: > Can someone tell me what kind of Intel CPUs have that EM64T? Any easy > rule of thumb? E.g., can I safely assume all those Intel 64 Duecore are > able to run Debian AMD64? You should be able to find specifications of particular CPUs on

Re: Debian AMD64

On Sun January 11 2009, Ron Johnson wrote: > >> # ls -1 NVID*177.82*run > >> NVIDIA-Linux-x86-177.82-pkg1.run > >> NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-177.82-pkg2.run > > > > > wait, you have 177.82 ??? latest nvidia version now: NVIDIA-Linux-x86-180.22-pkg1.run -- Paul Cartwright Registered Linux user # 3678

Re: Debian AMD64

On Sun January 11 2009, Ron Johnson wrote: > > I think you meant ls -l > > ls -l NVID* > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 pbc  pbc  19865216 2008-07-08 08:00 > > NVIDIA-Linux-x86-173.14.09-pkg1.run > > -rw-r--r-- 1 pbc  pbc  19869479 2008-08-06 19:20 > > NVIDIA-Linux-x86-173.14.12-pkg1.run > > That's two different 3

Re: Debian AMD64

On 01/11/09 15:33, Paul Cartwright wrote: On Sun January 11 2009, Ron Johnson wrote: The .run files are containers, 18 meg shell scripts.. More than that! # ls -1 NVID*177.82*run NVIDIA-Linux-x86-177.82-pkg1.run NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-177.82-pkg2.run I think you meant ls -l ls -l NVID* -rwxr-x

Re: Debian AMD64

On Sun January 11 2009, Ron Johnson wrote: > >> The .run files are containers, > > > > 18 meg shell scripts.. > > More than that! > > # ls -1 NVID*177.82*run > NVIDIA-Linux-x86-177.82-pkg1.run > NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-177.82-pkg2.run I think you meant ls -l ls -l NVID* -rwxr-xr-x 1 pbc pbc 19865216

Re: Debian AMD64

On 01/11/09 13:07, Paul Cartwright wrote: On Sun January 11 2009, Ron Johnson wrote: The .run files are containers, 18 meg shell scripts.. More than that! # ls -1 NVID*177.82*run NVIDIA-Linux-x86-177.82-pkg1.run NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-177.82-pkg2.run I wouldn't do this from within X. But then

Re: Debian AMD64

On Sun January 11 2009, Ron Johnson wrote: > The .run files are containers, 18 meg shell scripts.. > > > with --no-kernel-module > > You need both the 32-bit *and* 64-bit .run files. > > 64-bit for the module, and 32-bit for everything else. do you still have a copy of the file you used that work

Re: Debian AMD64

On 01/10/09 13:58, Paul Cartwright wrote: On Sat January 10 2009, Ron Johnson wrote: Linux paulandcilla 2.6.26-1-amd64 Yup. I did it myself at the beginning of last month. (Except I rolled my own kernel.) I tried that once, I obviously didn't do everything right.. It takes some practice.

Re: Debian AMD64

On Sat January 10 2009, Ron Johnson wrote: > > Linux paulandcilla 2.6.26-1-amd64 > > Yup.  I did it myself at the beginning of last month.  (Except I > rolled my own kernel.) I tried that once, I obviously didn't do everything right.. > > Note that, officially, you'll have to get rid of any binary

Re: Debian AMD64

On 01/10/09 06:51, Paul Cartwright wrote: On Fri January 9 2009, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: Ron is right though. Unless you have a specific application that is 100%-ing your CPU, you probably aren't going to experience a measurable speed-up when moving to 64-bits. In fact, you might be bett

Re: Debian AMD64

On Fri January 9 2009, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > Ron is right though.  Unless you have a specific application that is > 100%-ing your CPU, you probably aren't going to experience a measurable > speed-up when moving to 64-bits.  In fact, you might be better off using a > 64-bit kernel and 32-b

Re: Debian AMD64

On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 12:45:21AM +, Nuno Magalhães wrote: > > I've never seen movie audio transcoding use 100% CPU. > Tanscoding from wav to ogg will top my CPU: AMD Athlon64 2.2GHz, i > assume video is mode demanding. What do you mean by ogg? vorbis? theora? (any video chipset that can dec

Re: Debian AMD64

On Friday 2009 January 09 18:45:21 Nuno Magalhães wrote: >> I've never seen movie audio transcoding use 100% CPU. > >Tanscoding from wav to ogg will top my CPU: AMD Athlon64 2.2GHz, i >assume video is mode demanding. It probably does it much faster than real-time though. Still, if you do enough

Re: Debian AMD64

On Friday 2009 January 09 18:16:43 Ron Johnson wrote: >On 01/09/09 17:23, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 02:29:19PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: >>> Even if watching a movie, a good video driver will shuffle as much as >>> possible to the GPU, reducing the *effective* benefit. While

Re: Debian AMD64

On 01/09/09 18:45, Nuno Magalhães wrote: I've never seen movie audio transcoding use 100% CPU. Tanscoding from wav to ogg will top my CPU: AMD Athlon64 2.2GHz, i assume video is mode demanding. Straight transcoding burns as much CPU as possible. But it's been Many Years (back to the Athlon-A

Re: Debian AMD64

> I've never seen movie audio transcoding use 100% CPU. Tanscoding from wav to ogg will top my CPU: AMD Athlon64 2.2GHz, i assume video is mode demanding. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.o

Re: Debian AMD64

On 01/09/09 15:15, Paul Johnson wrote: Ron Johnson wrote: On 01/09/09 11:41, Paul Johnson wrote: Koh Choon Lin wrote: On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 08:40:48PM +0800, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote: I just got my Compaq laptop CQ40-115AU and I want to install Lenny AMD64. What's the different if I use AMD64

Re: Debian AMD64

On 01/09/09 17:23, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 02:29:19PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: On 01/09/09 13:52, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 01:30:02PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: The only benefit which x86-64 has in 64-bit mode is extra registers. But that only benefit

Re: Debian AMD64

On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 02:29:19PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 01/09/09 13:52, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 01:30:02PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: >> >>> The only benefit which x86-64 has in 64-bit mode is extra registers. >>> But that only benefits computationally-intensive p

Re: Debian AMD64

Ron Johnson wrote: > On 01/09/09 11:41, Paul Johnson wrote: >> Koh Choon Lin wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 08:40:48PM +0800, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote: >>> I just got my Compaq laptop CQ40-115AU and I want to install Lenny >>> AMD64. What's the different if I use AMD64 instead of i386.

Re: Debian AMD64

On 01/09/09 13:52, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 01:30:02PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: The only benefit which x86-64 has in 64-bit mode is extra registers. But that only benefits computationally-intensive programs. Those actually help just about anywwhere. As long as your compi

Re: Debian AMD64

On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 01:30:02PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > The only benefit which x86-64 has in 64-bit mode is extra registers. But > that only benefits computationally-intensive programs. Those actually help just about anywwhere. As long as your compiler knows how to use them. And it does

Re: Debian AMD64

On 01/09/09 11:41, Paul Johnson wrote: Koh Choon Lin wrote: On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 08:40:48PM +0800, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote: I just got my Compaq laptop CQ40-115AU and I want to install Lenny AMD64. What's the different if I use AMD64 instead of i386. My main use of laptop is for word processi

Re: Debian AMD64

On Friday 09 January 2009, Paul Johnson wrote: > Koh Choon Lin wrote: > ... > > > > Would a 32bit OS on 64bit system be at least 50% faster than a 32 > > bitOS on 32bit system? I assume the fastest setup would be a 64bit > > OS on 64bit system. > > Let's rephrase this with a visual. Would a two-

Re: Debian AMD64

Koh Choon Lin wrote: On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 08:40:48PM +0800, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote: > I just got my Compaq laptop CQ40-115AU and I want to install Lenny > AMD64. What's the different if I use AMD64 instead of i386. My main > use of laptop is for word processing and virtualizatio

Re: Debian AMD64

According to my experience, after the release of flash 64 bit, only Citrix ICA Client is actually a trouble (and i use it only on my 32bit system), better, the setup of dependency libraries was a mess...

Re: Debian AMD64

On 01/09/09 07:15, Koh Choon Lin wrote: On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 08:40:48PM +0800, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote: I just got my Compaq laptop CQ40-115AU and I want to install Lenny AMD64. What's the different if I use AMD64 instead of i386. My main use of laptop is for word processing and virtualization

Re: Debian AMD64

>> > On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 08:40:48PM +0800, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote: >> >> I just got my Compaq laptop CQ40-115AU and I want to install Lenny >> >> AMD64. What's the different if I use AMD64 instead of i386. My main >> >> use of laptop is for word processing and virtualization. Would a 32bit OS

Re: Debian AMD64

On Wednesday 2009 January 07 04:18:27 Sjoerd Hardeman wrote: > Joel Roth schreef: > > On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 08:40:48PM +0800, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote: > >> I just got my Compaq laptop CQ40-115AU and I want to install Lenny > >> AMD64. What's the different if I use AMD64 instead of i386. My main >

Re: Debian AMD64

with `lspci |grep -i wireless` you can obtain enough information about your wifi card and the proper module to load and if you don't... google is your friend wifi kernel modules are in debian lenny and I think you should have wireless-tool and kwifimanager installed eg. on my laptop I got an "int

Re: Debian AMD64

right now, i'm having problem installing wifi driver for lenny. Now trying with mad wifi, i how do i know which module to load? 2009/1/7 Sjoerd Hardeman : > Joel Roth schreef: >> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 08:40:48PM +0800, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote: >>> I just got my Compaq laptop CQ40-115AU and I want

Re: Debian AMD64

Joel Roth schreef: > On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 08:40:48PM +0800, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote: >> I just got my Compaq laptop CQ40-115AU and I want to install Lenny >> AMD64. What's the different if I use AMD64 instead of i386. My main >> use of laptop is for word processing and virtualization. >> >> Can a

Re: Debian AMD64

On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 08:40:48PM +0800, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote: > I just got my Compaq laptop CQ40-115AU and I want to install Lenny > AMD64. What's the different if I use AMD64 instead of i386. My main > use of laptop is for word processing and virtualization. > > Can any of AMD64 user share th

Re: Debian AMD64

So, it s possible to use 64bit OS now in the `same speed` than 32bit system? Now the difference is not a `sacrifice`(joke hehe)? On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 01/06/09 10:56, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: > >> Sam Leon wrote: >> >>> To get a pdf plugin for iceweasel you ha

Re: Debian AMD64

On 01/06/09 10:56, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: Sam Leon wrote: To get a pdf plugin for iceweasel you have to install acroread mozilla-acroread nspluginwrapper from debian multimedia repos. However the bugs in mozilla-acroread https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/acroread/+bug/236219 are wor

Re: Debian AMD64

Sam Leon wrote: > To get a pdf plugin for iceweasel you have to install acroread > mozilla-acroread nspluginwrapper from debian multimedia repos. However > the bugs in mozilla-acroread > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/acroread/+bug/236219 are > worsened by the amd64 environment Why one

Re: Debian AMD64

Umarzuki Mochlis wrote: I just got my Compaq laptop CQ40-115AU and I want to install Lenny AMD64. What's the different if I use AMD64 instead of i386. My main use of laptop is for word processing and virtualization. Can any of AMD64 user share their experience or perhaps a bit of advice? No p

Re: Debian AMD64

On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:58:21 -0200 Samir Cury wrote: > Problems that i remember to get and some friends had too was mainly with > java and flash installation. But if you really want, everything is easy. > flash is solved now that there is a 64bit version out. java plugin is still a problem (ther

Re: Debian AMD64

On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:56:52 -0200 Samir Cury wrote: > I tried to use it on my desktop AMD64 a year ago, and i had some problems > with software installing, maybe it does exists but sometimes is harder to > find, in the end you gain speed, but spend more time making your system as > you want. >

RE: Debian AMD64

> From: Umarzuki Mochlis [mailto:umarz...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 8:13 AM > Subject: Re: Debian AMD64 > > Come to think of it, my main concern for this laptop (CQ40-115AU) is > it's wifi, altec lansing audio and it's webcam whether anyone ever

Re: Debian AMD64

Come to think of it, my main concern for this laptop (CQ40-115AU) is it's wifi, altec lansing audio and it's webcam whether anyone ever got them working on Lenny AMD64. Now still googling on that. 2009/1/6 lostson : > On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 15:07 +0200, Johann Spies wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 a

Re: Debian AMD64

On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 15:07 +0200, Johann Spies wrote: > On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 08:40:48PM +0800, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote: > > I just got my Compaq laptop CQ40-115AU and I want to install Lenny > > AMD64. What's the different if I use AMD64 instead of i386. My main > > use of laptop is for word pro

Re: Debian AMD64

You'd be better off asking on debian-amd64. If you have an amd64 CPU, use debian amd64. I have no problems with Netbeans or youtube, to name a few. Nuno Magalhães

Re: Debian AMD64

On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 08:40:48PM +0800, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote: > I just got my Compaq laptop CQ40-115AU and I want to install Lenny > AMD64. What's the different if I use AMD64 instead of i386. My main > use of laptop is for word processing and virtualization. > > Can any of AMD64 user share th

Re: Debian AMD64

Problems that i remember to get and some friends had too was mainly with java and flash installation. But if you really want, everything is easy. On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Samir Cury wrote: > I tried to use it on my desktop AMD64 a year ago, and i had some problems > with software install

Re: Debian AMD64

I tried to use it on my desktop AMD64 a year ago, and i had some problems with software installing, maybe it does exists but sometimes is harder to find, in the end you gain speed, but spend more time making your system as you want. I don't think that still is advantage, maybe if you wanna learn o

Re: Debian AMD64 boots only at random: how to use labels/fstab/grub

On 10/02/06 09:40:00AM -0700, Bob McGowan wrote: > Sorry, I forgot that bit ;( > > The command 'mkswap -L label device' will create a swap area and add a > label for it. This should probably be done from a rescue disk > environment, so you don't confuse the running kernel with changes to its >

Re: Debian AMD64 boots only at random: how to use labels/fstab/grub

Sorry, I forgot that bit ;( The command 'mkswap -L label device' will create a swap area and add a label for it. This should probably be done from a rescue disk environment, so you don't confuse the running kernel with changes to its swap area. I'm not aware of a separate tool to label a swa

Re: Debian AMD64 boots only at random: how to use labels/fstab/grub

This one time, at band camp, Joost Kraaijeveld said: > Hi Bob, > > Thanks: it works as described. > > Just 1 other question: can I label my swap partition? > > If I try e2label /dev/sda5 /my_name it returns: > > e2label: Bad magic number in super-block while trying to open /dev/sdb5 > Couldn'

Re: Debian AMD64 boots only at random: how to use labels/fstab/grub

Hi Bob, Thanks: it works as described. Just 1 other question: can I label my swap partition? If I try e2label /dev/sda5 /my_name it returns: e2label: Bad magic number in super-block while trying to open /dev/sdb5 Couldn't find valid filesystem superblock. TIA -- Groeten, Joost Kraaijeveld

Re: Debian AMD64 boots only at random: how to use labels/fstab/grub

On 9/29/06, Joost Kraaijeveld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, After an update of my kernel to 2.6.17 my machine only boots at random. I have googled for a solution and it appears that it happens because of the way the harddisks are found during startup . The solution described involves using labl

Re: Debian AMD64 boots only at random: how to use labels/fstab/grub

I'm only familiar with the ext[23]/xfs filesystem commands which is what you appear to be using. Other FS's have similar tools, I expect. First, you need to be sure your disks are labeled. For ext[23], the command is 'e2label -L /dev/...' where ... would be sda4 or hdb2, or whatever else you

Re: debian amd64 and ati propietary driver

Oops. On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 15:03 +0100, Michael Dominok wrote: > Hi Toshiro, > > On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 11:49 -0200, Toshiro wrote: > > Did you have to compile a new kernel or does it work with the kernel images > > provided by Debian? > > No. It should have been: "No & Yes." -- To UNS

Re: debian amd64 and ati propietary driver

Hi Toshiro, On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 11:49 -0200, Toshiro wrote: > Did you have to compile a new kernel or does it work with the kernel images > provided by Debian? No. asterix:~$ uname -a Linux asterix 2.6.12-1-amd64-k8 #1 Wed Sep 28 02:31:26 CEST 2005 x86_64 GNU/Linux That's the linux-image-2.

Re: debian amd64 and ati propietary driver

Hi Michael, Thanks for information! Did you have to compile a new kernel or does it work with the kernel images provided by Debian? Toshiro. > On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 11:34 -0200, Toshiro wrote: > > Anybody managed to successfully use the ATI drivers with the AMD64 Debian > > port? > > yepp, i'm

Re: debian amd64 and ati propietary driver

Hi, On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 11:34 -0200, Toshiro wrote: > Anybody managed to successfully use the ATI drivers with the AMD64 Debian > port? yepp, i'm typing this mail on such a system. Have you taken a look at: http://www.stanchina.net/~flavio/debian/fglrx-installer.html And b.t.w.: There's