Re: [computers] bad sectors on disk

Le 12/02/2016 05:12, David Wright a écrit : I can't see any point in running badblocks and not putting any bad blocks that it finds into the badblock inode. So running inode is related to filesystem, so any repartitioning needs to re-run badblocks and can be as long as one day. I often noti

Re: [computers] bad sectors on disk

On Wed 10 Feb 2016 at 20:05:39 (-0800), Joseph Loo wrote: > > On 9 February 2016 at 19:57, Ritesh Raj Sarraf > On my RPi2, I saw the following reported by my kernel. > > > > [156278.815976] sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] UNKNOWN(0x2003) Result: > > hostbyte=0x00 driverbyte=0x00 > > [156278.82

Re: [computers] bad sectors on disk

On 02/10/2016 07:35 PM, TWS Admin wrote: > Please remove julius.robe...@wildernes.org.au > from this list, he's no longer > working with us. > > thanks, > > the Wilderness society > > On 9 February 2016 at 19:57, Ritesh Raj Sarraf

Re: [computers] bad sectors on disk

Please remove julius.robe...@wildernes.org.au from this list, he's no longer working with us. thanks, the Wilderness society On 9 February 2016 at 19:57, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Hello, > > On my RPi2, I saw the following reported by my kernel. > > [156278.815976] sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] UNKNOWN(0

Re: Computers doesn't power off

Kent West wrote: 2) If you're really running a 386, that kernel is acceptable, but if you've got a Pentium-class machine, you might want to upgrade to a -586, or -686, or -K7, etc kernel, which is optimized for these other CPUs. Just do an "apt-get search kernel-image | more" to see what kernel

Re: Computers doesn't power off

Adam Funk wrote: I've done that sort of thing before so I'll stick with it instead of using the GUI version [e.g. 'modconf' - Kent]. Which of these modules do I need to load for this? /lib/modules/2.4.23-1-386/kernel/drivers/acpi/ac.o /lib/modules/2.4.23-1-386/kernel/drivers/acpi/asus_acpi.o /lib

Re: Computers doesn't power off

Adam Funk wrote: I've done that sort of thing before so I'll stick with it instead of using the GUI version [e.g. 'modconf' - Kent]. Which of these modules do I need to load for this? /lib/modules/2.4.23-1-386/kernel/drivers/acpi/ac.o /lib/modules/2.4.23-1-386/kernel/drivers/acpi/asus_acpi.o /lib

Re: Computers doesn't power off

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Piers Kittel wrote: Upgraded to the 2.4.27 kernels on both my work and home computers but now I find that they both don't power the computer off automatically, I have to push the power button manually when the computers has shut down - how to make it

Re: Computers doesn't power off

On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Piers Kittel wrote: > Upgraded to the 2.4.27 kernels on both my work and home computers but > now I find that they both don't power the computer off automatically, I > have to push the power button manually when the computers has shut down > - how to make it turn itself off no

Re: Computers doesn't power off

On Friday 27 August 2004 04:10, Kent West wrote: > It's a point-and-click type application for loading/unloading modules. > In addition, it'll add (and remove?) module entries from > "/etc/modules". > > If you know the name of the module you wish to install (see > /lib/modules/[kernel-version/ di

Re: Computers doesn't power off

Adam Funk wrote: On Thursday 26 August 2004 16:00, Kent West wrote: I think what Adam might want to do is to run "modconf", go down to the "kernel/drivers/acpi" section, and install any necessary features in that manner. (I think different versions of modconf look different, so if you're not run

Re: Computers doesn't power off

On Thursday 26 August 2004 16:00, Kent West wrote: > I think it's a good learning process to be able to roll your own, but > just to get standard hardware features to work, it's a bit overkill > for the majority of new users coming into the GNU/Linux camp. (Still, > as Loki says, it's a good thing

Re: Computers doesn't power off

Loki wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Adam Funk wrote: On Wednesday 25 August 2004 20:10, Adam Funk wrote: How do you enable APM or ACPI in the kernel? Let me rephrase that. How can I enable ACPI in a stock Debian kernel? (I have no experienc

Re: Computers doesn't power off

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Adam Funk wrote: > On Wednesday 25 August 2004 20:10, Adam Funk wrote: > > > How do you enable APM or ACPI in the kernel? > > Let me rephrase that. How can I enable ACPI in a stock Debian kernel? > (I have no experience in compil

Re: Computers doesn't power off

On Wednesday 25 August 2004 20:10, Adam Funk wrote: > How do you enable APM or ACPI in the kernel? Let me rephrase that. How can I enable ACPI in a stock Debian kernel? (I have no experience in compiling my own kernel.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubs

Re: Computers doesn't power off

On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 08:21:52PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: > It is by no means obsolete. I use it in place of ACPI where necessary, since > ACPI support has been more flaky than pie pastry. Oops. Must have misremebered... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsub

Re: Computers doesn't power off

cd into your kernel source directory, and start the configuration program ('make menuconfig' in most cases..) you will need to have 'make' and other tools installed in order to do so (ncurses and a bunch of other dependencies) in your kernel config, go to the power management section and choose

Re: Computers doesn't power off

On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 12:16:57PM -0700, Stefan O'Rear wrote: > Last I heard APM is obsolete in favor of ACPI, but I use APM instead > because my {2.2.20 kernel, motherboard} doesn't support ACPI. It is by no means obsolete. I use it in place of ACPI where necessary, since ACPI support has been

Re: Computers doesn't power off

On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 06:49:39PM +, Adam Funk wrote: > On Tuesday 24 August 2004 22:20, Stefan O'Rear wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 10:09:02PM +0100, Piers Kittel wrote: > >> Upgraded to the 2.4.27 kernels on both my work and home computers but > >> now I find that they both don't pow

Re: Computers doesn't power off

On Tuesday 24 August 2004 22:20, Stefan O'Rear wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 10:09:02PM +0100, Piers Kittel wrote: >> Upgraded to the 2.4.27 kernels on both my work and home computers but >> now I find that they both don't power the computer off automatically, >> I have to push the power button

Re: Computers doesn't power off

On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 10:09:02PM +0100, Piers Kittel wrote: > Upgraded to the 2.4.27 kernels on both my work and home computers but > now I find that they both don't power the computer off automatically, I > have to push the power button manually when the computers has shut down > - how to mak

Re: Computers doesn't power off

On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 10:09:02PM +0100, Piers Kittel wrote: > Upgraded to the 2.4.27 kernels on both my work and home computers but > now I find that they both don't power the computer off automatically, I > have to push the power button manually when the computers has shut down > - how to mak

Re: Computers

On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 16:50:30 -0800, Gene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Vikki Roemer wrote: >>On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 02:59:37PM -0600, Steve Waterman wrote: >> >>>Glenn: >>> >>>Are we going to purchase two computers for Kim Wallace and Jim Vanderslice? >>> >>>Steve >> >>I don't know, but while you're

Re: Computers

On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 08:43, Joyce, Matthew wrote: > Is that two between them or two each ? > If we don't purchase them, should we consider stealing them ? > > Matt No just download them from kaazaa Bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont

Re: Computers

since everyone is joining in, and before someone close this thread, i would like cash instead, i'll build my own : ) Vikki Roemer wrote: On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 02:59:37PM -0600, Steve Waterman wrote: Glenn: Are we going to purchase two computers for Kim Wallace and Jim Vanderslice? Steve

Re: Computers

On 11/18/02 6:17 PM, "Vikki Roemer" wrote: > I don't know, but while you're buying computers for people, can you > get me one, too? I only want one computer, so I'm cheaper to buy for > than them. *grin* Dude! Your getting a Dell :O -- Thanks!! David Thurman List Only at Web Presence Group Net

Re: Computers

On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 02:59:37PM -0600, Steve Waterman wrote: > Glenn: > > Are we going to purchase two computers for Kim Wallace and Jim Vanderslice? > > Steve > I don't know, but while you're buying computers for people, can you get me one, too? I only want one computer, so I'm cheaper to

RE: Computers

Both Vlada On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 22:43, Joyce, Matthew wrote: > Is that two between them or two each ? > If we don't purchase them, should we consider stealing them ? > > Matt > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Steve Waterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, 19 November 2

RE: Computers

Is that two between them or two each ? If we don't purchase them, should we consider stealing them ? Matt > -Original Message- > From: Steve Waterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, 19 November 2002 8:00 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Computers > > > Glenn: > > Are

Re: Computers

> > Glenn: > > > > Are we going to purchase two computers for Kim Wallace and Jim Vanderslice? > > > > Steve > > Yes, and we're mailing them to a debian user in Canada, for some strange reason. > > "Glenn" Hey! =I'm= Glenn. Am I getting charged for this? Glenn "No-Quotes" Becker +

Re: Computers

On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Steve Waterman wrote: > Glenn: > > Are we going to purchase two computers for Kim Wallace and Jim Vanderslice? > > Steve Yes, and we're mailing them to a debian user in Canada, for some strange reason. "Glenn" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Re: Computers

On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 02:59:37PM -0600, Steve Waterman wrote: > Glenn: > > Are we going to purchase two computers for Kim Wallace and Jim Vanderslice? Nah, let's give them etch-a-sketches instead. Think they'll notice? -- Nathan Norman - Incanus Networking mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] What's n