On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Charles Kroeger <
ckro...@frankensteinface.com> wrote:
>
>
> You're right Angus, and I did take precautions, that is why I was still
> able
> to post to the newsgroup, however I thought maybe an extra emphasis
> wouldn't
> hurt. I'm not confident that getting the u
> I think I'll just wait for:
>
> aptitude -a amd64 --arch_upgrade
>
> Surely that's right around the corner... Maybe for Squeeze?
>
> :)
>
> James
Damn right, keep a watch on your /etc/dpkg/dpkg.cfg file for an upgrade.
--
C.
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.
> Anyway, I think the huge **WARNING** notes should have been enough to let
> you know the whole thing was not without risk ;)
>
> Regards,
>
> Angus
>
You're right Angus, and I did take precautions, that is why I was still able
to post to the newsgroup, however I thought maybe an extra emphas
I think I'll just wait for:
aptitude -a amd64 --arch_upgrade
Surely that's right around the corner... Maybe for Squeeze?
:)
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://li
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Charles Kroeger <
ckro...@frankensteinface.com> wrote:
> Thanks for all the suggestions.
>
> I had a go with the above site using the powerful command:
>
> #dpkg --force-depends --force-architecture --force-overwrite -i
>
> to install the suggested libs:
>
> ia32-l
> You were already told that a reinstall is most definitely the easiest,
> fastest and safest procedure. But if you want to try it:
>
> http://teddyb.org/~rlpowell/hobbies/debian_arch_up/
Thanks for all the suggestions.
I had a go with the above site using the powerful command:
#dpkg --force-d
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 17:44 -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
> I would hope someone knows a command line solution. Is there a way
> to safely morph the old architecture into the new, like purging the i686
> kernel for instance or configuring APT or dpkg to upgrade with amd64
> versions.
You were a
> However, it has transpired that it wasn't that simple to change from the i686
> kernel to amd64 even though my 32 packages will work under the amd64 kernel
> Apt and Dpkg for instance don't seem to know this has happened.
Others have already answered the "how to move from i386 to amd64", but
I'l
Andrew Sackville-West put forth on 2/27/2010 7:53 PM:
> It's been a while, but as I understand it, there is an -amd64 kernel
> available in the -i686 repos, but that doesn't mean you're running in
> the 64 bit architecture. That requires a number of other things to
> happen, including changing to
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 05:44:46PM -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
[...]
> Before moving an image of the old [i686] partition to the new computer I
> installed the amd64 kernel. I completed the install by using gparted from a
> rescue disk to merge the larger new partition with the old smaller one fr
Hey Boyd,
Putting back the discussion on the list. =)
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. escreveu:
On Sunday 09 November 2008 21:03, Vinicius Massuchetto wrote:
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. escreveu:
Looks like mangle doesn't like the (a) the system it is running on or (b)
your lists of Packages. I'm betting
Sven Joachim escreveu:
On 2008-11-10 02:04 +0100, Vinicius Massuchetto wrote:
Well, then maybe you can help me out here:
vinicius:/home/vinicius# apt-get install ia32-libs-tools
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
ia32-libs-tools is already
On 2008-11-10 02:04 +0100, Vinicius Massuchetto wrote:
> Well, then maybe you can help me out here:
>
> vinicius:/home/vinicius# apt-get install ia32-libs-tools
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> ia32-libs-tools is already the newest ve
Thanks Boyd,
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. escreveu:
On Sunday 09 November 2008 19:04, Vinicius Massuchetto wrote:
Sven Joachim escreveu:
Setting up ia32-libs-tools (11) ...
mangle: ia32-libs-tools/mangle.cc:231: size_t
PkgDepAnd::parse(std::string&, size_t): Assertion `is_name(s[offset])'
failed.
/va
On Sunday 09 November 2008 19:04, Vinicius Massuchetto wrote:
> Sven Joachim escreveu:
> Setting up ia32-libs-tools (11) ...
> mangle: ia32-libs-tools/mangle.cc:231: size_t
> PkgDepAnd::parse(std::string&, size_t): Assertion `is_name(s[offset])'
> failed.
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/ia32-libs-tools.postin
Sven Joachim escreveu:
On 2008-11-09 03:51 +0100, Vinicius Massuchetto wrote:
Sven Joachim escreveu:
On 2008-11-08 17:06 +0100, Vinicius Massuchetto wrote:
Is there any way to build amd64 packages from i386?
There is probably more than one way, but assuming you have a 64-bit
processor (if n
On 2008-11-09 03:51 +0100, Vinicius Massuchetto wrote:
> Sven Joachim escreveu:
>> On 2008-11-08 17:06 +0100, Vinicius Massuchetto wrote:
>>
>>> Is there any way to build amd64 packages from i386?
>>
>> There is probably more than one way, but assuming you have a 64-bit
>> processor (if not, why w
Sven Joachim escreveu:
On 2008-11-08 17:06 +0100, Vinicius Massuchetto wrote:
Is there any way to build amd64 packages from i386?
There is probably more than one way, but assuming you have a 64-bit
processor (if not, why would you want to build packages for it?), the
easiest solution is to bo
On 2008-11-08 17:06 +0100, Vinicius Massuchetto wrote:
> Is there any way to build amd64 packages from i386?
There is probably more than one way, but assuming you have a 64-bit
processor (if not, why would you want to build packages for it?), the
easiest solution is to boot with a 64-bit kernel a
19 matches
Mail list logo
