pci-scan is in the net portion of the installation. Look down the list
of ethernet drivers and you should see it. I have been using it purely
pragmatically as it was required from linksys and from some of the scyld
drivers.
Art
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 05:42:17PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Tue,
Ron Johnson said:
> On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 13:50, nate wrote:
>> Stephen Gran said:
>>
>> > It's a kernel module. Definitely in the later 2.2 series, don't
>> rememebr if it's also in 2.4
>>
>> I think it's only included with donald becker's drivers(not with the
>> official kernel). I think he uses
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 11:51, user list wrote:
> We have recently had similar behavior. However, we found that even
> though the we received installation failed messages, it actually worked.
> During the device driver configuration step, are you also installoing
> pci-scan? When I did this on a rece
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 13:50, nate wrote:
> Stephen Gran said:
>
> > It's a kernel module. Definitely in the later 2.2 series, don't rememebr
> > if it's also in 2.4
>
> I think it's only included with donald becker's drivers(not with the official
> kernel). I think he uses it to improve code port
Stephen Gran said:
> It's a kernel module. Definitely in the later 2.2 series, don't rememebr
> if it's also in 2.4
I think it's only included with donald becker's drivers(not with the official
kernel). I think he uses it to improve code portability between 2.0, 2.2 and
2.4 kernels.
donald's dri
This one time, at band camp, Ron Johnson said:
> On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 11:51, user list wrote:
> > We have recently had similar behavior. However, we found that even
> > though the we received installation failed messages, it actually worked.
> > During the device driver configuration step, are you
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 11:51, user list wrote:
> We have recently had similar behavior. However, we found that even
> though the we received installation failed messages, it actually worked.
> During the device driver configuration step, are you also installoing
> pci-scan? When I did this on a rece
We have recently had similar behavior. However, we found that even
though the we received installation failed messages, it actually worked.
During the device driver configuration step, are you also installoing
pci-scan? When I did this on a recent install, the apparent failure
vanished.
Art Edward
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 12:57:30PM -0200, Ariane Machado Lima wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have installed the Debian 3.0, which hasn't recognized my NIC
> 3c905c-TX. Then I download the 3c90x drive, but I am suffering with a
> lot of compilation errors. Has somebody tried do that? Has so
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 09:57, Ariane Machado Lima wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have installed the Debian 3.0, which hasn't recognized my NIC
> 3c905c-TX. Then I download the 3c90x drive, but I am suffering with a
> lot of compilation errors. Has somebody tried do that? Has somebody some
>
Ariane Machado Lima wrote:
Hello,
I have installed the Debian 3.0, which hasn't recognized my NIC
3c905c-TX. Then I download the 3c90x drive, but I am suffering with a
lot of compilation errors. Has somebody tried do that? Has somebody some
idea about my problem?
Thank's
Ari
"F.P. Groeneveld" wrote:
> Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> : # /etc/init.d/network
> : SIOCSIFFLAGS: No such device
> : SIOCADDRT: Network is unreachable
>
> I _think_ this is just the new networking code in the newer kernel. Old
> syntax ifconfig/routing commands generate thes
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
> Galbra >So I decided to try the 3c90x driver from 3Com, but it doesn't
> Galbra >work for me. I compiled a module and get this when I load it:
>
> i always have statically compiled the driver into my kernel i dont kn
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
Galbra >So I decided to try the 3c90x driver from 3Com, but it doesn't
Galbra >work for me. I compiled a module and get this when I load it:
i always have statically compiled the driver into my kernel i dont know if
that makes a difference, what kind
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: # /etc/init.d/network
: SIOCSIFFLAGS: No such device
: SIOCADDRT: Network is unreachable
I _think_ this is just the new networking code in the newer kernel. Old
syntax ifconfig/routing commands generate these, I seem to recall. Anypne?
Cheers,
D
The 3c59x module works for me, but I keep getting errors like
this logged:
eth0: Transmit error, Tx status register 82
So I decided to try the 3c90x driver from 3Com, but it doesn't
work for me. I compiled a module and get this when I load it:
# insmod 3c90x
Using /lib/modules/2.2.15/net/3c90
On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 02:06:52PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> eth0: Transmit error, Tx status register 82.
>
> Anything to worry about?
We were seeing this on a RedHat 6.2 machine with an Intel EEPro100 here
at work the other day. Changed out the cable and it stopped doing it.
(And meas
Thanks guys...
"W. Paul Mills" wrote:
> Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> : I got the 3Com 3C905C-TXM last week in
> : a new Dell computer.
>
> :> The 3c59x module that comes with the standard kernel did not do
> :> 100mbit/s full duplex connections f
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: "Christian Pernegger" wrote:
:> I'm running a box with a 3Com 3C905C-TXM, at the moment with
:> potato-testcycle-3 and kernel version 2.2.15.
: Same here, more or less. I got the 3Com 3C905C-TXM last week in
: a new Dell computer.
:> The 3c59x m
"Christian Pernegger" wrote:
> I'm running a box with a 3Com 3C905C-TXM, at the moment with
> potato-testcycle-3 and kernel version 2.2.15.
Same here, more or less. I got the 3Com 3C905C-TXM last week in
a new Dell computer.
> The 3c59x module that comes with the standard kernel did not do
>
On 1, aug, 2000 at 07:39:07 -0600, Gary Hennigan wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > [1 ]
> > Gary Hennigan wrote:
> [snip]
> > > Also, you should seriously consider looking at the kernel-package
> > > package, in particular look at the make-kpkg utility. It makes using
> > > custom-compile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> [1 ]
> Gary Hennigan wrote:
[snip]
> > Also, you should seriously consider looking at the kernel-package
> > package, in particular look at the make-kpkg utility. It makes using
> > custom-compiled kernels in Debian MUCH easier to deal with.
> >
> > To use it you just
Gary Hennigan wrote:
> "Gary Hennigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Raphael Crawford-Marks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > ok so I patched the kernel successfully and went through make config and
> > > make dep just fine.
> > >
> > > when I do make bzImage (also tried zImage, zdisk, and bzd
"Gary Hennigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Raphael Crawford-Marks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ok so I patched the kernel successfully and went through make config and
> > make dep just fine.
> >
> > when I do make bzImage (also tried zImage, zdisk, and bzdisk) everything
> > works fine un
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000 13:16:58 PDT, "Raphael Crawford-Marks" writes:
>as86 -0 -a -o bootsect.o bootsect.s
>make[1]: as86: Command not found
you´ll need the bin86-package
>I've never heard of as86...couldn't find any packages by that name either.
finding packages by filename is easiest via
http:/
"Raphael Crawford-Marks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ok so I patched the kernel successfully and went through make config and
> make dep just fine.
>
> when I do make bzImage (also tried zImage, zdisk, and bzdisk) everything
> works fine until it gets to the very end:
>
> as86 -0 -a -o bootsect
debian.org
Subject: RE: 3c90x woes
Importance: Low
I'm running a box with a 3Com 3C905C-TXM, at the moment with
potato-testcycle-3
and kernel version 2.2.15.
The 3c59x module that comes with the standard kernel did not do 100mbit/s
full duplex
connections for me. 3Coms own 3c90x module does, so
3c905Cs require updated drivers if your REALLY LUCKY you can get the
default kernel driver to work although it most likely will say ***
INVALID CHECKSUM ***
best to get the drivers from www.3com.com (my reccomendation)
the detection logged by the kernel is as follows:
3Com 3c90x Version 1.0.0d 1
> Hmm. Well that didn't work for me. I wish it did...I don't care if I only
> get 10 Mb/s. But everytime I tried the 3c59x Vortex driver the system would
> crash and I'd have to do a hard reboot. Did you use any special options to
> make it work?
Nope, and I didn't compile as a module. Here is
what i do:
download the kernel source from ftp.kernel.org
download the 3com driver from www.3com.com
inside the 3com driver is a kernel patch , i believe its called path-2.2.5
or something, it works fine up to 2.2.16(what im using). patch the kernel
by copying the file to the source tree (usuall
Christoph Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 4:15 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: 3c90x woes
> I've installed Potato on a machine with a 3c905c-TXM PCI card. I tried to
> get it to work with the 3c59x module, to no avail. [...]
I'm using the
> I've installed Potato on a machine with a 3c905c-TXM PCI card. I tried to
> get it to work with the 3c59x module, to no avail. [...]
I'm using the Vortex driver from the standard kernel compilation menu,
and it seems to be working nicely; on the other hand, the rest of the
net is 10Mb/s, so I c
I'm running a box with a 3Com 3C905C-TXM, at the moment with
potato-testcycle-3
and kernel version 2.2.15.
The 3c59x module that comes with the standard kernel did not do 100mbit/s
full duplex
connections for me. 3Coms own 3c90x module does, so I believe it to be
better :)
Of the ways described i
Raphael Crawford-Marks wrote:
> I've installed Potato on a machine with a 3c905c-TXM PCI card. I tried to
> get it to work with the 3c59x module, to no avail. Downloaded 3com's 3c90x
> driver from their site, but couldn't figure out what to do with it (their
> readme said to run install3c90x, a
The Linux kernel already has support for this card, use the 3c590/3c900
series driver.
Nate
On Wed, 18 Mar 1998, Veselin Tabakov wrote:
> Hi,
> I have new 3C90X network adapter but I haven't drivers for this card.
> I'm try to write module for this card but this is a very stupid
> idea.
> If an
The 3C59X driver supports _both_ the 3COM Vortex cards and the Boomerang
cards which is your 3c90x. It also happens to be the one I have. :)
You can get the latest driver from:
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/
Have fun.
-Ossama
___
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have new 3C90X network adapter but I haven't drivers for this card.
>
Use the 3c59x ("Vortex") driver - it works fine.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
37 matches
Mail list logo
