aphro wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> hazels >Is it at all possible this could be a kernel compiler issue? I built
> the kernel with
> hazels >the latest gcc, which is 2.95.2-3.
> hazels >
> hazels >If no answer by Friday I'll go to to the vger kernel list.
>
> ouch!!!
On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Salman Ahmed wrote:
ssahme >Are you saying that SMP kernels should not be compiled with a gcc other
ssahme >than version 2.7.2.3 ?
im just echoing the people on the list, linus, alan, and others..thats
what they say..i had big probs with kernels (SMP) that was compiled with
2
On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
hazels >Is it at all possible this could be a kernel compiler issue? I built
the kernel with
hazels >the latest gcc, which is 2.95.2-3.
hazels >
hazels >If no answer by Friday I'll go to to the vger kernel list.
ouch!!! dont ever ever ever ever ever
Is it at all possible this could be a kernel compiler issue? I built the
kernel with
the latest gcc, which is 2.95.2-3.
If no answer by Friday I'll go to to the vger kernel list.
Adam C Powell wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> About two months ago, I built 2.2.12 with SMP and RAID 5 for my
> dual-Celero
Greetings,
About two months ago, I built 2.2.12 with SMP and RAID 5 for my
dual-Celeron (Abit BP6) system with four IDE drives. I booted, and it
fsck'd the arrays just fine, and mounted all the non-RAID partitions,
but when it went to mount the RAID partitions, it froze.
I heard some reports abo
5 matches
Mail list logo