Hello
Paul E Condon (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I have a set of CDs for 30r1 (woody) on i386.
> I see in dselect that there are several packages that
> use the 2.4.18 kernel. I have a classic pentium, which
> seems to referred to as i586. There seem to be two
> packages that provide kernel-ima
> > 3. I have the defrag utility. How can I defragment my Linux partition,
> > since a mounted drive cannot be defragmented?
>
> Well, one way is to unmount the partition (umount /zip , f.e) and defrag
> it. If its a /usr or /, then if you really wan to defrag it, then you have
> to do some more w
1. [snip]
> 2. My distribution doesn't make some device files, such as /dev/modem,
> /dev/audio, /dev/mixer, /dev/sndstat (I cannot use my SoundBlaster PCI
> 64,
> and I use my modem with device file /dev/ttyS1 directly). How can I
> workaround this?
Those devices, some of htem, are just sym
José María Pongilioni López writes:
> I use my modem with device file /dev/ttyS1 directly). How can I
> workaround this?
Don't. You should use /dev/ttyS1 directly: /dev/modem is a bad idea (and
it isn't a device file: it's just a link to /dev/ttyS1).
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler
On Sat, 1 Apr 2000, José María Pongilioni López <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi! I'm a Debian Linux 2.1 'slink' user, and I have 3 questions:
>
>1. I have compiled the version 2.2.4-intl of Linux Kernel and, at boot
>time, my screen shows the following message:
>SIOCADDRT: Invalid argument
>
>
Thanks a lot Scott. Now it's much clearer.
Dennis
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Ellis [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 1998 1:36 PM
> To: Dennis Dai
> Cc: Debian User list
> Subject: Re: 3 questions
>
> On Wed, 10 Jun 199
On Wed, 10 Jun 1998, Dennis Dai wrote:
> 1. What's the difference between hamm (frozen) and slink?
Slink will eventually become Debian 2.1. It contains those packages which
either aren't ready for prime time yet, or which contain additional
features past the freeze date of Debian 2.0.
> 2. Wher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bjoern Starke) writes:
> 1.) i can`t find a file called 'man.config' on my debian 1.2.6. So
> what should i do? (i need it for configuration stuff)
There doesn't seem to be one. But dpkg -L man suggests
/etc/manpath.config.
> 2.) Normal users (members of the group 'ppp') shou
On Mon, 17 Jun 1996, Mark Phillips wrote:
> It really is empty!! I'll paste in what I did:
>
> # pwd
> /proc/3
> # ls
> /usr/bin/color-ls: exe: No such file or directory
> /usr/bin/color-ls: root: No such file or directory
> /usr/bin/color-ls: cwd: No such file or directory
> cmdline environ f
>On Mon, 17 Jun 1996, Mark Phillips wrote:
>
>> >Maybe - do this on a running tcsh whose pid is xxx:
>> >
>> >cat /proc/xxx/environ | xargs -0n1 | grep '^TERM='
>> >
>> >to see what tcsh was passed as the TERM. It should be the same in the
>> >actual shell.
>>
>> I did this - the environ file is
>>One could make the uid of the account zero to achieve this without
>>making pppd setuid, though I can imagine this making people jump up
>>and down about security - can anyone think of an attack on this?
>
>If the user figures a way to change their shell, you're dead.
Quite so. Similarly if th
On Mon, 17 Jun 1996, Mark Phillips wrote:
> >Maybe - do this on a running tcsh whose pid is xxx:
> >
> >cat /proc/xxx/environ | xargs -0n1 | grep '^TERM='
> >
> >to see what tcsh was passed as the TERM. It should be the same in the
> >actual shell.
>
> I did this - the environ file is empty!!!
>On Sun, 16 Jun 1996, Mark Phillips wrote:
>
>> No - I checked, plus I even removed .cshrc and the problem remained.
>> The strange thing is that TERM is set okay for xterms, but not for
>> linux consoles. Could there be a bug in tcsh?
>
>Maybe - do this on a running tcsh whose pid is xxx:
>
>cat
On Sun, 16 Jun 1996, Mark Phillips wrote:
> No - I checked, plus I even removed .cshrc and the problem remained.
> The strange thing is that TERM is set okay for xterms, but not for
> linux consoles. Could there be a bug in tcsh?
Maybe - do this on a running tcsh whose pid is xxx:
cat /proc/xxx
Thanks for your help.
>> When bash is the login shell for a user, it
>> seems that TERM gets set to linux when logging in from the console.
>> But when I changed my shell to tcsh, TERM no longer gets set to linux
>> as it should. Why?
>
>Perhaps your .tcshrc or .cshrc is messing with it.
No - I
On Sun, 16 Jun 1996, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
> >>good question. and why isn't pppd setuid root? if it's a security issue,
> >>a ppp group would be in order.
> >
>
> Personally I find that the diald package is an excellent way of
> avoiding this whole issue. However:
>
i've been using kerne
On Sun, 16 Jun 1996, Mark Phillips wrote:
> 1. How does TERM get set?
TERM is set from the kernel in init/main.c to linux. init, login, et
al, propagaate it.
> When bash is the login shell for a user, it
> seems that TERM gets set to linux when logging in from the console.
> But when I changed
>>good question. and why isn't pppd setuid root? if it's a security issue,
>>a ppp group would be in order.
>
>I'd say 'because it doesn't neeed to be' is a good justification.
>
>If you need to have non-root users execute ppp as root, take a look
>at the 'sudo' or 'super' packages. They allow yo
On Sun, 16 Jun 1996, Jeffery S. Coy Jr. wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Jun 1996, Mark Phillips wrote:
>
> good question. and why isn't pppd setuid root? if it's a security issue,
> a ppp group would be in order.
I'd say 'because it doesn't neeed to be' is a good justification.
If you need to have non-ro
On Sun, 16 Jun 1996, Mark Phillips wrote:
> 1. How does TERM get set?
>
it is set by login(1).
> P.S. Is there any advantage to using bash instead of tcsh? Does bash
> have all the features that tcsh has?
>
well, being a LONG time tcsh user, no, bash can't do everything tcsh does.
tcsh can do
20 matches
Mail list logo
