Andrei POPESCU writes:
>
> On my stable install where new packages haven't been cleared in a while
> (179 in total) I have only 2 new packages that do *not* come from
> backports (icedove-l10n-hr and icedove-l10n-hy-am).
>
> Actually I'm quite surprised about these two even showing up, given tha
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 5:21 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 05 mai 14, 04:05:28, Tom H wrote:
>> On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Andrei POPESCU
>> wrote:
>>> If one is watching for new packages it also makes sense to clear the
>>> list from time to time:
>>>
>>> aptitude --forget-new
>>
>>
On Lu, 05 mai 14, 04:05:28, Tom H wrote:
> On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Andrei POPESCU
> wrote:
> >
> > If one is watching for new packages it also makes sense to clear the
> > list from time to time:
> >
> > aptitude --forget-new
>
> Thanks for the explanation. I stored "~N" in my memory but
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 04 mai 14, 04:01:25, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> I've never used this search term but aptitude has a search for new
>> packages. I assume that a package is somehow marked as new after
>> "apt-get update" or "aptitude update".
>
> New means pack
On Lu, 05 mai 14, 00:32:55, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>
> If you are much lazier, just
> bump apt preferences to make them automatically installed. See:
>
> $ man apt_preferences
This is however not supported and not recommended.
https://lists.debian.org/20140427123500.ga2...@formorer.de
Kind regards,
Hi,
On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 11:28:22PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> I have added to my sources.list the following line:
>
> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-backports main
>
> But according to http://backports.debian.org/Instructions/, that won't
> make the backport appear in interac
On Sb, 03 mai 14, 23:28:22, Paul E Condon wrote:
> I have added to my sources.list the following line:
>
> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-backports main
>
> But according to http://backports.debian.org/Instructions/, that won't
> make the backport appear in interactive aptitude, or b
On Du, 04 mai 14, 04:01:25, Tom H wrote:
>
> I've never used this search term but aptitude has a search for new
> packages. I assume that a package is somehow marked as new after
> "apt-get update" or "aptitude update".
New means packages not previously existing in *any* repository, so in
the co
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 1:28 AM, Paul E Condon wrote:
>
> I have added to my sources.list the following line:
>
> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-backports main
>
> But according to http://backports.debian.org/Instructions/, that won't
> make the backport appear in interactive aptitude,
On Sat, 3 May 2014 23:28:22 -0600
Paul E Condon wrote:
Is there also a simple list of backported debs that I can browse
> on the web to know what is available, or a wiki pointer? I'd rather
> not subscribe to another list and monitor it regularly just for the
> very rare occation when I actually
On 4 May 2014 01:22, Tom Furie wrote:
> On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 11:28:22PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
>> I have added to my sources.list the following line:
>>
>> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-backports main
>>
>> But according to http://backports.debian.org/Instructions/, that won'
On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 11:28:22PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> I have added to my sources.list the following line:
>
> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-backports main
>
> But according to http://backports.debian.org/Instructions/, that won't
> make the backport appear in interactive
I have added to my sources.list the following line:
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-backports main
But according to http://backports.debian.org/Instructions/, that won't
make the backport appear in interactive aptitude, or be automatically
'upgraded' to the backported version. To act
13 matches
Mail list logo