On 12/2/24 00:02, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Sun, Dec 1, 2024 at 3:47 PM David Christensen
wrote:
On 12/1/24 04:27, Greg wrote:
Hi there,
I'm setting up MD-RAID0 on a top of HW-RAID6 devices (long story). I
would like to confirm the following:
1. The RAID0 chunk size should be the stripe widt
On Sun, Dec 1, 2024 at 3:47 PM David Christensen
wrote:
>
> On 12/1/24 04:27, Greg wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I'm setting up MD-RAID0 on a top of HW-RAID6 devices (long story). I
> > would like to confirm the following:
> >
> > 1. The RAID0 chunk size should be the stripe width of the
> > underl
If you're not fully sure of any of those parameters, I'd suggest ...
do some testing. E.g. if your target storage is quite large, maybe do only
2% of that, or possibly less - in total (approximate) size, but using the
presumed or being tested stripe/cluster/etc. sizes. And test the performance,
a
On 12/1/24 19:19, David Christensen wrote:
On 12/1/24 04:27, Greg wrote:
Hi there,
I'm setting up MD-RAID0 on a top of HW-RAID6 devices (long story). I
would like to confirm the following:
1. The RAID0 chunk size should be the stripe width of the
underlying RAID6 volumes.
2. The RAID0 metad
On 12/1/24 04:27, Greg wrote:
Hi there,
I'm setting up MD-RAID0 on a top of HW-RAID6 devices (long story). I
would like to confirm the following:
1. The RAID0 chunk size should be the stripe width of the
underlying RAID6 volumes.
2. The RAID0 metadata should be at the end of the device (meta
Hi there,
I'm setting up MD-RAID0 on a top of HW-RAID6 devices (long story). I
would like to confirm the following:
1. The RAID0 chunk size should be the stripe width of the
underlying RAID6 volumes.
2. The RAID0 metadata should be at the end of the device (metadata ver.
1.0).
3. The strid
6 matches
Mail list logo
