Dan Ritter wrote:
The web browser technology called WebRTC does that quite well,
but for security reasons -- nobody wants a self-perpetuating
worm -- you need an intermediary device to introduce the two
participants but not to actually transfer the file.
And so there is snapdrop.net, which you c
Michael Grant wrote:
...
> I have long been plagued by the problem if sitting in a room or on a
> boat with someone, 2 devices right next to one another, and no trivially
> easy way to send a file from one device to the other without say first
> uploading it to some mutual third party (e.g. what
I use sshfs, works great to let me drop files on my server from my
desktop. But I wouldn't call that "file sharing". I probably would call
that a "network disk" or "remote mount".
There's probably some formal definition out there, but when I think of
file sharing, I think of someone profferin
I have the ATI Radeon Mobility 9000, is yours the mobility? (in a laptop)
If so, don't bother trying to get any XConfigurator to know about it, it's
still too new.
I am using frame buffers.
Mine's on a powerpc, so I do have different issues, but I definitely had to
build my own kernel (for my 1G
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 10:41:26AM +, Vanilla wrote:
> 1)
> I bought a new server with an ati 9000, an in the instalation I selected
> the "ATI Radeon" an no Frame-Buffer.
> The XF86Config-4 indicate the driver is "ati".
> I can't start X.
> I have another box with an mga and I can't use Frame
Vanilla wrote:
1)
I bought a new server with an ati 9000, an in the instalation I selected
the "ATI Radeon" an no Frame-Buffer.
The XF86Config-4 indicate the driver is "ati".
I can't start X.
I have another box with an mga and I can't use Frame-Buffer too, if i
try to use frame-buffer I can't st
6 matches
Mail list logo
