Re: [s...@svenhartge.de: Re: mutt attachment error]

2016-05-13 Thread Brian
On Fri 13 May 2016 at 12:01:02 -0400, Haines Brown wrote: [...snip...] > > WARNING WARNING WARNING^MESC[9d# This file was generated dynamically > > from^MESC[10d# split config files in the /etc/exim4/conf.d/ [...snip...] > I didn't understand the reference here to split configuration. I checke

Re: Bug#806858 Re: s-nail: mailx: Unable to (dot) lock mailbox, aborting operation: Permission denied

2015-12-30 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Rick Thomas wrote: |On Dec 30, 2015, at 3:36 AM, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: |> Rick Thomas wrote: |>|Hi Steffan, |> |> (My name is Steffen) | |Ooops! Sorry! Don't worry, i had so many typos myself in what followed.. .. |> It must be SETUID to a super-user that can impersonate as all

Re: Bug#806858 Re: s-nail: mailx: Unable to (dot) lock mailbox, aborting operation: Permission denied

2015-12-30 Thread Rick Thomas
On Dec 30, 2015, at 9:51 AM, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote: > Steffen Nurpmeso wrote on 12/30/15 12:36: >> Hello! >> >> Rick Thomas wrote: > > >> |-rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 10104 Dec 4 14:52 /usr/lib/s-nail/s-nail-privsep > > Wouldn't these be enough rights for mailx to do it's work? > I.e., ow

Re: Bug#806858 Re: s-nail: mailx: Unable to (dot) lock mailbox, aborting operation: Permission denied

2015-12-30 Thread Rick Thomas
On Dec 30, 2015, at 3:36 AM, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > Hello! > > Rick Thomas wrote: > |Hi Steffan, > > (My name is Steffen) Ooops! Sorry! > Well, just as already shown in this thread, on my local box it is > > ?0[sdaoden@wales nail.git]$ ll /usr/local/libexec/s-nail-privsep > -r-sr-xr-

Re: Bug#806858 Re: s-nail: mailx: Unable to (dot) lock mailbox, aborting operation: Permission denied

2015-12-30 Thread Jörg-Volker Peetz
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote on 12/30/15 12:36: > Hello! > > Rick Thomas wrote: > |-rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 10104 Dec 4 14:52 /usr/lib/s-nail/s-nail-privsep Wouldn't these be enough rights for mailx to do it's work? I.e., owner: root, group: mail, sticky bit for the group? This works on my syste

Re: Bug#806858 Re: s-nail: mailx: Unable to (dot) lock mailbox, aborting operation: Permission denied

2015-12-30 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Hello! Rick Thomas wrote: |Hi Steffan, (My name is Steffen) |So what, exactly, are the correct permissions for s-nail-privsep? | |Should it be: |-rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 10104 Dec 4 14:52 /usr/lib/s-nail/s-nail-privsep |or: |-rwsr-xr-x 1 root mail 10104 Dec 4 14:52 /usr/lib/s-nai

Bug#806858 Re: s-nail: mailx: Unable to (dot) lock mailbox, aborting operation: Permission denied

2015-12-29 Thread Rick Thomas
Hi Steffan, So what, exactly, are the correct permissions for s-nail-privsep? Should it be: -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 10104 Dec 4 14:52 /usr/lib/s-nail/s-nail-privsep or: -rwsr-xr-x 1 root mail 10104 Dec 4 14:52 /usr/lib/s-nail/s-nail-privsep or: -rwsr-sr-x 1 root mail 10104 Dec 4 14:

Re: s-nail fails with "Unable to (dot) lock mailbox, aborting operation: Permission denied"

2015-12-28 Thread Rick Thomas
On Dec 28, 2015, at 2:31 AM, Rick Thomas wrote: > With recent Stretch installations the “mail” (or “mailx”) command is > satisfied by the s-nail package. > As it comes fresh out of the box, s-nail has a problem with dotlock files. > For example: > >> rbthomas@half:~$ mail >> Creating dotlock

Re: S-Video on ThinkPad T42 with Debian Jessie - can't get above 800x600

2014-04-13 Thread Chris Angelico
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 1:27 AM, Joe wrote: > I did wonder what was going on, because as far as I knew S-Video is > defined only for PAL and NTSC, 576i/50 and 480i/60 in modern > terminology. The point of it is that analogue luminance and chrominance > are carried on separate channels, thus avoidi

Re: S-Video on ThinkPad T42 with Debian Jessie - can't get above 800x600

2014-04-13 Thread Joe
On Sun, 13 Apr 2014 20:57:46 +1000 Chris Angelico wrote: > On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Chris Angelico > wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:50 AM, Chris Angelico > > wrote: > >> I've just converted a laptop from Windows XP to Debian Jessie, with > >> the expectation that I'd be able to d

Re: S-Video on ThinkPad T42 with Debian Jessie - can't get above 800x600

2014-04-13 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:50 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: >> I've just converted a laptop from Windows XP to Debian Jessie, with >> the expectation that I'd be able to do everything at least as well as >> before. That's been mostly true, but

Re: S-Video on ThinkPad T42 with Debian Jessie - can't get above 800x600

2014-04-12 Thread Chris Angelico
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:50 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: > I've just converted a laptop from Windows XP to Debian Jessie, with > the expectation that I'd be able to do everything at least as well as > before. That's been mostly true, but I'm stuck on a problem with the > S-Video output: whatever I

Re: [s...@hardwarefreak.com: Re: Help with KVM/libvirt/win2008r2. Guest loosing time.]

2012-08-10 Thread William Thompson
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:25:14AM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: > On 8/6/2012 2:46 PM, Chris Davies wrote: > > Stan Hoeppner wrote: > >> This would be much simpler if the Windows scheduler had more > >> granularity. You can only schedule per day or greater. AFAIK you can't > >> schedule events

RE: .s

2012-02-29 Thread 4352191442
Hi -- == This mobile text message is brought to you by AT&T -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debi

Re: S-Video on Debian

2011-08-03 Thread Kumar Appaiah
Dear Brian, On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 01:39:40PM +0100, Brian wrote: > The changelog for xserver-xorg-video-intel documents bug fixes for > TV-OUT made a few years ago. Nothing else since. > > > mode: NTSC-M > > supported: NTSC-M NTSC-443 NTSC-J PAL-M

Re: S-Video on Debian

2011-08-02 Thread Brian
On Mon 01 Aug 2011 at 20:03:52 -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > Well, this didn't really send the computer screen to the TV. I'll > proceed to the debugging information. xrandr --output TV1 --same-as LVDS --mode 800x600 may be an alternative command to use. Replace 'LVDS' with whatever your act

Re: S-Video on Debian

2011-08-01 Thread Kumar Appaiah
Dear Brian, Thanks for helping me out. On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 08:04:50PM +0100, Brian wrote: > On Sun 31 Jul 2011 at 20:33:33 -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > > > Here's what I have: > > > > TV1 connected 800x600+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) > > 0mm x 0mm > >848x4803

Re: S-Video on Debian

2011-08-01 Thread Brian
On Sun 31 Jul 2011 at 20:33:33 -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > Here's what I have: > > TV1 connected 800x600+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) > 0mm x 0mm >848x48030.0 + >640x48030.0 + >1024x768 30.0 >800x60030.0*60.3 This tells yo

Re: S-Video on Debian

2011-07-31 Thread Kumar Appaiah
Dear Brian, On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10:47:30PM +0100, Brian wrote: > > When I connect an S-Video cable to the television, I am able to see > > the settings on the KDE Display Applet, and can configure it. However, > > no output manages to get through to the television. > > This is what I do. > >

Re: S-Video on Debian

2011-07-31 Thread Brian
On Sun 31 Jul 2011 at 14:58:04 -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > I have an S-Video cable which I'd like to connect to a TV. It works on > a friends laptop with Windows. On Debian I have: > > xserver-xorg 1:7.6+7 > xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.15.0-3 > KDE 4.6.2 > > When I connect an S-Video cable t

Re: (S)ATA exceptions, disk frozen

2007-05-09 Thread Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
On 4/17/07, Gebhardt Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, we have about 60 opteron servers running sarge amd64 with a 2.6.20.3 vanilla kernel (previously they were running 2.6.18.1; I installed the newer kernel in the hope that the problem would disappear). At a rate of about 1-2 per week the

Re: (S)ATA exceptions, disk frozen

2007-04-17 Thread Kevin Mark
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:06:23AM +0200, Gebhardt Thomas wrote: > Hi, > > we have about 60 opteron servers running sarge amd64 with a > 2.6.20.3 vanilla kernel (previously they were running 2.6.18.1; > I installed the newer kernel in the hope that the problem would disappear). > > At a rate of a

Re: s-video out, Dell nvidia laptop?

2007-02-09 Thread Don Hayward
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Curt Howland wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 09 February 2007 12:02, you wrote: # TV Out Setup � � � � �Option � � �"TVStandard" "NTSC" � � � � �Option � � �"TVOutFormat" "SVIDEO" � � � � �Option � � �"TVOverScan" "0.6" � � � � �Option � � �"C

Re: s-video out, Dell nvidia laptop?

2007-02-09 Thread Curt Howland
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 09 February 2007 12:02, you wrote: > # TV Out Setup >          Option      "TVStandard" "NTSC" >          Option      "TVOutFormat" "SVIDEO" >          Option      "TVOverScan" "0.6" >          Option      "ConnectedMonitor" "TV" Hi, I'm ver

Re: s-video out, Dell nvidia laptop?

2007-02-09 Thread Don Hayward
Thanks Evan, On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Evan wrote: Can we have more details as to what you've already done? Has your problem produced any error messages? On 2/8/07, Don Hayward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have a Dell Inspiron 8200 laptop with Geforce4 440 Go graphics. I need instruction for gett

Re: s-video out, Dell nvidia laptop?

2007-02-08 Thread Evan
Can we have more details as to what you've already done? Has your problem produced any error messages? On 2/8/07, Don Hayward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have a Dell Inspiron 8200 laptop with Geforce4 440 Go graphics. I need instruction for getting the s-video port to work. I've googled a lo

Re: s-bit [solved]

2006-04-28 Thread John Smith
Asking around on #debian solved this: a shell script can't run as another user because the actual executable that get's loaded is the shell and not the script. It seems that perl does honour the s-bit on a perl-script. Sincerely, Jan. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wit

Re: S-ATA HDD unter Debian

2006-03-14 Thread Matt Zagrabelny
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 06:24:13PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:08:03 +0100 (MET) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Thanks so far. > > > > So my chipset is the following: > > > > NVIDIA nForce4 SLI and Silicon Image 3114R RAID controller. > > > > I know that there is a w

Re: S-ATA HDD unter Debian

2006-03-14 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:08:03 +0100 (MET) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thanks so far. > > So my chipset is the following: > > NVIDIA nForce4 SLI and Silicon Image 3114R RAID controller. > > I know that there is a way to make a S-ATA hdd work in Linux but i just > know it from suse linux (a friend

Re: S-ATA HDD unter Debian

2006-03-14 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 13:10:00 +0100 (MET) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hallo > > Mein Prob is das ich Debian gern auf einer S-ATA-Platte zum laufen bringen > will, ich aber nich weiß ob und ab welchem Release Debian von Haus aus > S-ATA-Platten unterstützt. > > Hatte es schon einmal probiert, aller

Re: S/MIME support in Emai clients

2004-06-14 Thread chris-usenet
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, "Luis R. Rojas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked: > is thunderbir in the apt-get or aptitude tree? Nicos Gollan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is in testing (0.5) and unstable (0.6). It's also on backports.org if you're running stable. Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO

Re: Latin [was: Re: S/MIME support in Emai clients]

2004-06-06 Thread richard lyons
On Saturday 05 June 2004 18:47, Pigeon wrote: > On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 04:43:18PM -0400, Luis R. Rojas wrote: > > -- > > sic transit gloria fenestrae > > s/ae/arum/ I knew that looked wrong, but didn't stop to think. Go to the top of the class, Pigeon. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT

Latin [was: Re: S/MIME support in Emai clients]

2004-06-05 Thread Pigeon
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 04:43:18PM -0400, Luis R. Rojas wrote: > > -- > sic transit gloria fenestrae s/ae/arum/ -- Pigeon Be kind to pigeons Get my GPG key here: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x21C61F7F pgpkNZLw19qoc.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: S/MIME support in Emai clients

2004-06-05 Thread Bob Proulx
Luis R. Rojas wrote: > Vineet Kumar said: > > As for recommendations: Mutt is the best mailer I've ever used > > (and by far the most efficient, which is what you asked for) but > > thunderbird looks pretty good if you like a mouse. > > > is thunderbir in the apt-get or aptitude tree? mine says it

Re: S/MIME support in Emai clients

2004-06-03 Thread Paul Johnson
Vineet Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Robert Golovniov ([EMAIL PROTECTED])[20040603 02:43]: >> Hello, >> >> Could anybody, please, suggest me what is the most efficient mail >> client under Linux from the viewpoint of handling S/MIME? > > Though I'm not using S/MIME, afaik both mutt

Re: S/MIME support in Emai clients

2004-06-03 Thread Nicos Gollan
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004 16:43:18 -0400 (AST) "Luis R. Rojas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > is thunderbir in the apt-get or aptitude tree? mine says it couldnt > find it? in case it isnt. can you install manually? It is in testing (0.5) and unstable (0.6). -- Got Backup? Jabber: Shadowdancer at jabbe

Re: S/MIME support in Emai clients

2004-06-03 Thread David P James
On Thu 3 June 2004 16:43, Luis R. Rojas wrote: > > is thunderbir in the apt-get or aptitude tree? mine says it couldnt > find it? in case it isnt. can you install manually? # apt-get install mozilla-thunderbird mozilla-thunderbird-enigmail -- David P James Ottawa, Ontario http://david.jamesnet.

Re: S/MIME support in Emai clients

2004-06-03 Thread Luis R. Rojas
Vineet Kumar said: > * Robert Golovniov ([EMAIL PROTECTED])[20040603 02:43]: >> Hello, >> >> Could anybody, please, suggest me what is the most efficient mail >> client under Linux from the viewpoint of handling S/MIME? > > Though I'm not using S/MIME, afaik both mutt and thunderbird > shou

Re: S/MIME support in Emai clients

2004-06-03 Thread Vineet Kumar
* Robert Golovniov ([EMAIL PROTECTED])[20040603 02:43]: > Hello, > > Could anybody, please, suggest me what is the most efficient mail > client under Linux from the viewpoint of handling S/MIME? Though I'm not using S/MIME, afaik both mutt and thunderbird should support it. As for recommen

Re: S/MIME support in Emai clients

2004-06-03 Thread Paul Johnson
Robert Golovniov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Could anybody, please, suggest me what is the most efficient mail > client under Linux from the viewpoint of handling S/MIME? PGP is far more widely used than S/MIME in this day and age in mail and news. I would suggest going that route instead. --

Re: S-ATA med Debian

2003-12-08 Thread Dave Howorth
Bjorn Johansson wrote: Funkar S-ATA diskar med Debian woody? Not with the standard kernel. I'd suggest getting a copy of Knoppix, which hopefully will work, and then use the settings it deduces to figure out what you need to change in Woody. Please use English on the list! Cheers, Dave -- To U

Re: s key stopped working in console and xterm (SOLVED Part 2,sollution inside)

2003-06-09 Thread Benedict Verheyen
Op zo 08-06-2003, om 10:14 schreef Benedict Verheyen: > Hi, > > i tried to change the font used in X (fluxbox on sid) and > played with XFree86Config-4. I changed the order of the > FontPaths there. I also played with the .Xdefaults file > to try and load another font. > After this, my s key di

Re: s key stopped working in console and xterm [SOLVED]

2003-06-09 Thread Benedict Verheyen
Op ma 09-06-2003, om 03:12 schreef Colin Watson: > On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 02:35:09AM +0200, Benedict Verheyen wrote: > > Yes. That was what i was trying to accomplish. > > According to the debian reference guide you can stop > > the beeping by adding set bell-style none to the > > inputrc file. I

Re: s key stopped working in console and xterm [SOLVED]

2003-06-09 Thread Hugh Saunders
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 02:35:09AM +0200, Benedict Verheyen wrote: > Well, i tested this again and it's connected to that line. > I've put the "setterm -blength 0" command in the /etc/inputrc > file, saved and then logged in. My s was gone again. > I removed the line, exit, logged in again. s key w

Re: s key stopped working in console and xterm [SOLVED]

2003-06-08 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 02:35:09AM +0200, Benedict Verheyen wrote: > Op ma 09-06-2003, om 00:55 schreef Hugh Saunders: > > On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 11:24:03PM +0200, Benedict Verheyen wrote: > > > Yes! Woohoo! You da man! > > > I checked my /etc/inputrc file and bingo, there was a > > > setterm -ble

Re: s key stopped working in console and xterm [SOLVED]

2003-06-08 Thread Benedict Verheyen
Op ma 09-06-2003, om 00:55 schreef Hugh Saunders: > On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 11:24:03PM +0200, Benedict Verheyen wrote: > > Yes! Woohoo! You da man! > > I checked my /etc/inputrc file and bingo, there was a > > setterm -blength 0 line in there that caused the s > > to disappear. > surely that just m

Re: s key stopped working in console and xterm [SOLVED]

2003-06-08 Thread Hugh Saunders
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 11:24:03PM +0200, Benedict Verheyen wrote: > Yes! Woohoo! You da man! > I checked my /etc/inputrc file and bingo, there was a > setterm -blength 0 line in there that caused the s > to disappear. surely that just means, that the terminal wont beep? -blength [0-2000] Sets

Re: s key stopped working in console and xterm [SOLVED]

2003-06-08 Thread Benedict Verheyen
Op zo 08-06-2003, om 14:10 schreef John: > On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 10:14:20AM +0200, Benedict Verheyen wrote: > > Hi, > > 1. How did i break the s key and how do i fix it? I have > > knoppix lying around but i have no clue where to search. > > I edited /etc/inputrc a while back, got the syntax wro

Re: s key stopped working in console and xterm

2003-06-08 Thread John
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 10:14:20AM +0200, Benedict Verheyen wrote: > Hi, > 1. How did i break the s key and how do i fix it? I have > knoppix lying around but i have no clue where to search. I edited /etc/inputrc a while back, got the syntax wrong & lost my 's' key. Drove me nuts! John -- To

Re: S/Key passwords with SSH? -- resolved

2002-04-25 Thread Greg Norris
I'm happy to report that I got it working. On the off-chance that someone else is sufficiently brain-damaged to think this is a good idea, here's what I had to do... 1) Install the opie-server and libpam-opie packages. 2) Modify /etc/pam.d/ssh, so that pam_opie.so is invoked in addition to (or

Re: s bit on owner permission for dir

2002-02-08 Thread Carel Fellinger
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 02:15:55PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > I'm a little confused on the what > the s bit does for the owner of a directory. > For example > > drwsr-sr--joe staff /var/www > > I understand that the s bit on the group permission > would make all new fil

Re: S/Key Password prompt using ssh

2002-01-28 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Cameron Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.28.0603 +0100]: > S/Key is a technology for one time passwords (OTP). Basically, you carry > around a little device (that can fit on your keyring, usually), that > generates passwords, in sync with the server you're trying to authenticate > to.

Re: S/Key Password prompt using ssh

2002-01-27 Thread Cameron Kerr
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, Aaron Brashears wrote: >I recently upgraded my workstation to the latest unstable. Then, I >attempted to ssh into a freebsd server I do some work on, but got the >following unusual message: > >otp-md5 128 fl6641 ext >S/Key Password: S/Key is a technology for one time password

RE: S: Sound editor

2001-11-20 Thread Kelley, Tim \(CBS-New Orleans\)
ng. > -Original Message- > From: csj [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 3:28 PM > To: Debian User > Subject: Re: S: Sound editor > > On Tuesday 20 November 2001 02:53, Markus Grunwald wrote: > > Hello ! > > > > Since

Re: S: Sound editor

2001-11-20 Thread csj
On Tuesday 20 November 2001 02:53, Markus Grunwald wrote: > Hello ! > > Since there now is a "multimedia"-Debian distri, I start getting hope > again: is there SOME reasonable sound editor for Linux ? I am > searching since my Linux start (2.0.??) for something as powerful as > Cool Edit but everyt

Re: ^S/scroll-lock in konsole

2001-10-22 Thread Richard Cobbe
Lo, on Monday, October 22, Mark Carroll did write: > On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, 'cduck' Chris Grierson wrote: > > > anyone know what signal ^S sends, and how to unfreeze a konsole when it > > My guess would be SIGSTOP. No. SIGSTOP actually stops (i.e., suspends) the process to which it is sent. (SI

Re: ^S/scroll-lock in konsole

2001-10-22 Thread Matthew Garman
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 03:16:54PM -0400, Mark Carroll wrote: > On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, 'cduck' Chris Grierson wrote: > > it's really frustrating because i often fat-finger ^S when reaching for > > ^A or ^E (which i often use, resulting in far too frequently locked > > sessions). > > You can probably

Re: ^S/scroll-lock in konsole

2001-10-22 Thread Vineet Kumar
* 'cduck' Chris Grierson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [011022 11:56]: > anyone know what signal ^S sends, and how to unfreeze a konsole when it > gets pressed? on one of the system consoles (tty1-6; btw, what is the > proper name for these?), it is effectively a scroll-lock (the scroll- > lock light on the

Re: ^S/scroll-lock in konsole

2001-10-22 Thread Jeffrey W. Baker
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, 'cduck' Chris Grierson wrote: > anyone know what signal ^S sends, and how to unfreeze a konsole when it > gets pressed? on one of the system consoles (tty1-6; btw, what is the > proper name for these?), it is effectively a scroll-lock (the scroll- > lock light on the keyboa

Re: ^S/scroll-lock in konsole

2001-10-22 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 10:35:58AM -0700, 'cduck' Chris Grierson wrote: > anyone know what signal ^S sends, and how to unfreeze a konsole when it > gets pressed? on one of the system consoles (tty1-6; btw, what is the > proper name for these?), it is effectively a scroll-lock (the scroll- > lock l

Re: ^S/scroll-lock in konsole

2001-10-22 Thread Erik Steffl
'cduck' Chris Grierson wrote: > > anyone know what signal ^S sends, and how to unfreeze a konsole when it > gets pressed? on one of the system consoles (tty1-6; btw, what is the try ctrl-q erik

Re: ^S/scroll-lock in konsole

2001-10-22 Thread Mark Carroll
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, 'cduck' Chris Grierson wrote: > anyone know what signal ^S sends, and how to unfreeze a konsole when it My guess would be SIGSTOP. > gets pressed? on one of the system consoles (tty1-6; btw, what is the ^Q usually works for me. (snip) > it's really frustrating because i o

Re: ^S/scroll-lock in konsole

2001-10-22 Thread John Hasler
Chris Grierson writes: > anyone know what signal ^S sends,... ^S is X-OFF. > and how to unfreeze a konsole when it gets pressed? ^Q, which is X-ON. This a FAQ. > on one of the system consoles (tty1-6; btw, what is the > proper name for these?) Virtual consoles. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: ^S/scroll-lock in konsole

2001-10-22 Thread Jesper Holmberg
* On Mon Oct 22, 'cduck' Chris Grierson wrote: > anyone know what signal ^S sends, and how to unfreeze a konsole when it > gets pressed? What signal it sends, I don't know. But to disable it, press ^Q. HTH, Jesper -- Jesper Holmberg|"But how can | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |

Re: 'S' permissions -- in home dir?

2001-01-15 Thread Richard Cobbe
Lo, on Monday, January 15, Thomas J. Hamman did write: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 03:11:53AM -0600, Rob VanFleet wrote: > I have a related question: How come almost every file in my home > directory has s or S permissions set? Even if I change them to x, I > find later on that they have mysteriou

RE: 'S' permissions

2001-01-15 Thread Richard Cobbe
Lo, on Monday, January 15, Fernando Carvajal did write: > it's the suid bit but the file have no execution permission Minor nit, but drw-r-Sr-- is actually the set*gid* bit; setuid would be drwSr--r--. Richard

Re: 'S' permissions -- in home dir?

2001-01-15 Thread Thomas J. Hamman
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 03:11:53AM -0600, Rob VanFleet wrote: > I know what s is, when designated in the permissions of a file, but what > does a capitol 'S' stand for? ie: > > drw-r-Sr-- I have a related question: How come almost every file in my home directory has s or S permissions set? Even

Re: 'S' permissions

2001-01-15 Thread Peter Hugosson-Miller
Rob VanFleet wrote: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 03:34:04AM -0600, Rob VanFleet wrote: > > Why would that exist on a directory one just untarred? > Ugh, never mind about the above, I wasn't thinking. > > Any clues as to why I would not be able to cd into the directory though? You need the 'x' bit se

Re: 'S' permissions

2001-01-15 Thread Rob VanFleet
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 03:34:04AM -0600, Rob VanFleet wrote: > Why would that exist on a directory one just untarred? Ugh, never mind about the above, I wasn't thinking. Any clues as to why I would not be able to cd into the directory though? > I noticed this > right after I untarred a tar.gz an

Re: 'S' permissions

2001-01-15 Thread William T Wilson
On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Rob VanFleet wrote: > I know what s is, when designated in the permissions of a file, but what > does a capitol 'S' stand for? ie: > > drw-r-Sr-- It means the s bit is set, but the x bit is *not* set. Not used very much...

Re: 'S' permissions

2001-01-15 Thread Rob VanFleet
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 10:21:01AM +0100, Fernando Carvajal wrote: > it's the suid bit but the file have no execution permission Why would that exist on a directory one just untarred? I noticed this right after I untarred a tar.gz and was subsequently unable to cd into it, for why I don't know.

RE: 'S' permissions

2001-01-15 Thread Fernando Carvajal
it's the suid bit but the file have no execution permission see http://www.infocom.cqu.edu.au/Archives/Units/1998/Autumn/85321_Systems_Admin istration/Old_Stuff/1997_Website/Communication/Mailing_lists/1997/WWW_Archiv e/March/msg00061.html Regards -Mensaje original- De: Rob VanFleet [m

Re: S/MIME MUA

2000-07-25 Thread Bruce Stephens
"J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 13:17:01 +1000, Brian May wrote: > >> I am actually using mutt but I just discovered that it handle PGP/MIME > >> (rfc2015) and not S/MIME (rfs2633-4). > > > > What is the difference? I thought that there was only one sta

Re: S/MIME MUA

2000-07-25 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 13:17:01 +1000, Brian May wrote: >> I am actually using mutt but I just discovered that it handle PGP/MIME >> (rfc2015) and not S/MIME (rfs2633-4). > > What is the difference? I thought that there was only one standard... The beauty of standards... S/MIME is an older stan

Re: S/MIME MUA

2000-07-24 Thread Brian May
> "Giuseppe" == Giuseppe Sacco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Giuseppe> Hi, I am looking for a Mail User Agent that is able to Giuseppe> show S/MIME messages. I would like to avoid Communicator Giuseppe> Mail since it is in non-free. I am actually using mutt Giuseppe> but I just d

Re: S L O W mailserver

2000-06-17 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 09:42:00AM -0700, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote: > My question is, can I some how trace all tcp/ip traffic to a file when I click > on my mail icon in KDE? Would be nice to start the file just prior to hitting > the button, then end the file folllowing the last message so I can

Re: S L O W mailserver

2000-06-16 Thread Mike Werner
Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a really slow mail server problem. The guy says it shouldn't be > slow but it is. I know he is running Red Hat on all his boxes on this ISP > and don't know which mailserver he uses for POP3. > > My question is, can I some how trace all tcp/i

Re: S L O W mailserver

2000-06-16 Thread Sven Burgener
>I have a really slow mail server problem. The guy says it shouldn't be >slow but it is. I know he is running Red Hat on all his boxes on this ISP >and don't know which mailserver he uses for POP3. On the mail server check whether the MTA is started from inetd. If so, change that to deamon. I noti

Re: S L O W mailserver

2000-06-16 Thread Ernest Johanson
One way you could do this is to run tcpdump set to record packets with either a source or destination adress of the ISP's mail server. Then check your mail. The whole conversation will be recorded with timestamps. Use tee to pipe the output to a file. On Fri, 16 Jun 2000, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote

RE: s...l...o...w... ppp xfers

2000-03-30 Thread Onno
Did you check the MTU setting? For ethernet compatibility it needs to be 1500. Good luck, Onno At 01:25 PM 3/29/00 -0600, Rick Hayter wrote: >> I'm looking for some troubleshooting help. >> Slink is working like a champ in all aspects but ppp connection speed. >> Actually, I connect at high spe

Re: s...l...o...w... ppp xfers

2000-03-30 Thread David Wright
Quoting Rick Hayter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Slink is working like a champ in all aspects but ppp connection speed. > > Actually, I connect at high speeds, but my sustained throughput runs from > > only 200-400 bps! When first downloading, I get a burst of speed, but in > > seconds all activity s

RE: s...l...o...w... ppp xfers

2000-03-29 Thread Rick Hayter
> I'm looking for some troubleshooting help. > Slink is working like a champ in all aspects but ppp connection speed. > Actually, I connect at high speeds, but my sustained throughput runs from > only 200-400 bps! When first downloading, I get a burst of speed, but in > seconds all activity seems

RE: s...l...o...w... ppp xfers

2000-03-29 Thread Rick Hayter
> I'm looking for some troubleshooting help. > Slink is working like a champ in all aspects but ppp connection speed. > Actually, I connect at high speeds, but my sustained throughput runs from > only 200-400 bps! When first downloading, I get a burst of speed, but in > seconds all activity seems

Re: s...l...o...w... ppp xfers

2000-03-24 Thread George Bonser
try: echo 0 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_timestamps If that does not help, try turning off all compression by ppp (header compression and the like) and let only the modem do the compression. On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Rick Hayter wrote: > I'm looking for some troubleshooting help. > Slink is working li

Re: s...l...o...w... ppp xfers

2000-03-22 Thread Robert Mognet
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 10:13:34AM -0600, Rick Hayter wrote: > I'm looking for some troubleshooting help. > Slink is working like a champ in all aspects but ppp connection speed. > Actually, I connect at high speeds, but my sustained throughput runs from > only 200-400 bps! When first downloading,

Re: "S" file permissions

1999-07-21 Thread Buddha Buck
> (Sorry for the non-Debian-specific question.) > > Can someone explain what this execute bit means? > > IOW, what is the difference between "s" (suid) and "S" (?)? > > I've tried irc and one guy said it was something to do with an old SysV > standard. Someone else said it's "super-suid" or sui

Re: "S" file permissions

1999-07-21 Thread Jim B
al Message - From: Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Jim B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Debian-user Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 1999 3:11 PM Subject: Re: "S" file permissions > On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, Jim B wrote: > > > (Sorry for the non-Debian-specific question.) > >

Re: "S" file permissions

1999-07-21 Thread Brad
On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, Jim B wrote: > (Sorry for the non-Debian-specific question.) > > Can someone explain what this execute bit means? > > IOW, what is the difference between "s" (suid) and "S" (?)? > > I've tried irc and one guy said it was something to do with an old SysV > standard. Someone

Re: S/N

1998-11-12 Thread Csaba Csoma - sysadm
> > > (IMHO, maybe CPU, but BIOS for the sake of discussion). LINUX should > > > read (and not "soft" read) a serial number out of the BIOS, and not hold > > > it in software to be hacked. BIOS manufacture might be easier to > > > > Any scheme like this can be hacked. Especially -- but certainly

Re: S/Linux

1997-08-19 Thread Davide Barbieri
Eric Waldman wrote: > Any info available on when debian for the SPARCstations will be > available. I use debian > on all of my pentiums, 486's, and 386's. I have a sparcstation 1 and > Sparc classic and > would like to stick with debian. There is something working. There is a boot disk. Th