On 4/15/2013 1:44 PM, Dexter Filmore wrote:
> Am Wednesday 10 April 2013 23:54:28 schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
>> On 4/10/2013 12:32 PM, Dexter Filmore wrote:
>>> Am Wednesday 10 April 2013 18:05:08 schrieb Ross Boylan:
> You cannot get more than about 200MB/s out of a RAID1 setup, not even
> wit
On 04/15/2013 02:44 PM, Dexter Filmore wrote:
> Am Wednesday 10 April 2013 23:54:28 schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
>> On 4/10/2013 12:32 PM, Dexter Filmore wrote:
>>
>> It's not necessary to ask on linux-raid, and as you have not yet done
>> so, I'll clarify this now:
>>
>> Both the md RAID1 and RAID10 per
Am Wednesday 10 April 2013 23:54:28 schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
> On 4/10/2013 12:32 PM, Dexter Filmore wrote:
> > Am Wednesday 10 April 2013 18:05:08 schrieb Ross Boylan:
> >>> You cannot get more than about 200MB/s out of a RAID1 setup, not even
> >>> with
> >>> 15krpm SAS drives. the RAID1 will never
On 4/10/2013 12:32 PM, Dexter Filmore wrote:
> Am Wednesday 10 April 2013 18:05:08 schrieb Ross Boylan:
>>>
>>> You cannot get more than about 200MB/s out of a RAID1 setup, not even
>>> with
>>> 15krpm SAS drives. the RAID1 will never be faster than a single disk.
>>> How
>>> would it.
>>
>> It can
On 4/10/2013 9:15 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
> actually what i need is 4GB LAN throughput with teaming (802.3ad) for data
> storage to backup VMs and same huge data manipulations will be done. so
> just confused if it going to work or not.
Addressing the bonded ethernet issue:
802.3ad LACP
On 10/04/13 12:05 PM, Ross Boylan wrote:
On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 17:57 +0200, Dexter Filmore wrote:
Am Wednesday 10 April 2013 17:21:35 schrieb Muhammad Yousuf Khan:
exactly, i am using RAID 1 with mdadm and not more then 230 or 300MB
throughput. and the people are harnessing 4GB so this is the
Am Wednesday 10 April 2013 18:05:08 schrieb Ross Boylan:
> >
> > You cannot get more than about 200MB/s out of a RAID1 setup, not even
> > with
> > 15krpm SAS drives. the RAID1 will never be faster than a single disk.
> > How
> > would it.
>
> It can read faster than a single disk by combining read
On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 17:57 +0200, Dexter Filmore wrote:
> Am Wednesday 10 April 2013 17:21:35 schrieb Muhammad Yousuf Khan:
> > exactly, i am using RAID 1 with mdadm and not more then 230 or 300MB
> > throughput. and the people are harnessing 4GB so this is the point
> where i
> > am confused
>
Am Wednesday 10 April 2013 17:21:35 schrieb Muhammad Yousuf Khan:
> exactly, i am using RAID 1 with mdadm and not more then 230 or 300MB
> throughput. and the people are harnessing 4GB so this is the point where i
> am confused
You cannot get more than about 200MB/s out of a RAID1 setup, not even
exactly, i am using RAID 1 with mdadm and not more then 230 or 300MB
throughput. and the people are harnessing 4GB so this is the point where i
am confused
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
> On 10/04/13 10:15 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
>
>> i was watch a person's video re
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary Dale [mailto:garyd...@rogers.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 11 April 2013 12:39 AM
> To: debian
> Subject: Re: RAID 6 mdadm
>
> On 10/04/13 10:15 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
> > i was watch a person's video regarding RAID 6
On 10/04/13 10:15 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
i was watch a person's video regarding RAID 6 with mdadm
his configuration was very low, some old system probably
2GB RAM, 3x8TB Hard Drives, 4port Ethernet card for channeling.
and the guy was giving review of his home server. he says he will
ch
i was watch a person's video regarding RAID 6 with mdadm
his configuration was very low, some old system probably
2GB RAM, 3x8TB Hard Drives, 4port Ethernet card for channeling.
and the guy was giving review of his home server. he says he will channel
the 4 port Ethernet to achive 4Gbps network thr
13 matches
Mail list logo
