Re: ATI Rage 128 PF/PRO AGP 4x TMDS

2011-09-21 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:31:33 -0400, co...@esid.gecgr.co.cu wrote in message <4ae059fcfc262fd39f8bd71a9798a9a2.squir...@sax.esid.gecgr.co.cu>: > Hello > > I use Debian Squeeze > > > Where I can find drivers for ATI Rage 128 PF / PRO AGP 4x TMDS for > Linux?? ..e.g. "aptitude search mach64" or "

Re: ATI Rage 128 PF/PRO AGP 4x TMDS

2011-09-20 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 21/09/11 08:31, co...@esid.gecgr.co.cu wrote: > Hello > > I use Debian Squeeze > > > Where I can find drivers for ATI Rage 128 PF / PRO AGP 4x TMDS for Linux?? > > At AMD, there is nothing of this. AMD? Do you mean ATI? > > > I tried with 2 ATI cards and I want to work the TV but I have

RE: ATI Rage 128

2003-02-28 Thread Brooks R. Robinson
| I'm encountering a few problems with this product - on two different | machines (with the same kind of video card) | | In MODCONF, there's an option for framebuffers. If I choose to install | the Rage 128 - my screen goes "nuts". If I memorized the keystrokes, I | can remove the framebuffer mod

Re: ATI Rage 128

2003-02-25 Thread Aaron Isotton
On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 20:44, Daniel L. Miller wrote: > I'm encountering a few problems with this product - on two different > machines (with the same kind of video card) > > In MODCONF, there's an option for framebuffers. If I choose to install > the Rage 128 - my screen goes "nuts". If I memori

Re: ATI Rage 128 and XFree 4.1

2002-06-27 Thread Michael Jinks
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 07:52:55AM +0100, Peter Whysall wrote: > > I've had success using this mirror: > > deb ftp://ftp.nlc.no/pub/debian/x4.2 sid/$(ARCH)/ I get the same error there; "no such file or directory" for the package listing. I think it's not a mirror problem so much as ignorance on

Re: ATI Rage 128 and XFree 4.1

2002-06-27 Thread Peter Whysall
On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 00:29, Michael Jinks wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 11:15:05AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > > > If you're on the verge of doing 2, it might be better to help test > > Branden's 4.2 packages. Mirrors are listed here: > > > > > > http://www.debianplanet.org/article.php?

Re: ATI Rage 128 and XFree 4.1

2002-06-26 Thread Michael Jinks
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 11:15:05AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > If you're on the verge of doing 2, it might be better to help test > Branden's 4.2 packages. Mirrors are listed here: > > http://www.debianplanet.org/article.php?sid=696&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0 Trying to do this and running

Re: ATI Rage 128 and XFree 4.1

2002-06-26 Thread Omen Wild
Quoting Omen Wild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, Jun 26 12:13: > [ snip ] > I just cannot use the DRM 4.1 kernel driver for the Rage > 128 or X locks up. Now that I think about it, using the kernel 4.1 > driver with X 4.2 seems like it could be a bad idea... [ snip ] Hmmm, talking to myself again.

Re: ATI Rage 128 and XFree 4.1

2002-06-26 Thread Omen Wild
Quoting Michael Jinks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, Jun 26 10:42: > > > 2. Download the binary distribution of XFree86 4.2 and install this over > > your Debian install. I'm jumping in a little late in this discussion, but I just solved this problem on the Dell Optiplex GX240 with a ATI Technologies

Re: ATI Rage 128 and XFree 4.1

2002-06-26 Thread Michael Jinks
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 10:22:36AM +0100, Peter Whysall wrote: > > I have one of these on my desk at work, it's running Sid/Windows XP. The ATI > card is a strange Rage 128 Ultra TF, which isn't even listed on ATI's web > site. I'm guessing that it's an OEM Spesh for Dell. Figures... > 1. use th

Re: ATI Rage 128 and XFree 4.1

2002-06-26 Thread Peter Whysall
Colin Watson writes: On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 10:22:36AM +0100, Peter Whysall wrote: You have two options. 1. use the "vesa" driver and live with extremely shonky video performance. 2. Download the binary distribution of XFree86 4.2 and install this over your Debian install. If you're on the

Re: ATI Rage 128 and XFree 4.1

2002-06-26 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 10:22:36AM +0100, Peter Whysall wrote: > You have two options. > > 1. use the "vesa" driver and live with extremely shonky video performance. > 2. Download the binary distribution of XFree86 4.2 and install this over > your Debian install. If you're on the verge of doing 2

Re: ATI Rage 128 and XFree 4.1

2002-06-26 Thread Peter Whysall
- Original Message - From: "Michael Jinks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Helgi ?rn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Carlos Sousa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Debian User List" Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:59 PM Subject: Re: ATI Rage 128 and XFr

Re: ATI Rage 128 and XFree 4.1

2002-06-26 Thread Ernst-Magne Vindal
On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 01:01, Michael Jinks wrote: OK I have this in my XF86Config-4 file, on ibm x20 EndSection Section "Device" Identifier "Generic Video Card" Driver "ati" Option "UseFBDev" "true" EndSection Section "Monitor"

Re: ATI Rage 128 and XFree 4.1

2002-06-25 Thread Michael Jinks
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 07:35:01PM +0200, Ernst-Magne Vindal wrote: > > I don't know if you are running laptop or not, but I have two different > laptops (an old compac armada and a new ibm thinkpadx20) with ati rage > mobility and x4.1 and -2 with no problems. I also have a stationary, but > as "

Re: ATI Rage 128 and XFree 4.1

2002-06-25 Thread Michael Jinks
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 05:41:43PM +0200, Helgi ?rn wrote: > > > Is this on a laptop too? In Michaels case I think it was a laptop. FYI no, it's a Dell Optiplex GX240. Mini desktop, video on the motherboard. -mrj -- # Michael Jinks, IB # JFI/MRSEC/EFI Computing # University of Chicago #

Re: ATI Rage 128 and XFree 4.1

2002-06-25 Thread Michael Jinks
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 07:00:14PM -0500, Steven A. Reisman wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 06:24:59PM -0500, Michael Jinks wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 08:41:06PM +0200, Helgi ?rn Helgason wrote: > > > > > > Section "Device" > > > Identifier "Ati Rage 128" > > > VideoRam81

Re: ATI Rage 128 and XFree 4.1

2002-06-22 Thread Ernst-Magne Vindal
On Sat, 2002-06-22 at 22:26, Walter Reed wrote: OK Didn't know that Ati Rage Mobility was a mach64 chip, so that's interesting info. Anyway, I have it successfully used it at both woody and sid, and the current installation on the x20 is woody, with a few sid packages :) /ernst > On Sat, Jun 22

Re: ATI Rage 128 and XFree 4.1

2002-06-22 Thread Walter Reed
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 07:35:01PM +0200, Ernst-Magne Vindal wrote: > On Sat, 2002-06-22 at 17:41, Helgi Örn wrote: > > Hi > I don't know if you are running laptop or not, but I have two different > laptops (an old compac armada and a new ibm thinkpadx20) with ati rage > mobility and x4.1 and -2 w

Re: ATI Rage 128 and XFree 4.1

2002-06-22 Thread Ernst-Magne Vindal
On Sat, 2002-06-22 at 17:41, Helgi Örn wrote: Hi I don't know if you are running laptop or not, but I have two different laptops (an old compac armada and a new ibm thinkpadx20) with ati rage mobility and x4.1 and -2 with no problems. I also have a stationary, but as "Driver" I use "ati" not r128.

Re: ATI Rage 128 and XFree 4.1

2002-06-22 Thread Helgi Örn
On Sat, 2002-06-22 at 13:47, Carlos Sousa wrote: > I have a similar problem with my ATI Rage 128 card, there's no way to > make it work automatically with the r128 X driver (XFree 4.1.0). > > I googled the net and found a suggestion to use a ChipID line. My config > looks like this: > >Secti

Re: ATI Rage 128 and XFree 4.1

2002-06-22 Thread Lorens Kulla
I had to ftp to the Xfree site and download 4.2 for my Rage 128 agp card. Have not had a problem with it at all. let me know if you want my config. Larry On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 12:58, Michael Jinks wrote: > A group of my users have bought a big batch of Dell desktops with what > appears to be an A

Re: ATI Rage 128 and XFree 4.1

2002-06-22 Thread Carlos Sousa
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 18:24:59 -0500 Michael Jinks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 08:41:06PM +0200, Helgi ?rn Helgason wrote: > > > > Section "Device" > > Identifier "Ati Rage 128" > > VideoRam8192 > > Driver "r128" > > Option "dp

Re: ATI Rage 128 and XFree 4.1

2002-06-21 Thread Marc Barnett
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 11:58:22AM -0500, Michael Jinks wrote: > My usual process for getting acquainted with new hardware is to start by > installing RedHat, archive /etc, install Debian, and then crib from the > RedHat /etc for those bits of hardware that Debian doesn't autodetect. > In the prese

Re: ATI Rage 128 and XFree 4.1

2002-06-21 Thread Helgi Örn
On Sat, 2002-06-22 at 01:24, Michael Jinks wrote: > Hm. Nope, still crashes; output from X server is attached in case it > helps. Looks to me like it's seeing my hardware and then dying anyway > for some reason but I don't see anything that looks like a complaint > before the final "No devices de

Re: ATI Rage 128 and XFree 4.1

2002-06-21 Thread Michael Jinks
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 08:41:06PM +0200, Helgi ?rn Helgason wrote: > > Section "Device" > Identifier "Ati Rage 128" > VideoRam8192 > Driver "r128" > Option "dpms" > EndSection Hm. Nope, still crashes; output from X server is attached in cas

Re: ATI Rage 128 and XFree 4.1

2002-06-21 Thread Helgi Örn Helgason
On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 18:58, Michael Jinks wrote: [snip] > Driver "r128" > > ...but that fails under Debian unless I change it to: > > Driver "vesa" > [snip] > Hi Michael! I'm running this chip on a Gateway stationary box, it took a while to tweak it in Woody

Re: ATI Rage 128 frambuffer questiosn

2001-11-04 Thread Stephen Gran
Thus spake Stan Brown: > I have a machine with an ATI Rage 128 video card. This machine has potato + > Progeny + 2.4.13 kernel. I have manged to get frambuffer working, but I > can't figure out how to use anything other than the default resolution/font > size. I managed to amke it use a higher deni

Re: ATI Rage 128 Pro 4xAGP

2001-09-14 Thread Berthold Cogel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi all! > I've been trying to get my ATI Rage 128 Pro 4xAGP (32MB RAM) to > work with X, but have been unsuccessful. Please, help me... > >---> M A R T I N <--- > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "u

Re: ATI Rage 128 Pro 4xAGP

2001-09-13 Thread Jorge Delgado
Hi I have a similar card in my laptop and it works fine. I'm attaching my /etc/XF86Config-4 file Good Luck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all! I've been trying to get my ATI Rage 128 Pro 4xAGP (32MB RAM) to work with X, but have been unsuccessful. Please, help me...    --

Re: ATI Rage 128 Pro 4xAGP

2001-09-13 Thread bill triplett
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 12:11:11PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi all! > I've been trying to get my ATI Rage 128 Pro 4xAGP (32MB RAM) to > work with X, but have been unsuccessful. Please, help me... Hi, I have an ATI all in wonder rage 128 Pro AGP (32MB) and it is working fine. What probl

Re: ATI Rage 128 virtual screen

2001-05-18 Thread Dana J . Laude
On Fri, 18 May 2001 18:07:24 Martin WHEELER wrote: > [Please cc responses direct, as not subscribed to list] > > Can any of you good folks help me out with a correctly configured > XF86Config-4 file, set up for an ATI Rage 128 with 16M of memory, to > give an actual window of 1024x768 on a v

RE: ati rage 128

2001-04-01 Thread James Moody
> Hi, > I'm using an ati rage 128 video card with a 2.4.2 kernel and xfree 4.02 > I'd like to know whch packages or drivers I got to install in order to take > the best of my card, mainly openGL drivers > thanks in advance > fred Hi fred, Here's the steps that I struggled through to get my rage

RE: ati rage 128

2001-03-31 Thread James Moody
> Hi, > I'm using an ati rage 128 video card with a 2.4.2 kernel and xfree 4.02 > I'd like to know whch packages or drivers I got to install in order to take > the best of my card, mainly openGL drivers > thanks in advance > fred Hi fred, Here's the steps that I struggled through to get my rage

Re: ati rage 128

2001-03-31 Thread Mathias
> I'm using an ati rage 128 video card with a 2.4.2 kernel and xfree 4.02 > I'd like to know whch packages or drivers I got to install in order to take > the best of my card, mainly openGL drivers Hi Fred, this is a part of a german magazine (Linux computing) which i read, cause i have the same c

Re: ATI Rage 128 VR (AGP)

1999-11-14 Thread Jean-Yves BARBIER
On Sun, Nov 14, 1999 at 04:17:09PM +0100, Sergey Lishchuk wrote: > Hi > > What X server must I use to make potato work with > ATI Rage 128 VR (AGP) video card? VGA16 works, but > I need larger resolution. SVGA does not work. I tried > to install manually the SUSE package XFCom_Rage128, > but unsu