Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 11 May 2010 10:06:46 -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 11 May 2010 09:56:49 -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
(...)
There are still minor issues with 64bit desktops. For example, Adobe's
64bit flash player does not
On Tue, 11 May 2010 11:28:00 -0700, Kelly Clowers wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:48, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Tue, 11 May 2010 12:26:21 -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
>>
Users having problems with flash plugin on their 64 bits OS can
install a 32 bits browser and run the 32 bits plugin
Aaron Toponce wrote:
> On 5/11/2010 10:19 AM, James Zuelow wrote:
>> Huh. I'm jealous. I've been running 64 bit Lenny and Squeeze for the
>> past three years or so. When I moved to the 64 bit flash plugin, it
>> would crash Iceweasel on a regular basis. No watching videos required --
>> just a
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:48, Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 12:26:21 -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
>
>>> Users having problems with flash plugin on their 64 bits OS can install
>>> a 32 bits browser and run the 32 bits plugin, which is annoying but it
>>> should work.
>>>
>>>
>> Does thi
> 1/ Firefox can be downloaded from Mozilla site (and Mozilla does not
> provide a 64-bit version for their browser, only 32-bit binaries). Once
> downloaded, no need to install anything, just click and run. Then, you
> can download the flash plugin (32 bits) and store it under Firefox
> plugins fo
On 5/11/2010 10:19 AM, James Zuelow wrote:
> Huh. I'm jealous. I've been running 64 bit Lenny and Squeeze for the past
> three years or so. When I moved to the 64 bit flash plugin, it would crash
> Iceweasel on a regular basis. No watching videos required -- just a flash
> advertisement on a
On Tue, 11 May 2010 12:26:21 -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
>> Users having problems with flash plugin on their 64 bits OS can install
>> a 32 bits browser and run the 32 bits plugin, which is annoying but it
>> should work.
>>
>>
> Does this work natively or does it require a chroot?
Natively...
> Users having problems with flash plugin on their 64 bits OS can install a
> 32 bits browser and run the 32 bits plugin, which is annoying but it
> should work.
>
Does this work natively or does it require a chroot?
Sorry if this is a duplicate, I got a bounce back from the first time
I attempte
> Users having problems with flash plugin on their 64 bits OS can install a
> 32 bits browser and run the 32 bits plugin, which is annoying but it
> should work.
>
Does this work natively or does it require a chroot?
--
Jordan Metzmeier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.de
> user (I don't waste my time with flash games, watching flash videos on
> every corner of the Internet, etc), but I've never, ever had a problem
> running a 100% 64-bit Debian GNU/Linux operating system for the past
> year or so. _ZERO_ issues.
>
Huh. I'm jealous. I've been running 64 bit Len
On 5/11/2010 9:05 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> Any other failing site that can be tested by the mere non-US mortals? :-)
I've been running 64-bit for years, initially with a 32-bit browser and
plugin, but now since Adobe announced the 64-bit plugin, I've never run
into any issues. Granted, I live in the
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 09:23 AM, deloptes wrote:
>> Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
>>
--
Camaleón
>>>
>>> http://hulu.com is an example. AFAIK its only available to people with
>>> U.S. IPs.
>>>
>>
>> I'm in europe and it's working fine, though it said that it can not show
>> v
On Tue, 11 May 2010 11:27:14 -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>> Any other failing site that can be tested by the mere non-US mortals?
>> :-)
>>
>>
>>
> Not that I know of. Doing a google search, it looks like hulu may be the
> only issue. I had p
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 10:06:46 -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>>> On Tue, 11 May 2010 09:56:49 -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
>>>
>>> (...)
>>>
There are still minor issues with 64bit desk
On Tue, 11 May 2010 10:06:46 -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Tue, 11 May 2010 09:56:49 -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
>>
>> (...)
>>
>>> There are still minor issues with 64bit desktops. For example, Adobe's
>>> 64bit flash player does not f
On 05/11/2010 09:23 AM, deloptes wrote:
Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
--
Camaleón
http://hulu.com is an example. AFAIK its only available to people with
U.S. IPs.
I'm in europe and it's working fine, though it said that it can not show
video because of 64bit limitation on linux.
"Unable to s
On 05/11/2010 05:23 PM, deloptes wrote:
Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
--
Camaleón
http://hulu.com is an example. AFAIK its only available to people with
U.S. IPs.
I'm in europe and it's working fine, though it said that it can not show
video because of 64bit limitation on linux.
Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
>> --
>> Camaleón
>>
>
> http://hulu.com is an example. AFAIK its only available to people with
> U.S. IPs.
>
I'm in europe and it's working fine, though it said that it can not show
video because of 64bit limitation on linux.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 09:56:49 -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
>
> (...)
>
>> There are still minor issues with 64bit desktops. For example,
>> Adobe's 64bit flash player does not function on all the sites that the
>> 32bit plugin will.
>
> First ti
19 matches
Mail list logo