On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:26:19 -0400
Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> I think he said Celeron (doesn't that mean slow as celery, i.e.
> low-power?), 256 MB and no swap.
Modern Celerons (I have one, but nothing else modern to compare it to),
i.e. the Celeron M, are apparently
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 14:30 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 09:08:21PM +0100, somethin2cool wrote:
> > Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > >I am curious about your sluggishness though, as I've had xfce running
> > >for days with multiple apps open and problems. Currently
El dom, 29-04-2007 a las 21:26 -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty escribió:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 10:32:17PM +0200, Andreas Janssen wrote:
> > Roberto C. Sánchez (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 09:07:35PM +0100, somethin2cool wrote:
> > >>
> > >> But it isn't handling the me
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 10:32:17PM +0200, Andreas Janssen wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 09:07:35PM +0100, somethin2cool wrote:
> >>
> >> But it isn't handling the memory well. Everything is rubbish and
> >> sluggish right from start-up. Someth
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 09:08:21PM +0100, somethin2cool wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >
> >I am curious about your sluggishness though, as I've had xfce running
> >for days with multiple apps open and problems. Currently I've got 2 or
> >3 terminals, iceweasel, openoffice, xfmedia and gnu
Roberto C. Sánchez (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 09:07:35PM +0100, somethin2cool wrote:
>>
>> But it isn't handling the memory well. Everything is rubbish and
>> sluggish right from start-up. Something is wrong
>>
> well, how much total physical RAM do you have? How much
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 05:00:45PM +0100, somethin2cool wrote:
Nigel Henry wrote:
On Sunday 29 April 2007 16:19, somethin2cool wrote:
even though i'm not running anything.
in processes task manager says i'm using a total of 25mb, inc
dependencies.
in resources,
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 09:07:35PM +0100, somethin2cool wrote:
>
> But it isn't handling the memory well. Everything is rubbish and
> sluggish right from start-up. Something is wrong
>
well, how much total physical RAM do you have? How much swap? How much
swap is being used?
Regards,
-Robert
Jostein Elvaker Haande wrote:
On 29/04/07, somethin2cool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
even though i'm not running anything.
[snip]
This is a paste from my laptop, running with a good 2gb of RAM
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/mnt$ free -m
total used free sharedbuffers cach
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 12:00:45PM EDT, somethin2cool wrote:
> Nigel Henry wrote:
> >On Sunday 29 April 2007 16:19, somethin2cool wrote:
> >>even though i'm not running anything.
> >>
> >>in processes task manager says i'm using a total of 25mb, inc
> >>dependencies.
> >>
> >>in resources, it says
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 05:00:45PM +0100, somethin2cool wrote:
> Nigel Henry wrote:
> >On Sunday 29 April 2007 16:19, somethin2cool wrote:
> >>even though i'm not running anything.
> >>
> >>in processes task manager says i'm using a total of 25mb, inc
> >>dependencies.
> >>
> >>in resources, it sa
On 29/04/07, somethin2cool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
even though i'm not running anything.
[snip]
This is a paste from my laptop, running with a good 2gb of RAM
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/mnt$ free -m
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem: 2028 197
Andreas Janssen wrote:
somethin2cool (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
even though i'm not running anything.
in processes task manager says i'm using a total of 25mb, inc
dependencies.
in resources, it says 204. given the sluggishness of the totally
minimal system i believe the later.
however, ev
Nigel Henry wrote:
On Sunday 29 April 2007 16:19, somethin2cool wrote:
even though i'm not running anything.
in processes task manager says i'm using a total of 25mb, inc dependencies.
in resources, it says 204. given the sluggishness of the totally minimal
system i believe the later.
however
On Sunday 29 April 2007 16:19, somethin2cool wrote:
> even though i'm not running anything.
>
> in processes task manager says i'm using a total of 25mb, inc dependencies.
>
> in resources, it says 204. given the sluggishness of the totally minimal
> system i believe the later.
>
> however, even if
somethin2cool (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> even though i'm not running anything.
>
> in processes task manager says i'm using a total of 25mb, inc
> dependencies.
>
> in resources, it says 204. given the sluggishness of the totally
> minimal system i believe the later.
>
> however, even if i
even though i'm not running anything.
in processes task manager says i'm using a total of 25mb, inc dependencies.
in resources, it says 204. given the sluggishness of the totally minimal
system i believe the later.
however, even if i was to open every gui ap, it shouldn't use that much.
what
17 matches
Mail list logo
