On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 09:23:26AM -0500, Debian Ghost wrote:
> Hey Steve,
> Thanks for the reply.
> I did what you suggested and didn't find anything I am missing.
> Can you look at this and tell me if I am missing what I am missing ? :)
>
> p.s- is the second package acronym a joke ? (pathologic
¡°¡mWayne Topa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>¡n¡G
> Subject: Re: DESTROY (perl experts please) (fwd)
> Date: Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 12:07:06PM +1100
> In reply to:Damien
> Quoting Damien([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > hrm. afaik, unstable refers to the helixcode distribution - thu
Subject: Re: DESTROY (perl experts please) (fwd)
Date: Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 12:07:06PM +1100
In reply to:Damien
Quoting Damien([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > >
> > > deb http://spidermonkey.helixcode.com/distributions/debian unstable main
> >
> >
> > deb http://spidermonkey.helixcode.com/distributions/debian unstable main
>Thats Woody, not Potato
> Potato is stable _not_ unstable
hrm. afaik, unstable refers to the helixcode distribution - thus unstable
helixcode will
Subject: DESTROY (perl experts please) (fwd)
Date: Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 05:05:25PM -0500
In reply to:Debian Ghost
Quoting Debian Ghost([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Subject: RE: DESTROY (perl experts please)
>
> I don't seem to get the same reply back when I apt-cache
Ah, sorry about that, went to the bathroom and some guy at work was funny
:-)
// Steeve.
> -Original Message-
> From: Steeve Lennmark
> Sent: den 29 november 2000 15:38
> To: 'Debian Ghost'
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subj
Tja!
Steeve har. Hur mas det?
> -Original Message-
> From: Debian Ghost [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: den 29 november 2000 15:23
> To: Steeve Lennmark
> Cc: 'Debian Ghost'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: RE: DESTROY
>
&
n @INC.
>
> // Steeve.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Debian Ghost [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: den 29 november 2000 14:16
> > To: Joey Hess
> > Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: Re: DESTROY
> >
> >
> > I d
> Sent: den 29 november 2000 14:14
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: Re: DESTROY
> >
> >
> > Ah,
> > That may explain it.
> > I had tried to upgrade from potato to woody, and as soon as
> > the
perl --version
Debconf aint the problem, the problem is some missing modules in @INC.
// Steeve.
> -Original Message-
> From: Debian Ghost [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: den 29 november 2000 14:16
> To: Joey Hess
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re:
Nah, you just need some other perl-stuff, try: apt-cache search perl | grep
5.6
// Steeve.
> -Original Message-
> From: Debian Ghost [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: den 29 november 2000 14:14
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re:
I don't know much about perl or debconf.
What is the best way to see which perl and debconf I have?
I had to back out of a woody install, but I don't think some things got
backed down (perl maybe being one)
Thanks!
D. Ghost
Ah,
That may explain it.
I had tried to upgrade from potato to woody, and as soon as the woody perl
was installed, my apt-get upgrade really crashed. All the packages started
having conflicts with each other (specifically gnome packages).
Maybe I need to upgrade perl? Should I dpkg --purge perl o
Mark Blunier wrote:
> I get the same thing. I installed potato, but I'm in the process of
> upgrading to woody. No debconf, but debconf-tiny0.2.80.17.
> perl-5.005.03-7.1, and perl-5.6.0-3
You really should install debconf proper to replace the seriously out of
date debconf-tiny.
Anyway, it tur
Debian Ghost wrote:
> I've lately been noticing this 'DESTROY' message coming up when I apt-get
> a package. I am not sure what it is or what it means. Can anyone give me a
> hint as to what this means?
>
> 0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> Need to get 246kB
15 matches
Mail list logo
