On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 01/08/08 21:15, s. keeling wrote:
> > Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> Over 90% of GNU/Linux-Users I know are suckers...
> >>
> >> Yeah GNU/Linux is free (of charge) and thats all they want.
> >
> > If you only listen to d-u and Usenet
On 01/08/08 21:15, s. keeling wrote:
Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Over 90% of GNU/Linux-Users I know are suckers...
Yeah GNU/Linux is free (of charge) and thats all they want.
If you only listen to d-u and Usenet, the power of those users' noise
can be deafening. On the other hand
Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Over 90% of GNU/Linux-Users I know are suckers...
>
> Yeah GNU/Linux is free (of charge) and thats all they want.
If you only listen to d-u and Usenet, the power of those users' noise
can be deafening. On the other hand, there are huge moves in
corpor
Am 2008-01-01 13:35:36, schrieb Paul Johnson:
> Hardware has scarcity which software lacks. There's no economic
> reason to sell software. Programmers should sell their service since
> trying to sell the product is, by definition, going to piss customers
> off and limits their freedoms.
Right, b
--- Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 January 2008, Andrew Sackville-West
> wrote:
> ...
> > > I can control my system, I can't control my
> clients' computers, so
> > > I want a minimum of possible errors on their
> computers.
> > >
> > > I would not want to make it easy f
On Jan 2, 2008, at 3:04 PM, Angus Auld wrote:
I'm not familiar with the flow of things here on
this
list, but I hope
no one is offended if I am amused by these sort of
communications.
It's all in good fun. (I hope. That's how I intended my comment,
anyway.)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
--- Angus Auld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 14:58:54 -0800 (PST)
> From: Angus Auld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Galeon R.I.P?
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> --- Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On W
On Wednesday 02 January 2008, David Brodbeck wrote:
> On Jan 2, 2008, at 6:45 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 01/02/08 08:20, s. keeling wrote:
> >> Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> Says you. I think you should spend the next year in a
On Jan 2, 2008, at 6:45 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/02/08 08:20, s. keeling wrote:
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Says you. I think you should spend the next year in a Cat in the Hat
suit, but I doubt you'll comply.
He wears furry bear suit
On Jan 1, 2008, at 9:41 PM, Hal Vaughan wrote:
I know some people respect (such as RMS) say
that, but I also think it's a statement that's more easily made by
people who get nice tidy paychecks and aren't the ones who have to
figure out how to do the marketing.
AMEN to that. It's so easy for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/02/08 08:20, s. keeling wrote:
> Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Jan 1, 2008 7:10 AM, s. keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Dec 30, 2007 7:11 AM, default <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/02/08 06:21, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
[snip]
>>
>> Yup. I just had a 2-week fling with KDE. *Really* configurable
>> (thank $DEITY, because their defaults suck), but KDE 3.5.8 is a lot
>> slower than even GNOME 2.14 and th
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Jan 1, 2008 7:10 AM, s. keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > On Dec 30, 2007 7:11 AM, default <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Same here. I've tried quite a few browsers, but none keep up with opera
> > > >
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/31/07 11:28, ZephyrQ wrote:
Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Dec 29, 2007 8:50 AM, ZephyrQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
With all the news of Netscape 'fading off' into mozilla and its ilk, is
does anyone know if Galeon is ever going
Hal Vaughan wrote:
I think eventually we'll see more open source than closed source, but
over the past 25 years or so, it seems the innovations have been made
in closed source, then emulated in open source. There are advantages
to different business models.
The first IBM mainframes back in t
Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Wednesday 02 January 2008, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
...
I can control my system, I can't control my clients' computers, so
I want a minimum of possible errors on their computers.
I would not want to make it easy for someone to grab my code and
compete. Maybe later, bu
On Wednesday 02 January 2008, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
...
> > I can control my system, I can't control my clients' computers, so
> > I want a minimum of possible errors on their computers.
> >
> > I would not want to make it easy for someone to grab my code and
> > compete. Maybe later, but I
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 10:52:16PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 January 2008, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 05:08:20PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 01 January 2008, Paul Johnson wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > > Hardware has scarcity which software
On Tuesday 01 January 2008, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 05:08:20PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> > On Tuesday 01 January 2008, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > Hardware has scarcity which software lacks. There's no economic
> > > reason to sell software. Programmers sh
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 05:08:20PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 January 2008, Paul Johnson wrote:
...
> >
> > Hardware has scarcity which software lacks. There's no economic
> > reason to sell software. Programmers should sell their service since
> > trying to sell the product is,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/01/08 15:35, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Jan 1, 2008 7:10 AM, s. keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> On Dec 30, 2007 7:11 AM, default <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 03:02:34 -0800, Angus
--- ZephyrQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Angus Auld wrote:
> > --- ZephyrQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>> big snip>>
> >>Just played with Opera for a while. I was
> >> impressed. Not afraid to
> >> pay $ for it if it can hold up to everyday usage
> >> (heck, considering how
> >> mu
On Tuesday 01 January 2008, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Jan 1, 2008 7:10 AM, s. keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > On Dec 30, 2007 7:11 AM, default <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 03:02:34 -0800, Angus Auld wrote:
> > > > > It does se
On Jan 1, 2008 7:10 AM, s. keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Dec 30, 2007 7:11 AM, default <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 03:02:34 -0800, Angus Auld wrote:
> > >
> > > > It does seem pretty fast. Personally, I use Opera, and it's be
Angus Auld wrote:
--- ZephyrQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
big snip>>
Just played with Opera for a while. I was
impressed. Not afraid to
pay $ for it if it can hold up to everyday usage
(heck, considering how
much $ I **don't** pay for software, dropping a few
bucks here and there
f
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Dec 30, 2007 7:11 AM, default <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 03:02:34 -0800, Angus Auld wrote:
> >
> > > It does seem pretty fast. Personally, I use Opera, and it's been my
> >
> > Same here. I've tried quite a few browsers, but none keep
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:31:39 -0600
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > It's a Very Big Universe, and I'm not hubristic (is that a word?)
> > enough to make such a claim.
>
> For the Jesus-followers out there, he put it this way for the
> know-it-alls, which agrees with
--- ZephyrQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>big snip>>
> Just played with Opera for a while. I was
> impressed. Not afraid to
> pay $ for it if it can hold up to everyday usage
> (heck, considering how
> much $ I **don't** pay for software, dropping a few
> bucks here and there
> for a pr
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Dec 29, 2007 8:50 AM, ZephyrQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
With all the news of Netscape 'fading off' into mozilla and its ilk, is
does anyone know if Galeon is ever going to be updated? I've tried
FireFox/etc. and there are a couple of th
Ron Johnson wrote:
It's a Very Big Universe, and I'm not hubristic (is that a word?)
enough to make such a claim.
For the Jesus-followers out there, he put it this way for the
know-it-alls, which agrees with Ron's take on matters: /"If you were
blind," Jesus told them, "you wouldn't have sin.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/31/07 11:28, ZephyrQ wrote:
> Kelly Clowers wrote:
>> On Dec 29, 2007 8:50 AM, ZephyrQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> With all the news of Netscape 'fading off' into mozilla and its ilk, is
>>> does anyone know if Galeon is ever going to be updat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/30/07 22:45, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> On Sunday 30 December 2007, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 12/30/07 21:04, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>> On Dec 30, 2007 7:11 AM, default <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 03:02:34 -0800, Angus Auld wrote:
Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Dec 29, 2007 8:50 AM, ZephyrQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
With all the news of Netscape 'fading off' into mozilla and its ilk, is
does anyone know if Galeon is ever going to be updated? I've tried
FireFox/etc. and there are a couple of things I've not be able to reproduce
On Sunday 30 December 2007, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 12/30/07 21:04, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Dec 30, 2007 7:11 AM, default <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 03:02:34 -0800, Angus Auld wrote:
> >>> It does seem pretty fast. Personally, I use Opera, and it's been
> >>> my browser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/30/07 21:04, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Dec 30, 2007 7:11 AM, default <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 03:02:34 -0800, Angus Auld wrote:
>>
>>> It does seem pretty fast. Personally, I use Opera, and it's been my
>>> browser of choi
default wrote:
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 03:02:34 -0800, Angus Auld wrote:
It does seem pretty fast. Personally, I use Opera, and it's been my
browser of choice for many moons.
Same here. I've tried quite a few browsers, but none keep up with opera
for speed. Shame it's not Open Source, but you can
On Dec 30, 2007 7:11 AM, default <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 03:02:34 -0800, Angus Auld wrote:
>
> > It does seem pretty fast. Personally, I use Opera, and it's been my
> > browser of choice for many moons.
>
> Same here. I've tried quite a few browsers, but none keep up with o
--- Allan Wind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-12-29T10:50:18-0600, ZephyrQ wrote:
> > Tabs...on the -right- hand side. After using
> Galeon for **years**, I
> > miss this and the 'tab' plug-in only lets me put
> tabs on the
> > top/bottom/left.
>
> Did you try the Tab Control add-on?
>
On Dec 29, 2007 8:50 AM, ZephyrQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With all the news of Netscape 'fading off' into mozilla and its ilk, is
> does anyone know if Galeon is ever going to be updated? I've tried
> FireFox/etc. and there are a couple of things I've not be able to reproduce:
>
> Tabs...on th
On 2007-12-29T10:50:18-0600, ZephyrQ wrote:
> Tabs...on the -right- hand side. After using Galeon for **years**, I
> miss this and the 'tab' plug-in only lets me put tabs on the
> top/bottom/left.
Did you try the Tab Control add-on?
> Quickloading of pages. I don't know if this is a Galeon th
With all the news of Netscape 'fading off' into mozilla and its ilk, is
does anyone know if Galeon is ever going to be updated? I've tried
FireFox/etc. and there are a couple of things I've not be able to reproduce:
Tabs...on the -right- hand side. After using Galeon for **years**, I
miss th
John,
Did you by any chance defragment the win95 partition? We have a
machine where doing this seems to upset the linux partition - best
guess was that the win95 defragmenter had a record of the disk
partitioning, but hadn't noticed that FIPS had shrunk the linux
partition. We couldn't quite
> Well it looks like i may just have to accept microsmurfdom. :-).
> My debian partition has gone and r--ted itself somehow.
> I shutdown last time using shutdown -r 0 back into win95 then later tried
> to access it and ouch.
>
> I recieved the following.
>
> Attempt to access beyond end of devic
On Sun, 31 Aug 1997, john wrote:
> I shutdown last time using shutdown -r 0 back into win95 then later tried
> to access it and ouch.
>
> I recieved the following.
>
> Attempt to access beyond end of device 08:03:rw=0, want=1939953655,
> limit=979965 EXT2-fs error (device08:03): ext2_find_entry:
Well it looks like i may just have to accept microsmurfdom. :-).
My debian partition has gone and r--ted itself somehow.
I shutdown last time using shutdown -r 0 back into win95 then later tried
to access it and ouch.
I recieved the following.
Attempt to access beyond end of device 08:03:rw=0, wa
45 matches
Mail list logo
