Re: RE: Built 2.6.14!

2005-12-17 Thread Jim McCloskey
David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: |> > I note that any attempt to place CONFIG_DEVFS=y (or CONFIG_DEVFS_FS |> > as implied |> > in the Makefile by the devfs sources!!) produces an undefined symbol error. I |> > did, however, notice some errors dealing with devfs elsewhere. In any event,

RE: Built 2.6.14!

2005-12-15 Thread David Baron
>>1. I am not using udev. Apparently not using devfs either because I compiled >>that into the kernel with no change. Since I am based on an older knoppix >>install, what exactly am I using? Devpts is what? How do I get modules active >>and alsa working? >I note that any attempt to place CONFI

RE: Built 2.6.14!

2005-12-14 Thread David Baron
>1. I am not using udev. Apparently not using devfs either because I compiled >that into the kernel with no change. Since I am based on an older knoppix >install, what exactly am I using? Devpts is what? How do I get modules active >and alsa working? I note that any attempt to place CONFIG_DEVF

Re: Built 2.6.14!

2005-12-14 Thread Jon Dowland
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 10:34:05AM -0500, Piszcz, Justin wrote: > Why use initrd at all (as long as you are not using a RAID ROOT > volume) Yeah I'd avoid usind initrd. The only problem there is since you based your config on the existing one for the debian kernel, you may need to go through and d

RE: Built 2.6.14!

2005-12-14 Thread Piszcz, Justin
Why use initrd at all (as long as you are not using a RAID ROOT volume) Try installing with ik, http://installkernel.tripod.com/ Configure your kernel and LILO/GRUB then run: ./ik -i Then reboot. -Original Message- From: David Baron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December