Re: [off-topic] MS Outlook

1999-12-04 Thread Brian May
> "Keith" == Keith G Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Keith> I just checked out Outlook98, by sending and replying to Keith> messages to myself, and apparently it does not provide Keith> "References" headers. It does do threading of a sort, Keith> apparently by the subject l

Re: [off-topic] MS Outlook

1999-12-04 Thread Kent West
Bart Szyszka wrote: > IMO, [Outlook 2000 is] significantly better (as is the Office > 2k suite entirely, IMO) in performance and features. > Except that Office 2000's setup installs IE and Outlook [Express] even if you don't want them. You can do a minimal install of them, and you can even uninst

Re: [off-topic] MS Outlook

1999-12-03 Thread Steve Lamb
Friday, December 03, 1999, 12:37:09 PM, Bart wrote: > Have you guys gotten Outlook to work in Debian or something? Through WINE? VMWare. ;) > The only reason I don't use it is because I don't have any use for the > reminder/calendar/etc. stuff in Windows because of ICQ99b. Gack. I wish

RE: [off-topic] MS Outlook

1999-12-03 Thread Paul McHale
Bart, > > Have you guys gotten Outlook to work in Debian or something? Through WINE? > If you did I'd like to hear about that. For a second there I > thought I was reading > mail from Microsoft's newsgroups. I checked and don't believe Outlook will run under linux in any fashion. The original foc

Re: [off-topic] MS Outlook

1999-12-03 Thread Bart Szyszka
> > I am not sure there is a way to configure it in Outlook98, which is the > > specific version I have. The RE: has always worked for me. I do know there > > were significant changes from Outlook97 to Outlook98. You suggestion may be > > one of them. Have you guys gotten Outlook to work in Deb

Re: [off-topic] MS Outlook

1999-12-03 Thread Steve Lamb
Friday, December 03, 1999, 11:17:50 AM, Paul wrote: > Ultimately, they are getting off their butts again and the next gen looks > really good. My point: Had they not had such a death grip on the market, > they would have lost serious market share when the other cards caught up/out > paced them.

RE: [off-topic] MS Outlook

1999-12-03 Thread Paul McHale
Keith, > > It is certainly inexcusable for Outlook to ignore References, as well as > not give any option for providing them. MS is the only company I know > of that wants their stuff to not interoperate with others'. But NS > should at least give you a "Terminate Thread" option on reply that wo

Re: [off-topic] MS Outlook

1999-12-03 Thread Keith G. Murphy
Paul McHale wrote: > > Brian, > > > How do you configure MS-Outlook to add the "References" header, so > > that threads will work properly? Or is this a "feature" of a newer > > version of outlook that wasn't in earlier versions? > > > > While I don't use outlook myself, I find it annoying to rec

RE: [off-topic] MS Outlook

1999-12-03 Thread Paul McHale
Brian, > How do you configure MS-Outlook to add the "References" header, so > that threads will work properly? Or is this a "feature" of a newer > version of outlook that wasn't in earlier versions? > > While I don't use outlook myself, I find it annoying to receive > messages from people who do u